Judge Calabresi
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00009046.jpg
Page 45 of a legal filing (Document 613) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed in February 2022. The text presents a legal argument regarding 'Inferred Bias' and 'Actual Bias' in jurors, citing the precedent *Torres*. The defense argues that, similar to *Torres*, a juror in the current case (implied to be the Maxwell trial) was subject to conduct closely approximating that of the defendant, creating a risk of unconscious bias.
DOJ-OGR-00009737.jpg
This document is page 45 of a legal filing (Document 642) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. The text presents legal arguments regarding 'Inferred bias' and 'Actual bias' in jurors, citing the precedent case 'Torres' extensively. It argues that bias should be inferred when a juror's past experiences or conduct closely approximate that of the defendant, implying this legal standard applies to the current case (likely referring to Juror 50 in the Maxwell trial).
DOJ-OGR-00002996.jpg
This document is page 35 (pacer page 62) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text is a legal analysis rejecting Maxwell's arguments to dismiss the indictment based on the statute of limitations. The court distinguishes the precedents cited by Maxwell (specifically Thom v. Ashcroft and Toussie v. United States), arguing that they do not prevent the retroactive application of the relevant statute of limitations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity