Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror candidate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cynthia Hopkins
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00005574.jpg
This legal document, part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, addresses the defense's arguments against a motion, asserting that the Government's actions are not merely tactical but aimed at protecting victims. It emphasizes the importance of privacy safeguards for Minor Victims, including the use of pseudonyms and the sealing of exhibits containing identifying information, while maintaining public and press access to the trial and most evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00005572.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is part of a court case where the Government is arguing against a defendant's motion. The Government contends that the defendant has not shown a 'particularized need' to publicly disclose the true names of the 'Minor Victims' during trial. The Government asserts that the defendant already knows the victims' identities and can conduct a thorough cross-examination without this public disclosure, which would protect the victims' privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00005533.jpg
This document outlines the terms of a plea agreement between Epstein and the State Attorney's Office for a case in Palm Beach County. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of minors, requiring him to register as a sex offender. In exchange, a binding recommendation is made for a 30-month sentence, consisting of 18 months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control.
DOJ-OGR-00005520.jpg
This is page 65 of 69 from a court filing (Document 382) in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 29, 2021. The defense argues that the burden of proof lies solely with the government and criticizes the prosecution's concerns about jury confusion. Specifically, under Section XI, the defense asserts that Maxwell was the 'prevailing party' in a previous civil litigation based on the same facts, a point the government seemingly disputes.
DOJ-OGR-00005513.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, arguing that the Court should deny the government's motion to compel her to provide pre-trial notice of certain evidence. The defense asserts there is no legal authority for this demand and that the relevant rules, specifically Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), place the burden of providing such notice on the prosecution, not the defendant. The document aims to prevent the defendant from having to disclose her evidence strategy concerning her alleged absence when Epstein committed abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00005512.jpg
This legal document is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, arguing against the government's request to preclude evidence of her 'good acts.' The defense asserts that evidence of Ms. Maxwell's absence during Mr. Epstein's alleged abuse of certain victims is admissible and crucial for demonstrating her lack of intent or knowledge, and that the government's motion to block this evidence is premature and legally flawed.
DOJ-OGR-00005398.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 380 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 29, 2021. In it, the Government requests that the Court implement protective measures for several minor victims and related witnesses, such as using pseudonyms or first names only during trial and sealing exhibits containing their full names. The filing argues that these measures are necessary to protect the victims from harassment and are legally permissible limitations on the defendant's Confrontation Clause rights.
DOJ-OGR-00005397.jpg
This legal document is a motion filed by the Government on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government requests that the Court allow certain minor victim witnesses to testify under pseudonyms or first names to protect their privacy during the upcoming trial, citing the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The motion details the expected testimony of 'Minor Victim-4' regarding her recruitment by 'Minor Victim-5' and her subsequent recruitment of 'Minor Victim-6'.
DOJ-OGR-00005373.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions and jury instructions. It specifically highlights disputes between the Government and the Defense regarding whether potential jurors should be asked live questions about their knowledge of or dealings with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text includes standard admonitions to jurors not to discuss the case and to report any outside communication attempts.
DOJ-OGR-00005352.jpg
This document is page 30 of a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It contains questions assessing a prospective juror's impartiality, privacy concerns regarding their answers, and willingness to adhere to court instructions regarding outside information and case discussion.
DOJ-OGR-00005343.jpg
This document is page 21 of a court filing (Document 367) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains a draft juror questionnaire focusing on potential jurors' opinions on sex trafficking laws and personal history with sexual abuse. The document highlights a legal dispute where the Government objects to specific questions proposed by the Defense (highlighted in green text) regarding the jurors' personal victimization history, arguing they are inappropriate, while the Defense argues these questions are necessary to identify bias against Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00005334.jpg
This document is a blank juror questionnaire from legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The form is designed to screen potential jurors by asking about their past jury service, involvement in legal proceedings (as a plaintiff, defendant, or witness), and any experiences that might affect their ability to be fair and impartial. It is page 12 of a 35-page document.
DOJ-OGR-00005329.jpg
This document is page 7 of a juror questionnaire for a federal criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It questions potential jurors on their decision-making styles and views on wealth, while also outlining the trial schedule from November 16 to December 24, 2021. The document includes several objections from the Government, which argues that certain questions are too vague to be used for a for-cause challenge.
DOJ-OGR-00005324.jpg
This document is a jury instruction sheet for the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on October 22, 2021. It summarizes the six-count indictment against Maxwell, which alleges she conspired with and aided Jeffrey Epstein in sex trafficking of minors between 1994 and 2004. The document provides strict instructions to potential jurors, prohibiting them from conducting outside research or discussing the case, and notes the trial is set to begin on November 29, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00005283.jpg
This document is a jury questionnaire for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. It is designed to assess a potential juror's ability to serve by asking about unmovable commitments during the jury selection period (November 16-19, 2021) and the estimated trial period (November 29, 2021, to January 15, 2022). The form also inquires about international travel plans and any circumstances that might cause serious hardship or extreme inconvenience.
DOJ-OGR-00005235.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a Government filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 10/15/21) addressing defense complaints regarding legal mail delays at the MDC. The Government argues that a request for 1-day mail turnaround is burdensome given the facility houses 1,700 inmates. It details the timeline of a specific hard drive delivery: sent Oct 11, received Oct 12, delayed Oct 13 due to an 'institutional emergency,' and personally delivered to the defendant by MDC legal counsel on Oct 14, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00002682.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, summarizes the allegations against Ms. Maxwell from an indictment. It details four counts related to violations of the Mann Act between 1994 and 1997, including substantive violations and conspiracy with Jeffrey Epstein and others. The allegations specify that Maxwell enticed and caused 'Accuser-1' to travel from Florida to New York for illegal sex acts with Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00002618.jpg
This document is page 6 of a 7-page legal agreement, filed on February 4, 2008, between Epstein and the United States. In this section, Epstein formally waives his constitutional rights to a speedy trial (Sixth Amendment) and to an indictment by a grand jury (Fifth Amendment). This waiver is a condition for the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida to defer his prosecution, with the understanding that any breach of the agreement by Epstein would allow the government to prosecute him for any federal offenses.
DOJ-OGR-00020377.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the Government in response to an appeal by Maxwell regarding her pretrial confinement conditions. The Government argues that Maxwell's complaints about disruptive nighttime flashlight checks are unsubstantiated and do not demonstrably interfere with her trial preparation. The document also refutes Maxwell's accusations of misrepresentation, clarifying a statement made by Government counsel and explaining an acknowledged inaccuracy in information received from the MDC.
DOJ-OGR-00020367.jpg
This legal document outlines the procedural history of a case involving a defendant named Maxwell. After Maxwell appealed two of Judge Nathan's bail decisions and was denied pretrial release on April 27, 2021, she did not file a renewed motion. Instead, on April 29, 2021, she submitted a letter to Judge Nathan requesting the court to order the MDC to stop or justify the 15-minute light surveillance that was disrupting her sleep.
DOJ-OGR-00020366.jpg
This legal document details the court's denial of a bail application filed by the defendant, Maxwell, on February 23, 2021. Judge Nathan found Maxwell's arguments about her confinement conditions unpersuasive and reiterated that her detention was necessary due to her being a flight risk, citing her substantial international ties, financial resources, and a "lack of candor regarding her assets" at the time of her arrest. The judge concluded that even a substantial bail package could not reasonably assure Maxwell's future appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00020331.jpg
This legal document argues that the government misrepresented information to the court regarding the treatment of inmate Ms. Maxwell. The government initially claimed that flashlight checks every 15 minutes were a routine procedure, but later admitted in a letter that Ms. Maxwell is the only inmate subjected to this treatment. The document contends this is a form of mistreatment being justified without proper evidence, such as an affidavit.
DOJ-OGR-00020327.jpg
This legal document is a renewed motion for bond on behalf of appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, dated May 17, 2021. The motion argues against the harsh conditions of her confinement, specifically citing sleep deprivation caused by flashlight checks every 15 minutes for over 318 days. The document refutes the government's justifications for these measures—such as suicide risk or the high-profile nature of the case—as nonsensical and abusive.
DOJ-OGR-00005845.jpg
This legal document is a filing from the Government in response to a defense motion regarding co-conspirator statements. The Government refutes the defense's accusation that failing to provide an index of statements is an 'invitation to manufacture evidence,' calling the allegation baseless and offensive. The filing also addresses the defense's argument about the difficulty of calling co-conspirators as witnesses, citing a previous court opinion that questioned the credibility of potential testimony from Epstein.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-09-17 | Received | Burman, Critton, ... | Court | $138.80 | Invoice for cancelled deposition services (Appe... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity