Andrew S. Buzin
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane Doe 17
|
Client |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Laura J. Starr
|
Co counsel |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-30 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Motion to Proceed Anonymously | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Court Order issued relieving Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for Jane Doe 17. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Filing of letter motion to withdraw as counsel. | New York | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Court Order filed relieving Andrew S. Buzin as counsel for Jane Doe 17 | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-10-24 | N/A | Filing of Unopposed Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice. | US District Court SDNY | View |
042.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the United States District Court Southern District of New York, dated March 6, 2020, in Case No. 1:19-cv-09610-PAE. The order, signed by Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman, officially relieves Andrew S. Buzin and Buzin Law, P.C. as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and various associated corporations.
041.pdf
A letter motion filed on March 6, 2020, by Andrew S. Buzin of Buzin Law P.C. requesting permission to withdraw as local counsel for plaintiff Jane Doe 17 in her case against Indyke and Kahn (executors of the Epstein estate). The client requested the discharge, and she remains represented by attorneys from Weisman, Brodie, Starr & Margolies, P.A. and Alan Goldfarb, P.A. The letter notes that the case is currently stayed pending the plaintiff's potential participation in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
041-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated March 6, 2020, in the case of Jane Doe 17 v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. Judge Debra C. Freeman orders that attorney Andrew S. Buzin and his firm are relieved and discharged from representing the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document lists numerous corporate defendants associated with Epstein's estate.
036-01.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed by a plaintiff identified as Jane Doe 17 against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various corporate entities associated with him. The plaintiff alleges that she was a victim of a sex trafficking enterprise led by Epstein and facilitated by the defendant corporations, seeking damages under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (18 U.S.C. ยง 1595) and for common law battery. The document details the alleged scheme, the role of the corporate defendants in enabling the abuse, and includes an asset summary of Epstein's estate as an exhibit.
024.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-09610-PAE). The plaintiff, identified as Jane Doe 17, is suing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and various associated corporate entities (including Nine East 71st Street Corp and Financial Trust Company). The motion requests a court order allowing the plaintiff to proceed anonymously and lists the legal representation for the plaintiff from three different law firms.
024-01.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on November 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, requesting that Plaintiff 'Jane Doe 17' be allowed to proceed anonymously in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The motion argues that the sensitive nature of the sexual assault allegations, the risk of retaliation due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the lack of public interest in her specific identity outweigh the presumption of open proceedings. Attached as Exhibit A is a September 11, 2019 Order from Judge P. Kevin Castel in a similar case (Katlyn Doe v. Indyke), which granted anonymity under nearly identical circumstances.
010.pdf
This document is an unopposed motion filed on October 24, 2019, in the Southern District of New York by attorney Andrew S. Buzin. The motion seeks the admission of Florida attorney Laura J. Starr *pro hac vice* to represent the Plaintiff, Jane Doe 17, in her lawsuit against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein and associated entities. The filing includes Starr's declaration, a certificate of good standing from the Florida Supreme Court, and a proposed order. Defense counsel Bennet Moskowitz stated that the Defendants do not oppose the motion.
009.pdf
This is an unopposed motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York by Andrew S. Buzin to admit Laura J. Starr pro hac vice as counsel for the plaintiff, Jane Doe 17. The document includes a declaration by Laura J. Starr confirming her good standing with the Florida Bar and lack of disciplinary history, a certificate of service, and a certificate of good standing from the Florida Bar.
Jane Doe 17 v. Indyke and Kahn, et al. (Withdrawal of Cou...
Request to withdraw as local counsel for Jane Doe 17 per client instruction.
Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice
Buzin consulted with Moskowitz, who advised that Defendants do not oppose the motion.
Service of Motion
Service of Motion, Affidavit, and Order via email.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity