DOJ-OGR-00009541.jpg

560 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 560 KB
Summary

This document is a letter dated February 24, 2022, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter proposes limited redactions to a court Opinion and Order in response to a prior court order. Appended to the letter is a handwritten order from Judge Nathan, dated February 25, 2022, approving the proposed redactions to ensure the integrity of a forthcoming hearing.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorney
Author of the letter, representing the defense.
Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge
Recipient of the letter and the judge presiding over the case who issued the order approving the redactions.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Named as the defendant in the case caption 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM company
The law firm represented on the letterhead, sending the letter.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (USDC SDNY) government agency
The court where the case is being heard, as indicated by the recipient's title, address, and the filing stamp.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-02-24
The Court issued an order (Dkt. 610) to which this letter is a response.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2022-02-25
The letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim was electronically filed with the court as Document 618.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2022-02-25
Judge Alison J. Nathan approved the defense's proposed redactions.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Locations (3)

Location Context
The address of the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
The address of Judge Alison J. Nathan.
The city where both the law office and the courthouse are located.

Relationships (2)

Bobbi C. Sternheim professional Ghislaine Maxwell
Bobbi C. Sternheim is writing on behalf of 'the defense' in the case of 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', indicating she is Maxwell's defense attorney.
Bobbi C. Sternheim professional Alison J. Nathan
Sternheim, as an attorney, is addressing Judge Nathan, who is presiding over her client's case.

Key Quotes (2)

"In response to today’s Court Order (Dkt. 610), the defense proposes limited redactions to the attached Opinion and Order, dated February 24, 2022, filed under temporary seal."
Source
— Bobbi C. Sternheim (The main body of the letter explaining its purpose.)
DOJ-OGR-00009541.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court approves the Defense's proposed redactions, which are narrowly tailored to redact specific categories of questions the Court may ask at the forthcoming hearing."
Source
— Alison J. Nathan (The beginning of the judge's handwritten order approving the defense's request.)
DOJ-OGR-00009541.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,299 characters)

Case: 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 618 Filed 02/25/22 Page 1 of 1
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
212-243-1100 • Main
917-912-9698 • Cell
888-587-4737 • Fax
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
bcsternheim@mac.com
February 24, 2022
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 2/25/22
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
S2 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
In response to today’s Court Order (Dkt. 610), the defense proposes limited redactions to the attached Opinion and Order, dated February 24, 2022, filed under temporary seal.
Very truly yours,
/s/
BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
Attachment (under temporary seal)
cc: Counsel of Record
The Court approves the Defense's proposed redactions, which are narrowly tailored to redact specific categories of questions the Court may ask at the forthcoming hearing. Consistent with this Court's prior order, such redactions help ensure the integrity of the forthcoming hearing. See Dkt. No. 596. The Court will docket the redacted Opinion & Order. As noted in the prior order, the redactions will be promptly unsealed following the hearing.
SO ORDERED.
[Signature of Alison J. Nathan]
2/25/22
DOJ-OGR-00009541

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document