Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 211, which would alter the victim certification pro... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 213, which would remove law enforcement from the in... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 211, specifically changing 'and' to 'or' in the cer... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 213, which would remove law enforcement from the in... | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-11 | Legal communication | The French Ministry of Justice sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice explaining its nat... | Paris, France | View |
EFTA00014417.pdf
This document is an automated email notification regarding a travel voucher approval for a trip taken by a DOJ employee (name redacted) from February 19-20, 2020. The purpose of the trip was a 'Witness interview' in Pensacola, FL, specifically for case 'R20NYS13401 - Epstein Investigation'.
EFTA00014263.pdf
This document is a compilation of SDNY news clips from March 9, 2020. Key topics include U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman's statement that Prince Andrew has refused to cooperate with the Epstein investigation, the massive indictment of 27 individuals (including trainers Jorge Navarro and Jason Servis) in a horse racing doping scandal, and the mistrial in the Joshua Schulte CIA leak case. It also covers the transfer of MCC staff following Epstein's suicide, the sex trafficking case of Lawrence Ray, and tensions between SDNY Attorney Berman and Attorney General William Barr regarding DOJ independence.
EFTA00014243.pdf
This document is a compilation of 'SDNY News Clips' from March 9, 2020, summarizing major legal news relevant to the Southern District of New York. Key stories include Prince Andrew's refusal to cooperate in the Epstein investigation, the transfer of the MCC jail captain following Epstein's suicide, a massive horse racing doping indictment involving high-profile trainers, the hung jury in the Joshua Schulte CIA leak trial, and internal DOJ conflicts between U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman and Attorney General William Barr. It also touches on Harvey Weinstein's injury in jail and new court restrictions due to the emerging Coronavirus outbreak. No flight logs were present in the document.
EFTA00013801.pdf
This document is a legal rebuttal from Kirkland & Ellis LLP regarding the government's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation and the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues that the DOJ's review was not independent, alleges prosecutorial misconduct regarding victim notification and the selection of victim representatives (citing a conflict of interest involving an AUSA's boyfriend), and disputes the government's characterization of the sexual conduct. The document also details the defense's objections to the government's threat to terminate the agreement if Epstein did not comply with unilaterally modified terms by June 2, 2008.
EFTA00013715.pdf
This document is an email dated December 10, 2007, sent by an unnamed Assistant U.S. Attorney to Alex Acosta (USAFLS). The email calls attention to a New York Magazine article about Jeffrey Epstein and provides the URL. The sender's identity and contact details are redacted, though their office address in West Palm Beach is visible.
EFTA00013676.pdf
This document is an automated email read receipt sent by Alex Acosta (USAFLS) on July 11, 2008. The receipt confirms he read an email with the subject 'Just got back from Epstein hearing'. The recipient of the read receipt (the original sender of the email) is redacted. The message is marked with High Importance and Urgent Priority.
EFTA00013552.pdf
A 2008 email from a federal prosecutor arguing against delaying the Epstein case. The author cites expiring statutes of limitations for 5 of 16 indicted victims, the risk of losing the ability to prosecute for 'additional girls,' and the fact that the Grand Jury is ready to indict. The email reveals there are over 20 known child victims and mentions a 'state resolution' deal Epstein signed months prior.
EFTA00013518.pdf
This document is an email dated October 24, 2007, regarding the Epstein case. The sender (redacted) writes to Jay Lefkowitz, copying Alex Acosta (USAFLS), to provide a revised letter and addendum for Judge Davis. The email details minor formatting changes to the addendum and requests Lefkowitz execute and return the documents via PDF and Fed Ex.
EFTA00013389.pdf
This document is an internal 'Case-Related Urgent' report dated May 20, 2021, detailing the USAO-SDNY's decision to offer deferred prosecution agreements to correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. The officers were previously indicted for falsifying records on the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in August 2019. The agreement requires them to admit guilt, perform community service, and cooperate with the Office of Inspector General's investigation into the institutional failures at the MCC.
EFTA00013359.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised "poor judgment" in resolving the case via the NPA and failing to ensure victims were properly notified, he and his staff did not commit professional misconduct as defined by DOJ standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the secret negotiations, the subsequent violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and the eventual fallout leading to Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019.
EFTA00013250.pdf
This document is an email header dated October 12, 2020, originating from a Department of Justice address. The subject line 'Re: Epstein SW returns' likely refers to Search Warrant returns related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The recipients appear to be affiliated with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00011475.pdf
This document is an Executive Summary of a November 2020 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility report investigating the 2006-2008 federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. It details the negotiation of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) approved by then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta, which allowed Epstein to plead to lesser state charges, and examines the failure of the government to consult with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The report concludes that while Acosta and other attorneys did not commit professional misconduct by definition, Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via the NPA and the government failed to treat victims with necessary forthrightness.
EFTA00011037.pdf
This document is an internal email dated January 14, 2021, containing 'SDNY Press Clippings' circulated within the Department of Justice. It aggregates news headlines relevant to the Southern District of New York, including a Toyota settlement, the Capitol riots arrests, Trump's impeachment, and a variety article about a scripted adaptation of the 'Hunting Ghislaine' podcast. The email highlights media coverage of ongoing legal and political events of interest to the SDNY office.
EFTA00011036.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Department of Justice's travel system (E2Solutions) dated July 19, 2019. It alerts a redacted DOJ employee that their travel voucher for a trip to West Palm Beach is late. The trip, which occurred on July 11-12, 2019 (shortly after Epstein's arrest), was specifically for 'Victim Interviews' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein'.
EFTA00010817.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel to a redacted Department of Justice employee regarding a late travel voucher. The voucher relates to a trip taken to Santa Monica from September 17-20, 2019, specifically for the purpose of 'Witness Interviews' in the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID R19NYS13842). This indicates ongoing federal investigation activities post-dating Epstein's death in August 2019.
EFTA00010816.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 1, 2019, regarding a travel voucher for a trip taken by a DOJ employee/affiliate. The automated email details a trip to Santa Monica from September 17-20, 2019, specifically for the purpose of 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews' (Case ID R19NYS13842).
EFTA00010786.pdf
This document is a series of forwarded emails from whistleblower Christopher Dilorio to redacted recipients (likely SEC/FBI officials) between April 2019 and April 2020. Dilorio alleges a complex web of financial fraud, money laundering, and regulatory capture involving Apollo Global Management (Leon Black), Jeffrey Epstein, Jared Kushner, and various public companies like Athene and DryShips. The emails claim that the SEC is complicit in covering up these crimes and that Epstein was running a Ponzi/slush fund facilitated by these financial connections.
EFTA00010542.pdf
This document is the United States Government's legal response to proposed remedies by victims (Petitioners) of Jeffrey Epstein following a court finding that the government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) by failing to confer with them before entering a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The government admits its communication with victims was insufficient but argues against the Petitioners' request to partially rescind the NPA, citing contract law, potential harm to other victims relying on the agreement, and separation of powers. Instead, the government proposes holding a public hearing for victim impact statements, arranging meetings between victims and DOJ representatives, and mandating additional training for prosecutors.
EFTA00010357.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from December 13, 2019, regarding a travel authorization (Trip ID 10892303) for a DOJ employee. The trip, scheduled for December 15-17, 2019, to Santa Monica, California, was for the purpose of a 'Witness Interview' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein'. The names of the traveler and approvers are redacted.
EFTA00010355.pdf
This document is an automated email notification dated November 26, 2019, from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel authorization (ID 10810414-1). The authorization concerns a trip to Santa Monica, CA, from November 13-15, 2019, for the purpose of a 'Witness Interview' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID R20NYS13179). The email indicates the travel was approved by a redacted individual and was awaiting further approval, seemingly processed after the travel dates occurred.
EFTA00010274.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel voucher for a trip taken by a DOJ official (name redacted) in December 2019. The trip's purpose is explicitly listed as 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews' in Santa Monica, California. The document details the costs associated with the trip ($1,296.43 expenses) and provides links to the DOJ's internal travel system.
EFTA00010273.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWTSatoTravel confirming the final approval of a travel voucher for a trip taken by an unnamed individual from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The trip occurred from September 17-20, 2019, to Santa Monica, CA, for the specific purpose of conducting witness interviews for the 'U.S. v. Epstein' case. The total expenses approved for the voucher were $2,152.79.
EFTA00010272.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding a travel voucher for a Department of Justice employee. The voucher (ID 10643456-2) covers a trip to Santa Monica, California, from September 17-20, 2019, for the specific purpose of conducting 'Witness Interviews' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID R19NYS13842). The email confirms partial approval of expenses totaling $2,152.79.
EFTA00010203.pdf
This document contains a Department of Justice 'MEGA4 Automated Litigation Support System Account Request and Approval Form' specifically for the case 'US v. Epstein' (DJ Number 2442-0129). Attached to the request form is a 7-page policy document titled 'Rules of Behavior (ROB) for General Users Version 7.0', dated January 3, 2014, which outlines IT security protocols for DOJ employees. The specific individuals requesting or approving access are redacted.
EFTA00010174.pdf
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request form submitted on November 11, 2021, by an Assistant US Attorney to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit. It requests travel arrangements for a redacted witness to attend trial preparation and the trial itself in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The form includes administrative details and standard instructions for domestic witness travel expenses.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity