Germany
LocationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
U.S. spying on Merkel
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Britain
|
Historical competitors |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-30 | N/A | Industrial age power games/competitive sprint between Britain and Germany. | Europe | View |
| 1890-01-01 | N/A | Germany looks at Britain’s imperial navy. | Europe | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019687.jpg
This document is a page (p. 199) from a book, likely titled 'Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales' (based on the filename ISBN), which was included in a House Oversight Committee document production (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019687). The text provides a historical overview of the rise of the National Security Agency (NSA), detailing its origins in WWII cryptography (breaking Enigma and Purple ciphers), its formal establishment by President Truman in 1952, and its dual mission of protecting US communications while intercepting foreign intelligence during the Cold War. The footer indicates the file was processed or printed on September 30, 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019673.jpg
This document discusses the aftermath of the Snowden leaks, focusing on documents released after Snowden left Hong Kong, particularly regarding the alleged surveillance of German Chancellor Angela Merkel. It details the intelligence community's suspicion that hostile parties like Russia or China may have gained access to sensitive NSA "Level 3" documents, potentially compromising U.S. espionage capabilities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019672.jpg
This document is page 184 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses the timeline of Edward Snowden's leaks, specifically questioning how documents released in 2016 (via The Intercept) regarding Israeli drone intercepts were distributed if Snowden supposedly destroyed his files. The author cites a former KGB officer who suggests that Snowden's continued release of documents while in Russia was likely orchestrated or approved by Russian intelligence services.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019670.jpg
This document is page 182 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the footer 'Epst' and ISBN), stamped as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the timeline of the 'Merkel document' (NSA spying on Angela Merkel), arguing that this specific document was not in the cache Snowden gave to journalists in Hong Kong but was likely provided to *Der Spiegel* after Snowden arrived in Moscow. It cites expert James Bamford, who searched the Hong Kong archive and found no mention of Merkel, suggesting Snowden or another party released it from Russia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019665.jpg
This document is page 177 from a book (likely 'Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales' based on the ISBN in the footer file name) included in House Oversight Committee evidence. The text details the legal complexities facing Edward Snowden, specifically the challenges his lawyer Ben Wizner (ACLU) faced in securing amnesty or a plea deal with the DOJ. It discusses the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989, the strategic damage caused by Snowden fleeing to Russia, and Wizner's role as a gatekeeper for media access to Snowden.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019623.jpg
This document appears to be page 135 from a book proof (likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein, given the ISBN and filename) included in a House Oversight Committee production. The text details the timeline of the NSA discovering Edward Snowden's theft of documents in 2013, the involvement of General Alexander and Booz Allen Hamilton, and the initiation of the damage assessment investigation led by Rick Ledgett. It tracks Snowden's movements from Hawaii to Hong Kong and the internal communications regarding his unauthorized absence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019597.jpg
This document is page 109 from a book, likely 'How America Lost Its Secrets' by Edward Jay Epstein (indicated by the ISBN in the footer), which is part of a House Oversight Committee file. The text details Edward Snowden's time in Russia, his asylum, the risks taken by his associates like Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange, and his subsequent media appearances and financial earnings ($20,000 from TED). It critiques Snowden's transition from a technician to a media figure and his rhetoric regarding facing prison versus escaping to Russia.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019512.jpg
This document is page 24 from the book 'How America Lost Its Secrets' (likely by Edward Jay Epstein, based on the filename), included in a House Oversight file dump. It details Edward Snowden's lifestyle and financial activities in 2008, including his use of aliases 'Wolfking Awesomefox' and 'TrueHooHa', significant gambling losses on the stock market, and his angry online outbursts against Ben Bernanke and others on Ars Technica. It connects his personal financial distress to his time working for the CIA on sensitive operations in Switzerland.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019453.jpg
This document is page 6 of a report produced by CEFOTAJ, a non-profit organization. It details the geopolitical and economic relationship between the U.S. and Haiti, outlining significant financial aid contributions from the U.S. and World Bank donors between 1995 and 2008. The text analyzes Haiti's economic struggles prior to the 2010 earthquake, citing political instability and corruption, while also noting the country's openness to foreign banking and investment.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019444.jpg
This document is a scanned page from 'Frontlines' magazine (Winter 2008 issue) containing two articles: 'Biologists Dig Deeper' about climate change research at Canada's Biotron Institute, and 'Peace in The Garden' about intercultural community gardens in Germany. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019444' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein/Maxwell inquiries given the context of such dumps, though the specific text on this page is unrelated to Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019291.jpg
This document is page 57 of a Freedom House report titled 'Authoritarianism Comes Calling,' likely published in early 2017. It details the rise of authoritarian methods globally, specifically highlighting Russia's interference in the 2016 US election, the election of Donald Trump, Brexit, and the erosion of liberal values in China (mentioning 'social credit'). While the document contains a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it is part of a larger congressional investigation, this specific page does not mention Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019284.jpg
This document appears to be page 50 of a report titled 'BREAKING DOWN DEMOCRACY,' produced or collected by the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019284). The text focuses entirely on geopolitical analysis regarding Russian aggression, specifically detailing the invasion of Ukraine, the annexation of Crimea, threats to the Baltic states and Poland, and military interventions in Syria. While the prompt identifies this as an 'Epstein-related document,' the specific content of this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates; it is likely a document included in a larger discovery batch involving foreign relations or policy research.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019282.jpg
This document is page 48 of a report titled 'Breaking Down Democracy,' bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019282. It analyzes Russian geopolitical strategies under Vladimir Putin, specifically focusing on military invasions (Georgia, Ukraine), the use of 'frozen conflicts' to maintain influence, and the concept of the 'Russian world' to justify intervention. It concludes with a case study on the history of Estonia and its relationship with Russia and its own ethnic Russian minority.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019267.jpg
This document appears to be page 33 of a Freedom House report discussing censorship and historical revisionism in authoritarian regimes, specifically focusing on China under Xi Jinping and Russia under Putin. It details how the Chinese Communist Party suppresses discussion of the Cultural Revolution, the Great Leap Forward, and the Tiananmen Square massacre, while promoting nationalism and Maoist imagery. It also draws parallels to Russia's rehabilitation of Stalin and contrasts these approaches with countries like Germany and South Africa that have confronted their difficult histories. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019264.jpg
This document analyzes the historical revisionism employed by the modern Russian leadership, particularly Vladimir Putin, to justify authoritarianism and anti-Western sentiment. It details how the regime reinterprets events like the Hitler-Stalin pact and the Cold War while systematically erasing the legacy of dissident Andrey Sakharov to suppress democratic ideals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019260.jpg
This document discusses the legislative strategies used by authoritarian regimes, particularly Russia, to suppress civil society and political opposition. It details the implementation of the 2012 "foreign agents" law and the 2015 "undesirables" law, which target NGOs receiving foreign funding and foreign organizations deemed threats, respectively, effectively criminalizing dissent and isolating domestic activists.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019209.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a writing by investigative journalist Edward Jay Epstein (not Jeffrey Epstein) regarding Edward Snowden. It details Snowden's interactions with Russian authorities and his lawyer, Anatoly Kucherena, specifically confirming that Snowden brought secret NSA documents to Moscow that had not been previously released to journalists in Hong Kong. The text cites a House Intelligence Committee report alleging ongoing contact between Snowden and Russian intelligence services.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031854.jpg
This document appears to be page 21 of a larger file, containing the conclusion of an article or book review written by Ferguson (likely Niall Ferguson) about Henry Kissinger. The text analyzes US-China relations, contrasting the views of nationalist Chinese writers like Liu Mingfu with Kissinger's hope for a 'Pacific Community.' It includes a significant quote from Richard Nixon predicting China's rise to global leadership. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031853.jpg
This document appears to be page 20 of a larger text, likely a book or long-form article, analyzing Henry Kissinger's geopolitical philosophy regarding China. It contrasts American diplomatic impatience with Chinese strategic patience (referencing Sun Tzu and Mao) and warns of potential future conflict based on cultural misunderstandings of deterrence versus preemption. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number, indicating it was part of a document production for a congressional investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031761.jpg
The document is a page from a House Oversight record (031761) discussing the LaRouche movement's drastic shift in attitude toward Donald Trump during the 2016 election. It details how the organization went from mocking Trump with satirical songs to viewing him as a strategic ally against the 'British Empire' after Hillary Clinton's defeat. It also profiles Helga LaRouche as the founder of the Schiller Institute and notes her influence over her husband.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031586.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a political analysis article written by Adrien Morin on May 18, 2014. It discusses the Syrian civil war, the diplomatic standoff at the UN caused by Russian and Chinese vetoes, and Western concerns regarding Chinese foreign policy and 'realpolitik.' The document includes a House Oversight footer (031586), suggesting it was part of a production of documents to Congress.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031581.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a geopolitical report or analysis produced to the House Oversight Committee (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031581). It analyzes the lack of political will for a settlement in Cyprus, examining the motivations of Turkey, Greece, Britain, and Russia, while specifically noting Russian involvement in 'bleaching business' (money laundering). The document can be dated to approximately May 2014 based on the reference to Vice President Joe Biden's 'upcoming visit this week,' which occurred in May of that year.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025998.jpg
This document is page 21 of a 'Global Equity Volatility Insights' report produced by Bank of America Merrill Lynch, dated August 9, 2016. It contains statistical data tables (Table 9 and Table 10) detailing market volatility metrics for developed and emerging markets as of August 5, 2016. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025998', indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations involving financial records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016539.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol 103) discussing the complexities of federal versus state jurisdiction in cases of police violence and 'excessive use of force.' It analyzes the high 'mens rea' standard required for federal prosecution and compares the US system to those of Germany, Canada, and Australia. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, possibly related to arguments about federal jurisdiction or deaths in custody.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) discussing federalism, prosecutorial discretion, and the expansion of federal law enforcement (including the FBI) to address local corruption and bias. The footnotes provide a comparative legal analysis, citing German laws (StPO) regarding the mandatory duty to prosecute crimes, contrasting it with discretionary powers. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531' and bears the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney), suggesting it was part of a legal file or submission regarding arguments about prosecutorial oversight or misconduct.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity