victims
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
9
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Brad Edwards
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Wendy Olsen
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
juror
|
Shared experience |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Other victims
|
Recruitment |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional prosecutor affected parties |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Financial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Boise
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Professional counsel for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | First Scheme (Count Three) | Epstein's properties | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Start of alleged criminal conduct by Epstein and Maxwell | Multiple (NY, FL, USVI, NM) | View |
| 1990-01-01 | Criminal conduct | The time period during which the defendant's alleged criminal conduct, including a scheme to groo... | N/A | View |
| -2007-09-24 | Meeting | Villafaña and case agents met with victims to discuss their opinions on resolving the case. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019308.jpg
Page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing the protocol for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery. It defines such information as including the identities of victims and witnesses, while noting that publicly self-identified victims are not confidential. It also establishes a mechanism for Defense Counsel to challenge the Government's confidentiality designations.
DOJ-OGR-00010661.jpg
This document is page 2 of a government filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 24, 2022. The Government argues that victims have a right to be heard at sentencing and opposes the defendant's request to redact victim impact statements, citing that privacy interests belong to the victims, not the defendant. The filing cites legal precedents (Eberhard, Lugosch) regarding the Court's discretion to accept information and the standards for sealing documents.
DOJ-OGR-00010527.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on June 21, 2022. It establishes deadlines for filing objections and non-objected statements on June 24, 2022. Crucially, it orders the Government to confirm by noon on June 22, 2022, that victims have been notified of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
DOJ-OGR-00003099.jpg
This document is page 165 of a legal filing (Document 204) from April 2021 in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecution argues against the defendant's motion to sever Counts Five and Six, stating that the perjury charges and sex abuse charges are logically connected by a common scheme. The text cites Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 8(a) and various case precedents to support the joinder of offenses.
DOJ-OGR-00004693.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned about eight previously discussed victims, specifically regarding whether they had histories of illicit drug use or mental health issues. The witness confirms knowledge of these issues, but the specific details provided in the answer are fully redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00005864.jpg
This page from a legal filing (Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) outlines the Government's argument for admitting evidence of rape. The prosecution rebuts defense claims that such evidence is irrelevant or overly inflammatory (Rule 403), asserting that the victims' testimony is necessary to explain the complex, multi-year relationships between the defendant, Epstein, and the victims. The text clarifies that the Indictment charges conspiracies for 'sexual activity' and 'commercial sex acts,' not merely 'sexualized massages' as the defense suggested.
DOJ-OGR-00005396.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from the Government, filed on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government submits nine motions in limine to the Court, seeking to set the rules for an upcoming trial. The motions aim to protect victims' privacy, admit certain statements, and preclude the defense from introducing what the Government considers irrelevant, confusing, or improper evidence and arguments, such as questioning law enforcement decisions or attempting to garner sympathy for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00011704.jpg
This document is a transcript of an opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in a criminal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecution outlines its case against an unnamed defendant, alleging their involvement with Jeffrey Epstein in the abuse of underage victims. The statement details the evidence to be presented, including testimony from victims' relatives, Epstein's pilots and staff, and law enforcement who searched Epstein's Palm Beach and New York residences, to establish the defendant's role and efforts to create a 'culture of silence'.
DOJ-OGR-00011614.jpg
This document is page 95 of a court transcript from the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell on July 22, 2022. The judge rejects Maxwell's claims regarding poor treatment at the MDC and lack of preparation time, noting a pattern of dishonesty and 'deflection of blame' consistent with her perjury in a civil deposition. While acknowledging that Maxwell and her attorney Ms. Sternheim expressed sympathy for the victims' suffering, the judge emphasizes that Maxwell failed to express acceptance of responsibility.
DOJ-OGR-00011611.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The judge outlines the rationale for a substantial sentence, citing the gravity of the offense, the harm to victims, and the need for general deterrence against sexual abuse and trafficking of minors. The judge emphasizes that Maxwell's wealth and status do not place her above the law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010552.jpg
This document is page 212 from a book authored by James Patterson, likely 'Filthy Rich', which has been included in House Oversight Committee records (Bates stamp 010552). It features a statement signed by former U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta defending the prosecutorial decisions made in the Epstein case, arguing that critics were not privy to the specific evidence and trial assessments made at the time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023008.jpg
This document is a timeline, likely from a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, detailing the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein between May 2008 and July 2009. It covers his guilty plea to state solicitation charges, his 18-month sentencing, the subsequent work release program where he spent 12 hours a day at his office, and his early release in 2009. The text also highlights the Miami Herald's investigative work ('Perversion of Justice') in exposing the deal and the lack of notification provided to victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Damages pursuant to 18 USC 2255. | View |
| N/A | Received | [Redacted Female ... | victims | $0.00 | Financial incentives offered for not speaking w... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to victims' right to seek dam... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement to a means for victims to obtain mone... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Monetary damages for victims mentioned as a req... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | General reference to 'settlement payments made ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Agreement to pay attorney fees for victims and ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Mention of 'significant monetary settlements to... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/A... | victims | $0.00 | Victims were paid 'hundreds of dollars' after a... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein, Maxwell,... | victims | $0.00 | Cash payments made in connection with each sexu... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Reference to potential monetary damages victims... | View |
| N/A | Paid | victims | Scammers | $250,000.00 | Example amount cited by Epstein regarding how t... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Paid millions of dollars in civil compensation ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Cash settlements in civil suits requiring non-d... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $200.00 | Typical payment per visit for massage sessions ... | View |
| N/A | Received | The Defendant | victims | $0.00 | Promised to help pay for school as part of groo... | View |
| N/A | Received | Restitution Mecha... | victims | $150,000.00 | Mentioned by Sloman as a restitution amount tha... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein/Maxwell | victims | $0.00 | Giving them money and gifts (general mention) | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Cash settlements in civil suits. | View |
| N/A | Received | Compensation Fund | victims | $0.00 | Reference to a compensation fund or incentive f... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | NPA requirement to provide monetary damages/unc... | View |
| N/A | Received | Epstein/Maxwell (... | victims | $0.00 | Juror mentions victims 'returning repeatedly fo... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Confidential financial settlements reached afte... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Restitution made to victims as part of the nego... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | victims | $0.00 | Potential damages paid to victims who elect to ... | View |
Arranging massage appointments
The transcript describes Sarah Kellen's role in earlier years as 'calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.'
CVRA Rights Information
An FBI pamphlet containing CVRA rights information was provided to victims when a letter was not.
Victim Notification
USAO and FBI letters were hand-delivered to some victims following in-person interviews to notify them of their rights.
Victim contacts with the USAO and the FBI
OPR reviewed written submissions from victims concerning their contacts with the USAO and the FBI.
Victim Notification
Notification letters issued to victims.
Case Status
Standard form language stating the case was 'under investigation' and failing to inform them of the NPA.
Smoking marijuana and drinking
Chat logs on myspace.com used by defense lawyers.
Abuse Allegations
Details of massages, sexual activity, and threats.
Scheduling
Victims scheduled appointments with Epstein's assistants.
Motion to unseal
Notice provided to all but one victim referenced in grand jury transcripts regarding the motion to unseal.
Massage appointments
Calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.
Motion to unseal
Court asks if Government provided notice to victims regarding the motion to unseal.
Initiation of investigation
Letters informing victims that the FBI had initiated an investigation.
Case Information
Letters, telephone calls, emails, numeric pager messages, or faxes regarding case events, custody status, and court hearings.
Victim Impact Statements
Request to submit letters and statements to the record.
Arranging massage appointments
Calling victims and arranging for massage appointments.
N/A
Hypothetical 'absence of phone calls' mentioned as a potential argument by the defense regarding missing phone records.
Marijuana and drinking
Chats on myspace.com used by defense to attack victim credibility.
Status of Investigation
Letters describing the investigation as ongoing, which the court found to be misleading.
Notice of unsealing
Notice given only after the Court inquired; lack of advance notice alarmed victims.
N/A
Recovered from residence; include names and contact information.
Victim Notification / CVRA Rights
Informed victims of investigation, CVRA rights, counseling options, and warned about defense investigators.
Submissions regarding redactions
Deadline for victims identified in transcripts to submit redaction requests.
Victim submissions
The order mentions letters submitted by or on behalf of victims, which were due on August 5, 2025.
Position on proposed disclosure
Letters from victims to the Court setting out their positions on a proposed disclosure, which are due by August 5, 2025.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity