| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the witness
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
witness
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
the witness
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Goldberger
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Goldberger
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Goldberger
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Deponent
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed female witness
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Pincus
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Professional opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed witness
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-07-26 | N/A | Mr. Leopold filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein in federal court. | Federal Court | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Deposition/testimony | Questioning of a witness by Mr. Tein regarding what she told Epstein about her age, with objectio... | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Deposition | An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about lying about their age on MySpace pages, referenc... | N/A | View |
| 2017-07-26 | Deposition | A legal deposition where a contentious argument occurred between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regardi... | West Palm Beach (implied) | View |
| 2017-07-24 | Deposition | Mr. Leopold's deposition was taken for four hours on Monday in preparation for the hearing. | N/A | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Deposition Testimony | Unknown | View |
| 2008-02-20 | N/A | Deposition of Jane Doe. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness, accompanied by their lawyer, Mr. Leopold, is questioned about a criminal prosecution and a related civil lawsuit. The questioner reveals that Mr. Leopold has recently filed a $50 million lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 131) produced by Consor & Associates. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding scheduling and professional courtesy, specifically concerning someone named Jack canceling vacation plans. The argument escalates until Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold selfish and abruptly terminates the deposition, with Mr. Goldberger instructing to go off the record.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, capturing a tense exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger. Mr. Goldberger is upset about a hearing that was canceled at the last minute, forcing him to disrupt a vacation, and questions the reason. Mr. Leopold denies knowing why it was canceled, speculates it relates to his own recent deposition, and offers to provide an affidavit from a Mr. Pincus to confirm his lack of knowledge.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. The speakers, Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold, and Ms. Belohlavek from the State Attorneys Office, discuss procedural matters related to evidence, specifically barcoded documents and color copies. One speaker also expresses an intent to obtain affidavits from Mr. Pincus and Judge Stern to better understand the events of the hearing.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated argument between several individuals, primarily Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of being a liar and an obstructionist, specifically claiming that Mr. Leopold lied in a letter to his co-counsel about being unavailable for a hearing.
This document appears to be a transcript of a legal deposition. The discussion centers around exhibits, their marking, and preventing their removal from the room. Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein are involved in a disagreement regarding the exhibits.
This document is page 124 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated and adversarial exchange between several individuals, identified as Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Tein, regarding the proper procedure for copying and marking photo exhibits. The conversation is marked by frequent interruptions, personal insults, and appeals to a third party, highlighting significant conflict between the participants.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about the credibility of their parents, specifically establishing that the witness's father served two years in federal prison for financial fraud and stealing from a financial institution. Opposing counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, leading to an accusation of witness coaching from Mr. Tein.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript marked 'Page 117' and 'Page 2792'. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding procedural rules and objections. Mr. Tein aggressively questions a witness, asserting that the witness's parents, who filed a police report, are 'liars,' prompting Mr. Leopold to instruct the witness not to answer and to state for the record that the question was inappropriate and misleading.
This document is page 110 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about serious allegations, including whether a firefighter named Brett is in a relationship with a minor and whether the witness has lied about their sister's alleged drug habit. The witness denies the accusations while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to the questions as argumentative.
Preparation for the deposition testimony.
Leopold asks witness to spell a word; Witness begins spelling 'N-i-g-g'; Tein interrupts.
Argument regarding repetitive questioning, yelling, and a mistaken identity of Mr. Tein's first name.
Mr. Tein alleges that Mr. Leopold lied in a letter to his co-counsel, stating he was unavailable for a morning hearing when he was not.
Question asked if FBI agents told witness these two had spoken. Witness answered 'No'.
Verbal argument regarding taking a recess and preserving audio recordings of the deposition.
Verbal argument regarding the validity of objections and scheduling conflicts during a deposition.
Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.
Agreement to schedule Jane Doe No. 1's deposition for Feb 20, 2008 and accept service.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity