DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif

65.8 KB

Extraction Summary

8
People
8
Organizations
1
Locations
6
Events
5
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Report excerpt
File Size: 65.8 KB
Summary

This document details events in November 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release, which USAO official Villafaña believed breached his non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Villafaña communicated her concerns to defense attorney Black and other officials, leading to a notice of NPA violation and the recusal of Acosta from the case. The document highlights the ongoing dispute regarding the terms of Epstein's incarceration and the perceived special treatment he received.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Villafaña USAO official / FBI case agent
Learned Epstein was on work release, notified others, sent letter to Black, spoke with Stockade's work release coordi...
Epstein Subject of investigation/conviction
On work release, applied for work release program, alleged breach of NPA, serving sentence in Palm Beach County Work ...
Acosta USAO official
Notified by Villafaña, recused from matters involving Kirkland & Ellis, discussing employment with Kirkland & Ellis.
Sloman USAO official
Notified by Villafaña, became senior USAO official for Epstein decisions, received email from Black.
Black Defense attorney
Received letter from Villafaña, responded to Villafaña's letter, forwarded email to Sloman.
Goldberger Unknown
Did not insert 'imprisoned' into plea agreement, despite agreeing to do so.
Michele Dargan Author
Co-author of 'Palm Beach sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 'treated differently'' article.
David Rogers Author
Co-author of 'Palm Beach sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 'treated differently'' article.

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
Florida Science Foundation
Office where Epstein was allowed to work during work release.
USAO (U.S. Attorney's Office)
Believed Epstein breached NPA, insisted on incarceration, gave notice of NPA violation, advised Department of Acosta'...
FBI
FBI case agent (Villafaña) involved in the case.
Stockade
Work release program facility, had a work release coordinator.
Department
Approved Acosta's recusal.
Kirkland & Ellis
Law firm heavily involved in Epstein case, Acosta discussed employment with them.
Palm Beach County Work Release Program
Program Epstein was serving his sentence in.
Palm Beach Daily News
Publisher of article about Epstein.

Timeline (6 events)

2008-11
Villafaña learned Epstein was on work release and initiated communication with other officials.
West Palm Beach
2008-11-24
Villafaña sent a letter to defense attorney Black regarding Epstein's alleged breach of NPA due to work release.
2008-11-26
USAO advised Department of Justice about Acosta's recusal from Epstein-related matters due to potential employment with Kirkland & Ellis.
2008-11-26
Defense attorney Black responded to Villafaña's letter, denying Epstein was in breach of NPA for participating in work release.
2008-12-08
Acosta's recusal formally approved by the Department.
2008-12-13
Article 'Palm Beach sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 'treated differently'' published in Palm Beach Daily News.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of Florida Science Foundation office and Palm Beach County Work Release Program.

Relationships (5)

Villafaña Investigator/Prosecutor vs. Subject Epstein
Villafaña learned Epstein was on work release, asked to indict him, asserted NPA breach.
Acosta Potential employment Kirkland & Ellis
Acosta was discussing with the firm the possibility of employment, leading to his recusal.
Sloman Senior decision-maker Epstein
Sloman became the senior USAO official responsible for making final decisions related to Epstein.
Villafaña Prosecutor vs. Defense Attorney Black
Villafaña sent Black a letter, Black responded to Villafaña's letter.
Black Communicated Sloman
Black forwarded an email to Sloman.

Key Quotes (5)

""Can I indict him now?""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
Quote #1
""more than a dozen e-mails" expressing the USAO's “insistence" that Epstein be incarcerated for 18 months, and that her June 27, 2008 letter to counsel made clear that this meant "confinement for twenty-four hours a day.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
Quote #2
"The [USAO's] Agreement not to prosecute Mr. Epstein was based upon its determination that eighteen months' incarceration (i.e., confinement twenty-four hours a day) was sufficient to satisfy the federal interest in Mr. Epstein's crimes. Accordingly, the U.S. Attorney's Office hereby gives notice that Mr. Epstein has violated the [NPA] by failing to remain incarcerated twenty-four hours a day for the eighteen-month term of imprisonment. The United States will exercise any and all rights it has under the [NPA] unless Mr. Epstein immediately ceases and desists from his breach of this agreement."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
Quote #3
"Villafaña "is very concerned about anything Epstein does""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
Quote #4
"Palm Beach sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 'treated differently'"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,134 characters)

for up to 12 hours per day, six days per week, to work at the "Florida Science Foundation" office
in West Palm Beach. 182 In mid-November 2008, Villafaña learned that Epstein was on work
release. She notified Acosta, Sloman, and the USAO Criminal Division Chief of this development
in an email, and asked, "Can I indict him now?"
On November 24, 2008, Villafaña sent defense attorney Black a letter, notifying him that
the USAO believed Epstein's application to and participation in the work release program
constituted a material breach of the NPA. Villafaña reminded Black that she had "more than a
dozen e-mails" expressing the USAO's “insistence" that Epstein be incarcerated for 18 months,
and that her June 27, 2008 letter to counsel made clear that this meant "confinement for twenty-
four hours a day." Villafaña noted that Goldberger had not inserted the word "imprisoned" into
the plea agreement, as he had agreed to do, but instead inserted the term "jail sentence." Villafaña
told counsel:
The [USAO's] Agreement not to prosecute Mr. Epstein was based
upon its determination that eighteen months' incarceration (i.e.,
confinement twenty-four hours a day) was sufficient to satisfy the
federal interest in Mr. Epstein's crimes. Accordingly, the U.S.
Attorney's Office hereby gives notice that Mr. Epstein has violated
the [NPA] by failing to remain incarcerated twenty-four hours a day
for the eighteen-month term of imprisonment. The United States
will exercise any and all rights it has under the [NPA] unless
Mr. Epstein immediately ceases and desists from his breach of this
agreement.
According to Villafaña, the FBI case agent spoke with the Stockade's work release
coordinator and reported back that that the work release coordinator told her he had been led to
believe the government knew Epstein had applied for the program, and that he had been threatened
with legal action if he did not allow Epstein to participate in work release.
On November 26, 2008, the USAO advised the Department that Acosta was recused from
all matters involving the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis, which was still heavily involved in the
Epstein case, because Acosta was discussing with the firm the possibility of employment. 183 As a
result, Sloman became the senior USAO official responsible for making final decisions related to
Epstein.
Also on November 26, 2008, Black responded to Villafaña's letter, acknowledging that
Epstein was serving his sentence in the Palm Beach County Work Release Program, but denying
that Epstein was in breach of the NPA. 184 Black noted that the NPA did not prohibit work release;
the NPA expressly provided that Epstein was to be afforded the same benefits as any other inmate;
182
Michele Dargan and David Rogers, "Palm Beach sex offender Jeffrey Epstein 'treated differently," Palm
Beach Daily News, Dec. 13, 2008.
183
The recusal was formally approved by the Department on December 8, 2008.
184
Black forwarded the email to Sloman, noting that Villafaña "is very concerned about anything Epstein does"
and that the defense team would "abide by" Sloman's decision on the issue.
115
DOJ-OGR-00023153

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document