DOJ-OGR-00013029.jpg

523 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 523 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a conversation between the judge, government counsel (Mr. Rohrbach), and opposing counsel (Ms. Menninger) regarding the scope of testimony for a witness named Mr. Flatley. The government agrees not to question Mr. Flatley about 'CDs' on direct examination, resolving the issue and making prior preparation on the topic moot for the time being.

People (5)

Name Role Context
ROHRBACH Counsel
Speaker in the transcript, referred to as MR. ROHRBACH. Appears to be representing the government.
Pomerantz Counsel
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as someone he would confer with, suggesting she is a colleague on the legal team.
Flatley Witness
The subject of the discussion, a person who is to be questioned in court. The scope of his testimony regarding 'CDs' ...
Menninger Counsel
Speaker in the transcript, referred to as MS. MENNINGER. Appears to be opposing counsel to Mr. Rohrbach.
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings and addressed as 'your Honor'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
government government agency
Mentioned as the party represented by Mr. Rohrbach, responsible for the direct examination of Mr. Flatley.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A legal discussion during a court proceeding to determine the scope of questioning for a witness named Flatley.
Courtroom (implied)
THE COURT MR. ROHRBACH MS. MENNINGER Ms. Pomerantz

Relationships (4)

MR. ROHRBACH professional Ms. Pomerantz
Mr. Rohrbach states, 'If I could confer with Ms. Pomerantz,' indicating they are colleagues on the same legal team.
MR. ROHRBACH professional MS. MENNINGER
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, discussing a legal issue before the judge.
MR. ROHRBACH professional THE COURT
Mr. Rohrbach is a lawyer addressing the judge ('your Honor') in a formal court setting.
MS. MENNINGER professional THE COURT
Ms. Menninger is a lawyer addressing the judge ('your Honor') in a formal court setting.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, the government is not planning to talk with Mr. Flatley on direct about CDs."
Source
— MR. ROHRBACH (Stating the government's position to the court to resolve a point of contention about witness testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00013029.jpg
Quote #1
"So if you're not going to ask about CDs on direct, if he's not crossed on CDs, that's the end of the matter."
Source
— THE COURT (Summarizing the agreement and concluding the discussion on the specific issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00013029.jpg
Quote #2
"Well, it sounds like all that work we did on Flatley last night will just go in the can for future use."
Source
— THE COURT (A concluding remark suggesting that preparation was done for a line of questioning that will now not be needed.)
DOJ-OGR-00013029.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,449 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 264
LC7VMAX1
1438
1 government being too cute here and saying we're not going to do
2 it on direct, but you know full well you're going to do it on
3 redirect.
4 MR. ROHRBACH: Understood, your Honor.
5 If I could confer with Ms. Pomerantz, she's putting it
6 on; but I suspect it really is unlikely to come out on redirect
7 at all.
8 THE COURT: Okay.
9 (Counsel conferred)
10 MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, the government is not
11 planning to talk with Mr. Flatley on direct about CDs. So it's
12 hard to imagine what exactly would happen on cross that would
13 make this an issue; but, of course, the government doesn't want
14 to limit itself by promising under no circumstances will it
15 elicit this information.
16 THE COURT: Okay.
17 So if you're not going to ask about CDs on direct, if
18 he's not crossed on CDs, that's the end of the matter.
19 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Ms. Menninger, does that get us where we
21 need?
22 MS. MENNINGER: That's fine, your Honor. Thank you.
23 THE COURT: Okay. Great. Thank you both.
24 All right. Well, it sounds like all that work we did
25 on Flatley last night will just go in the can for future use.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013029

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document