Pomerantz
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Flatley
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Drescher
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Menninger
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Recross-examination of witness Mr. Flatley concludes, and the court announces a mid-morning break. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding Government Exhibit 422, a do... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Direct examination of witness Ms. Swain in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court | View |
DOJ-OGR-00017943.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between attorneys (Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Pagliuca) and the judge regarding a question posed to a witness, Dr. Rocchio. The judge clarifies why a specific question about grooming and sexual gratification was objected to and ultimately precluded, citing the narrow basis for excluding testimony on the theory of 'grooming by proxy'.
DOJ-OGR-00015016.jpg
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. Attorney Pagliuca successfully moves to admit Defendant's Exhibit A into evidence with no objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Pomerantz. Mr. Pagliuca then begins to question the witness, addressed as 'Doctor', about another piece of evidence, Exhibit B.
DOJ-OGR-00014933.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. During a direct examination, a witness named Dr. Rocchio is questioned about 'Government Exhibit 5', which he identifies as an article about the evolution of the term 'grooming' and its use by child perpetrators. Another individual, Ms. Pomerantz, is also present and speaks during the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00014883.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on January 15, 2025. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of a government witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The transcript includes the witness being sworn in and receiving procedural instructions from the judge regarding microphone usage before the questioning commences.
DOJ-OGR-00014882.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated January 15, 2025. Counsel discusses logistical matters, including receiving permission for Mr. Pagliuca to miss a final pretrial conference due to a hearing in Colorado. The court then moves to a Daubert hearing concerning the government's proposed expert, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, whose name pronunciation is clarified for the record.
DOJ-OGR-00018681.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The court excuses a witness, Mr. Flatley, after his recross-examination. After a brief exchange with government counsel, Ms. Pomerantz, the court announces a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018680.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures the end of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley, who confirms that an internet-connected computer could automatically populate emails. After attorney Ms. Pomerantz concludes her questions, the judge excuses Mr. Flatley and announces a 15-minute mid-morning break for the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00018667.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. At the direction of an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, Mr. Flatley reads aloud three paragraphs from a document he wrote, which describes the close, long-term relationship between individuals named Jeffrey and Ghislaine. The text characterizes them as a couple who are rarely apart and portrays Ghislaine as intelligent and personable.
DOJ-OGR-00018661.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by attorney Ms. Pomerantz regarding Government Exhibits 420B, 421B, and 422B. After the witness affirms their accuracy, the exhibits are admitted into evidence by the court without objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00016645.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Dr. Loftus. An attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, questions Dr. Loftus about a specific passage from her book, "Witness for the Defense," concerning the dual role of a psychologist as both an advocate and an impartial educator in court. The book and the specific passage on page 238 are identified as Government Exhibit 1518.
DOJ-OGR-00016569.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding on August 10, 2022. It captures the moment the court calls for a recess, dismissing the witness, Ms. Espinosa, and the jury. After a brief exchange with the government counsel (Ms. Pomerantz) and defense counsel (Mr. Everdell), the court resumes the session, instructing Mr. Everdell to continue his direct examination of Ms. Espinosa.
DOJ-OGR-00013079.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The questioning focuses on the metadata and titles of government exhibits, specifically establishing creation and modification dates in September 2002. The witness identifies the titles of two documents as "PB New Shampoo and Massage Products" (Exhibit 420) and "Palm Beach House Workers" (Exhibit 418R).
DOJ-OGR-00013029.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a conversation between the judge, government counsel (Mr. Rohrbach), and opposing counsel (Ms. Menninger) regarding the scope of testimony for a witness named Mr. Flatley. The government agrees not to question Mr. Flatley about 'CDs' on direct examination, resolving the issue and making prior preparation on the topic moot for the time being.
DOJ-OGR-00013813.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Swain, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony covers Ms. Swain's relationship with a young woman named Annie, including discussions about college, and also touches on an individual named Maria who lived in New York in 1995. The witness confirms having spoken with Jeffrey Epstein on the phone, and the transcript records a sustained hearsay objection by another attorney, Ms. Menninger.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply in Support of Her Motion for a ...
This document certifies that on February 9, 2022, a legal motion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's request for a new trial was electronically filed with the Court and served to the listed government counsel via their email addresses.
Ghislaine Maxwell’s Reply in Support of Her Motion for a ...
This document certifies that on February 9, 2022, a legal motion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's request for a new trial was electronically filed with the Court and served to the listed government counsel via their email addresses.
Service of Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion in Limine
Notification of filing regarding Motion to Exclude Government Exhibit 52
Notification of filing: Ghislaine Maxwell’s Motion to Exc...
Service of motion papers via the court's electronic system.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity