| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
This document is an email dated April 5, 2021, from an unspecified DOJ/USANYS official to colleagues (including a contractor and USANYS staff). The sender requests that a paralegal retrieve a CD delivered by the FBI on the previous Friday, which sits on their desk on the 4th floor. The CD contains additional files needed for the review of the Ghislaine Maxwell case, and the sender provides a specific DOJ network path ('Epstein share') where the files should be uploaded, referencing 'USvEpstein-2018R01618'.
This document is an email from May 2021 containing an internal DOJ 'Urgent Matter Report' (UMR). The report details the decision by the USAO-SDNY to offer deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs) to Tova Noel and Michael Thomas, the correctional officers on duty when Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in August 2019. The agreement requires them to admit guilt regarding falsified records, perform community service, and cooperate with the OIG investigation into the institutional failures at the MCC.
This document is a DOJ email chain from June 25, 2021, regarding the administration of digital evidence files for the 'USvEpstein' case (Case ID 2018R01618). Staff members discuss creating specific network folders for a redacted testifying witness and saving attached notes. The file paths reveal the directory structure used by the prosecution for trial preparation and witness management.
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel sent on October 23, 2019, confirming final approval for a travel authorization. A redacted individual (likely a DOJ employee) is authorized to travel to West Palm Beach, Florida, on November 4, 2019, for the purpose of 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews'.
This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) dated September 2020 regarding the discovery process in the US v. Epstein/Maxwell case. Staff discuss the technical logistics of uploading approximately 40,000 files (300GB), including 'Images Seized During Search' and financial records from Deutsche Bank and JPMorgan, into a Relativity database hosted by PAE. The emails cover procedural details such as confidential stamping, Bates numbering, and privilege review requirements.
This document is an internal DOJ email dated February 25, 2021, from an automated report server. It distributes the 'Child Exploitation & Porn Update Report III' for Project Safe Childhood and instructs Chiefs and Coordinators to remind Assistant United States Attorneys (AUSAs) to update their case files. The recipients of the email are redacted.
This document is an internal email dated November 4, 2020, containing 'SDNY Press Clippings.' It lists various news articles of interest to the Southern District of New York, specifically highlighting a NY Post article about Epstein victims dropping cases against Ghislaine Maxwell and the Epstein estate, as well as an update on the Joshua Schulte trial. The email also includes links to broader news topics such as the 2020 election, financial crimes, and international affairs.
This document is an email dated October 26, 2020, containing 'SDNY Press Clippings.' It lists various news articles relevant to the Southern District of New York, with a specific section dedicated to Ghislaine Maxwell covering her jail status and evidence disputes. The 'Matters of Interest' section covers broader political and legal news involving Donald Trump, Hunter Biden, Christopher Wray, and others.
This document is an email chain involving Assistant U.S. Attorneys from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) requesting administrative approval for travel related to the investigation 'United States v. Epstein' (Case 2018R01618). The emails span from March to July 2019 and detail multiple trips to Florida (Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, Fort Lauderdale) and one trip to Los Angeles for the purpose of conducting victim interviews and meetings. The correspondence highlights the active preparation of the prosecution team leading up to Epstein's arrest in July 2019.
This document contains a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Martin Weinberg and Marc Fernich) and SDNY prosecutors in July 2019, shortly after Epstein's arrest. The correspondence primarily concerns the return of personal effects (cash, clothes) and the retention of electronic devices (phones, computers) seized during the arrest, with the government confirming they obtained a warrant to search the electronics. Significant discussion focuses on the protocol for reviewing these devices ('taint team') to protect attorney-client privilege and clarification regarding the recusal of the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) and the involvement of the Northern District of Georgia.
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel voucher for a DOJ employee. The voucher, totaling $2,152.79, is for a trip taken from September 17-20, 2019. The stated purpose of the travel is 'R19NYS13842 - U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews,' indicating government travel related to the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein following his death.
This document is a legal declaration by Maureen P. Baird, a former BOP Warden, submitted to the Westminster Magistrates' Court for the extradition case of Julian Assange. Baird provides expert testimony on the harsh conditions of Special Administrative Measures (SAMs), the ADX Florence supermax prison, and Communication Management Units (CMUs). Significantly, she references the suicide of Jeffrey Epstein at MCC New York (where she was formerly Warden) multiple times to illustrate the failure of BOP suicide prevention protocols, noting specifically that cameras malfunction and self-reporting is unreliable.
This document is an email thread from November 20, 2019, discussing a travel voucher correction for a DOJ trip. The trip, which took place from November 13-15, 2019, in Santa Monica, CA, was for the purpose of a 'Witness Interview' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID R20NYS13179). The correspondence involves disputes over lodging costs and tax exemptions at the Doubletree by Hilton.
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel authorization (Trip ID 10982117) for a DOJ employee. The trip, scheduled for February 3-8, 2020, is for 'Witness Interviews' in Stockholm, Sweden, specifically related to the 'Epstein investigation' (Case ID 2018R01618). The traveler's name and the approver's name are redacted.
This document is a legal filing by Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and 2 in May 2019, arguing for specific procedures to determine a remedy after the court ruled the Government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by secretly negotiating a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. The petitioners argue the Government should immediately announce its proposed remedy, specifically the rescission of the NPA's immunity clauses, and request limited discovery including depositions of key figures like former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz regarding a secret 2007 'breakfast meeting.' The filing includes correspondence between victims' counsel and the U.S. Attorney's Office, highlighting the Government's delay tactics and the recent recusal of the Southern District of Florida office.
This document is an internal USANYS email chain dated April 26, 2021, regarding oral arguments before the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The email highlights a bail appeal hearing for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell scheduled for that morning before Judges Leval, Lohier, and Sullivan. The forwarding sender instructs the recipient to calendar only the 'Thursday argument,' details of which appear to be redacted in the black block at the bottom of the page.
This document is a heavily redacted email printout dated December 2, 2020. The subject line 'Re: USVI AG' suggests correspondence regarding the US Virgin Islands Attorney General. The Message-ID reveals the email originated from the Department of Justice (usa.doj.gov).
This document is an email header dated October 10, 2020, originating from the Department of Justice (indicated by the @usa.doj.gov Message-ID). The subject is 'Re: search terms for devices', suggesting administrative or investigative correspondence regarding digital forensics or evidence processing. The sender and primary recipients are redacted.
This document is an email thread between SDNY/DOJ officials dated June 1, 2020, discussing the logistics of providing physical copies of bank subpoena returns to a case agent. The specific records mentioned are from FirstBank Puerto Rico. The email includes a network file path referencing 'USvEpstein-2018R01618', indicating the specific internal case ID for the 2018 SDNY investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a heavily redacted email header dated November 23, 2020. It appears to be a government record, indicated by the Message-ID domain '@usa.doj.gov' (Department of Justice) and the Bates number EFTA00026463. The email was blind copied (Bcc) to 'USAHUB-USAJournal111', suggesting an archival or monitoring process.
This document is an automated email notification dated May 4, 2020, from the E2 Solutions travel system (used by the DOJ) regarding a final travel voucher for review. The voucher relates to a trip taken from December 15-18, 2019, to Santa Monica, CA, for the specific purpose of 'Epstein Investigation - Witness interview' (Case ID R20NYS13444). The traveler's name is redacted.
This document is an email thread from May 2020 regarding a late travel voucher for a DOJ employee. The voucher relates to a trip taken from December 15-18, 2019, to Santa Monica. The explicitly stated purpose of the trip was 'R20NYS13444 - Epstein Investigation - Witness interview,' indicating active federal investigation efforts into the Epstein case in late 2019.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 13-14, 2020. Nicholas Biase distributed a daily press clipping digest to 'Chiefs' and later forwarded it to a redacted recipient, specifically noting the inclusion of articles related to Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists numerous hyperlinks to major news outlets covering the Maxwell/Epstein case, as well as other political and legal 'Matters of Interest'.
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's travel system (E2Solutions) dated November 7, 2019. It confirms the partial approval of a travel authorization (Trip ID 10808018) for an unnamed traveler to go to Santa Monica, CA from November 13-15, 2019. The explicit purpose of the trip is 'Witness Interviews' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein (2018R01618)', indicating ongoing investigation activities months after Epstein's death.
This document is an email chain between the law firm Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) spanning January to April 2020. The law firm submitted a 'Touhy letter' requesting documents from the DOJ regarding pending litigation against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The USANYS eventually produced a set of documents and a response letter on April 21, 2020, followed by the scheduling of a phone call to discuss the production.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity