Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Juror 50
|
Juror candidate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cynthia Hopkins
|
Employee |
1
|
1 |
DOJ-OGR-00001112.jpg
This legal document is part of a bail application for Ms. Maxwell, arguing she should be granted bail under strict conditions. The filing asserts that she has deep family ties to the United States, primarily through her spouse, and is supported by numerous friends and family members who have written letters and agreed to act as sureties, posting significant financial bonds. This is intended to counter the Court's previous concern that she lacked significant ties to the country and was a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00001098.jpg
This document is the table of contents for a legal filing, specifically a memorandum in support of reconsidering a bail decision for Ms. Maxwell. The arguments outlined focus on her strong family ties in the United States, her willingness to provide financial transparency, and refuting the government's claims that she was a flight risk or was hiding prior to her arrest. The filing also asserts that she has waived extradition rights and that the proposed bail package is more than sufficient to ensure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001091.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against granting bail to the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The prosecution contends that she possesses significant financial resources, has demonstrated sophistication in hiding herself and her assets, and has an extraordinary capacity to evade detection, as evidenced by her behavior after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. The document concludes that even a bail package with electronic monitoring would be insufficient to prevent her from fleeing.
DOJ-OGR-00000997.jpg
This legal document argues that a defendant should be denied bail and home confinement. The prosecution contends the defendant is a significant flight risk due to her access to over $20 million in financial resources, her refusal to account for this wealth, and her ability to maintain relationships remotely. The document cites several legal precedents to argue that GPS ankle-bracelet monitoring is not a reliable means of preventing flight.
DOJ-OGR-00000989.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the Government arguing against granting bail to the defendant in case 20-cr-00330-AJN. The Government asserts its case is strong, based on detailed testimony from multiple victims about predatory conduct in the 1990s, which is corroborated by evidence such as flight records and diary entries. The Government expresses concern that bailing the defendant would deny justice to the victims and states it will urge the Court to deny bail at a hearing on July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00000971.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, has successfully rebutted the legal presumption that she is a flight risk. It asserts that the government has failed to meet its burden of proving that no set of bail conditions could reasonably ensure her appearance in court. The document cites several legal precedents to support its claim that the Court should order Ms. Maxwell's release under her proposed conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00000963.jpg
This legal document argues for Ms. Maxwell's bail, asserting that the government's position on her danger to the community is inconsistent with its stance on Epstein. It highlights the COVID-19 pandemic as a health risk and an impediment to her defense, and contends that Ms. Maxwell is not a flight risk due to her strong community ties, U.S. citizenship, lack of criminal record, and continued presence in the U.S. since Epstein's arrest.
DOJ-OGR-00000931.jpg
This legal document argues that the trial court improperly denied bail to Ghislaine Maxwell by relying on the government's proffer, which was based on an indictment. The author contends that an indictment is merely an accusation and not evidence, citing legal precedent and pattern jury instructions from the Third Circuit to support this claim. The document asserts that the court should order Maxwell's release.
DOJ-OGR-00000886.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing legal filings and orders from late July 2020. It includes entries regarding motions for a protective order, responses from both the defense and prosecution, and a Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan resolving disputes over the protective order's language concerning victim identification and the use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00000873.jpg
This legal document, filed on September 22, 2021, is a court memorandum outlining the Court's rejection of the Defendant's proposed conditions to mitigate her flight risk. The Court finds that the Defendant's offers to renounce her UK and French citizenship and to have a retired federal judge oversee her finances are insufficient to assure her appearance at future proceedings. The Court remains concerned about her ability to delay or resist extradition, especially given her substantial international ties.
DOJ-OGR-00000871.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion denying a defendant's third motion for bail. The Court concludes that the defendant remains a significant flight risk, and her new proposals—renouncing her French and British citizenship and placing assets in an account monitored by a retired judge—are insufficient to mitigate this risk. The Court highlights the unclear validity and practical impact of the citizenship renunciations, particularly citing a French official's opinion that being a French national is an "insuperable obstacle" to removal.
DOJ-OGR-00000847.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket sheet for the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. It records various court orders, including the granting of a detention motion, an arraignment where Maxwell pleaded not guilty, scheduling for discovery and trial, and rulings on motions regarding extrajudicial statements. Key participants include Judge Alison J. Nathan, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and various attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000811.jpg
This document is a page from a court order denying bail for Jeffrey Epstein. The court determines that the defendant poses a significant flight risk due to his wealth, overseas ties (specifically in Paris), and the severity of the potential sentence (45 years). The court cites precedent such as United States v. Abdullahu to support the decision that no conditions can reasonably assure his appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00000810.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against the release of the defendant, Mr. Epstein, pending trial. It presents evidence that he is a serious flight risk due to his wealth, international travel, and significant ties to Brazil, a country without an extradition treaty with the U.S. The document also cites allegations of witness tampering made by victims' attorney David Boies and concludes that no conditions, including an armed guard, would be sufficient to ensure Mr. Epstein's appearance at trial, labeling him a danger to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00000785.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against granting pretrial release (bail) to the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The prosecution (The Government) contends that under federal law (§ 3142), the nature of the charges (sex trafficking of minors) creates a presumption for detention. The document further cites the Government's belief that Mr. Epstein poses a danger to the community and is likely to intimidate witnesses and obstruct justice if released.
DOJ-OGR-00000776.jpg
This document is the second page of a court filing (Case 19-2221) dated July 23, 2019. It provides procedural instructions for attorneys and pro se parties regarding updating contact information via PACER or mail, as well as guidelines for reviewing case captions and appellate designations pursuant to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP).
DOJ-OGR-00000770.jpg
This legal document, filed on behalf of victim Annie Farmer by her counsel Sigrid S. McCawley, argues for the unsealing of grand jury transcripts related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing supports redacting victims' personal information for privacy but strongly opposes redacting the names of co-conspirators and enablers, asserting that their identities should be public to ensure accountability and justice. It references other civil lawsuits against entities like JP Morgan and Deutsche Bank as part of a broader effort to hold third parties involved in the sex-trafficking scheme accountable.
DOJ-OGR-00000750.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 29, 2025, argues for the disclosure of grand jury materials. It analyzes legal precedents, noting that while the Government may oppose disclosure, factors like public interest can be overriding. The document states that Defendant Epstein is deceased and cannot assert a position, while Defendant Maxwell intends to respond, and argues that the significant public interest in the crimes of Epstein and Maxwell justifies disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00000748.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 29, 2025, outlines a court order issued on July 22, 2025. The Court has directed the Government to file a legal memorandum and submit extensive materials concerning the grand jury proceedings of Epstein and Maxwell. This includes indices, complete transcripts, proposed redactions, and a statement on whether victims were notified, all in relation to a motion to unseal the grand jury records.
DOJ-OGR-00000598.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court order from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB, filed on July 25, 2019, related to Jeffrey Epstein. The order prohibits the defense team (including the Defendant, counsel, staff, and experts) from publicly filing any information from the Discovery materials without prior authorization from the Government or the Court. It mandates that any court filings incorporating Discovery information must be filed under seal and also addresses the handling of materials marked as "confidential" by the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00000591.jpg
This document is a page from a court order filed on July 25, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. It defines 'Highly Confidential Information' as including images of nude or partially-nude individuals and sets forth strict rules for its handling by the defense. The order explicitly states that this information cannot be copied or disseminated and that the Defendant is only permitted to review it under the direct supervision of their defense counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00000518.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript where a judge is addressing the legal parties in a case involving Mr. Epstein. The judge requests information on any other legal proceedings in Florida, the Virgin Islands, or New Mexico related to Epstein's sex offender status. The judge also discusses a 'cursory' and unhelpful financial summary of Epstein's assets submitted by the defense, stating an inclination to place it on the public docket and asking for arguments from both sides.
DOJ-OGR-00000501.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 18, 2019, critiques Mr. Epstein's proposed bail package, arguing that his home confinement plan involves excessive judicial oversight and raises practical concerns about private security. It also dismisses the defense's offer of an anticipatory extradition waiver as an 'empty gesture,' citing the Department of Justice's view that such waivers are not binding and the risk of the defendant fleeing to a non-extradition jurisdiction.
DOJ-OGR-00000494.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues for the pre-trial detention of the defendant, Mr. Epstein. The prosecution asserts that the severity of the charges, which carry a maximum sentence of 45 years, creates a presumption for remand. The document outlines the strength of the evidence, including victim and witness testimony, physical evidence, and reports of witness tampering, and notes Mr. Epstein's prior felony convictions in Florida involving minors.
DOJ-OGR-00000482.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing from July 18, 2019, argues against granting bail to Jeffrey Epstein. It details testimony from alleged victim Courtney Wild, who described being abused by Epstein from age 14 and expressed fear for other girls' safety. The filing counters the defense's argument that Epstein is disciplined, asserting instead that his alleged sexual conduct is an uncontrollable, addictive behavior that poses a continued threat to young girls.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-09-17 | Received | Burman, Critton, ... | Court | $138.80 | Invoice for cancelled deposition services (Appe... | View |
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity