prosecutors
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jane
|
Professional investigative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victims
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED person]
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
GOVERNMENT
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein's lawyers
|
Professional adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective [Redacted]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Detective [Redacted]
|
Professional collaborative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Espinosa
|
Interview subject |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-25 | N/A | Initial Conference | Courtroom 15D, United State... | View |
| 2019-09-10 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-08-26 | N/A | Proposed meeting between Ms. [Redacted] and prosecutors. | New York | View |
| 2019-08-26 | N/A | Scheduled meeting between prosecutors and clients/witnesses. | New York, 12:00 p.m. | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Bail Determination Hearing | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2019-07-18 | N/A | Bail Decision Hearing | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Bail Hearing for Jeffrey Epstein | US District Court, SDNY | View |
| 2019-07-15 | N/A | Anticipated Bail Hearing (referred to as 'Monday') | Court | View |
| 2019-07-09 | N/A | Bail hearing where judge asked about the effect of the discovered photos. | Court | View |
| 2019-07-08 | N/A | Court Conference before Judge Berman. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-03-01 | N/A | Previous conversation between Robert Lewis and prosecutors regarding the witness speaking to them. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Nolle prosequi submitted for Epstein case following his death. | Court | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Prosecutors requested a protective order in a court filing to prevent premature disclosure of doc... | N/A | View |
| 2018-01-01 | N/A | Grand Jury proceedings | Court | View |
| 2008-07-11 | Hearing | A court hearing where it was acknowledged that prosecutors had spoken to Petitioners about what h... | N/A | View |
| 2008-07-07 | N/A | Signing of plea agreement with Epstein. | State Court (implied Florida) | View |
| 2008-07-01 | N/A | Federal court hearing where declarant learned of the secret plea deal. | Federal Court | View |
| 2008-03-01 | N/A | Meeting regarding the case arguments. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-01-31 | N/A | FBI and prosecutors interviewed additional victims and reinterviewed previous victims. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Federal immunity deal granted to Epstein and co-conspirators. | Miami | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Federal immunity deal for Epstein and co-conspirators. | Federal Court | View |
| 2007-12-21 | N/A | Scheduled date mentioned in email, likely for the plea conference | West Palm Beach (implied) | View |
| 2007-12-07 | N/A | Deadline set by Acosta for prosecutors not to issue victim notification letters (5 p.m. Friday). | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-20 | N/A | Negotiations regarding federal charges for a plea agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2007-09-20 | Plea negotiation | The defense rejected the federal plea option and resumed negotiations for an NPA involving only s... | N/A | View |
EFTA00038822.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and a redacted individual. They are scheduling a video conference for August 24, 2020, involving prosecutors. The conversation touches on the recipient's recovery from oral surgery, a third party's upcoming radiation treatment, and the option to involve a person named 'Sigrid' in the proceedings.
EFTA00038752.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and a redacted individual. The correspondence concerns scheduling a video conference involving prosecutors, potentially regarding an investigation. The emails discuss the scheduling logistics around the recipient's recovery from oral surgery and another individual's radiation treatment, while also offering the option to involve 'Sigrid' (likely an attorney).
EFTA00038749.pdf
An email chain from December 2020 to January 2021 between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and a witness/subject regarding the scheduling of a video interview. The interview, originally set for January 5, 2021, was cancelled by the respondent due to being on vacation and dealing with a family member in hospice care. The respondent proposed rescheduling for the last week of January.
EFTA00038748.pdf
This document is an email dated December 8, 2020, from a Detective named Paul (affiliated with NYPD/FBI) to a redacted recipient. The email coordinates scheduling a 'Video Interview' for January 5th (presumably 2021) at 1 PM, involving the sender, his FBI Special Agent partner, and prosecutors. The document contains significant redactions regarding names and contact information.
EFTA00038735.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 2020 between a Detective from the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force and a witness/victim (name redacted). They are scheduling a video conference with prosecutors for August 24, 2020. The emails discuss logistical details, the recipient's recent oral surgery, a family member's radiation treatment, and the option to have 'Sigrid' (likely attorney Sigrid McCawley) involved in the discussion.
EFTA00038729.pdf
An email dated August 10, 2020, from a Detective in the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force to a redacted recipient. The detective discusses scheduling a video conference with prosecutors and mentions that the recipient can involve 'Sigrid' (likely attorney Sigrid McCawley) if they prefer.
EFTA00022989.pdf
This document contains notes from a teleconference between U.S. prosecutors/FBI and counsel for Prince Andrew, dated January 10, 2020. The notes outline the government's request for a voluntary, consensual interview with Prince Andrew regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The document details the ground rules for such an interview (not recorded, not under oath, but lying is a crime) and discusses his classification as a 'subject' rather than a 'target' or 'witness' at that stage.
EFTA00019662.pdf
This document is an email chain between the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (USANYS/SDNY) dated August 16-17, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The OIG is inquiring whether SDNY had specific requirements, separate from Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policies, to 'memorialize' (record or log) Epstein's phone calls related to his case, and if those requirements were followed. The USANYS recipient responds by asking for clarification on the definition of 'memorialize phone calls.'
DOJ-OGR-00017725.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a court cross-examination transcript dated August 10, 2022, involving a witness identified as 'Jane.' The questioning focuses on Jane's associations with individuals named Emmy, Michelle, and Kelly, and her claims regarding their involvement in 'sexual contact' and 'group massages.' It also touches upon Jane's prior interactions with government agents and prosecutors, including her ability to identify individuals from pictures and statements made during an initial meeting in September.
DOJ-OGR-00001383.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues on behalf of Ms. Maxwell against the Government's handling of her abuse allegations. The defense claims the Government's conclusion that the abuse was 'unfounded' is a 'self-serving proclamation' based on a Bureau of Prisons video review that neither the prosecutors, court, nor defense have seen. The document demands the video be produced for review and accuses the Government of hypocrisy and a desire to humiliate Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00000572.jpg
This document is page 62 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, appearing to be a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). A prosecutor argues against the defendant's request for home detention, describing it as a 'gilded cage' and 'private jail' that necessitates actual detention. The prosecutor also clarifies that the SDNY case was independently investigated by the FBI, CBP, and NYPD, explicitly stating there was no coordination with the Southern District of Florida regarding the initiation of this specific case.
DOJ-OGR-00002359(1).jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government failed to acknowledge that prosecutors had been approached multiple times by another party prior to a grand jury subpoena being issued. The document alleges that the government and an Assistant U.S. Attorney continued to omit mention of these prior contacts during court appearances in March and April 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00001811.jpg
This legal document is a letter from defense counsel Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 23, 2020, concerning Ghislaine Maxwell's case. The letter complains that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) are severely hindering Ms. Maxwell's ability to prepare her defense by preventing counsel from reviewing documents with her effectively during legal visits. The defense requests the Court to order the BOP to allow them to pass legal papers to Ms. Maxwell for review and suggests a status conference to address these ongoing issues.
DOJ-OGR-00022126.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court order filed on May 25, 2021, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. It outlines the U.S. Government's ongoing and affirmative obligations to disclose information to the defense, including procedures for handling sensitive information related to national security or witness safety. The order also specifies the range of sanctions the Court can impose for non-compliance, from granting a continuance to dismissing charges entirely.
DOJ-OGR-00021253.jpg
This document outlines the specific terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between the government and Jeffrey Epstein, requiring a guilty plea to state charges involving minors and a two-year prison sentence. It details the legal statutes violated (Florida statutes regarding lewd battery, solicitation, and sexual activity with minors) and stipulates that federal investigations would close upon his state sentencing. The document also includes a narrative section describing the contentious negotiation process between July and September 2007, noting the prosecution's frustration with defense tactics.
DOJ-OGR-00021177.jpg
This executive summary details an investigation by the Department of Justice's Office of Professional Responsibility into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in 2007-2008. It outlines the initial investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, Epstein's indictment, the referral to the FBI, and the subsequent negotiation and signing of a non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Epstein, which included conditions like pleading guilty to state charges and victim compensation. The OPR investigated whether prosecutors committed misconduct by failing to consult victims or misleading them.
DOJ-OGR-00019838.jpg
This document appears to be page 10 of a legal brief filed on April 1, 2021, arguing that Ghislaine Maxwell should be granted bail. The text criticizes the District Court for relying on the Government's 'conclusory allegations' regarding the strength of the case to justify detention. The defense argues the case is old, based on anonymous hearsay that has not been confronted, and that prosecutors have refused to disclose the accusers' names or specific allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00010668.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court filing (Document 674) from June 2022, containing a victim impact statement addressed to the court. The anonymous author, a 45-year-old survivor with 19 years of sobriety, details the long-term psychological effects of Ghislaine Maxwell's abuse, including panic attacks and dissociation. The author expresses gratitude to the judge, jury, and prosecutors following their testimony in the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00010607.jpg
This document is page 16 of a court filing (Document 672) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case, dated June 24, 2022. It is a Victim Impact Statement written by a 45-year-old woman who testified at the trial, detailing the long-term psychological effects of the abuse she suffered, including substance use disorder and PTSD. The author expresses gratitude to the court, the prosecutors, the jury, and Judge Nathan for the fair execution of the trial and the opportunity to seek justice.
DOJ-OGR-00010472.jpg
This legal document details the allegedly poor and dehumanizing conditions of Ms. Maxwell's pre-trial detention. It argues that inadequate nutrition, sleep deprivation, psychological threats, and significant technical difficulties with discovery materials severely weakened her and thwarted her ability to prepare her defense. The document suggests these conditions were intentionally imposed to satisfy various government and legal parties following Epstein's death.
DOJ-OGR-00004870.jpg
This document is page 58 of 80 from a legal filing (likely a brief or opinion) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. The text analyzes legal precedents, specifically *Government of Virgin Islands v. Scotland*, to argue that prosecutors must be held to their promises and assurances to defendants, particularly when a defendant relies on those promises to their detriment. The page discusses the concepts of specific performance, due process, and plea agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00020043.jpg
This legal document is a filing from Ms. Maxwell's defense team arguing that she was not trying to avoid arrest or hide from law enforcement. The defense claims they would have arranged a self-surrender if requested and that her actions during the arrest, such as moving to an interior room and wrapping a phone in foil, were pre-arranged security measures to protect herself from the press, not to evade officers. A new statement from the head of her security company is presented as evidence to support this claim.
DOJ-OGR-00005571.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is part of a court case where the Government is arguing for the protection of 'Minor Victims' by allowing them to testify under pseudonyms. The Government asserts that this protection is necessary to prevent their identities from being exposed by news outlets, which would cause significant harm, and that the Defendant's need for witness information does not outweigh this need for protection. The document cites the Second Circuit's definition of a defendant's interests in witness disclosure.
DOJ-OGR-00005396.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement from the Government, filed on October 29, 2021, in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government submits nine motions in limine to the Court, seeking to set the rules for an upcoming trial. The motions aim to protect victims' privacy, admit certain statements, and preclude the defense from introducing what the Government considers irrelevant, confusing, or improper evidence and arguments, such as questioning law enforcement decisions or attempting to garner sympathy for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00005314.jpg
This document is page 38 of 40 from a court filing (Document 365) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on October 22, 2021. It contains proposed voir dire questions (15-20) designed to screen potential jurors for bias regarding the government (DOJ, FBI, NYPD), the legal system, and wealthy individuals. The questions specifically ask if jurors have opinions on 'people who are wealthy or have luxurious lifestyles' that would affect their impartiality.
Victim Credibility
Information that alleged victims spoke of using alcohol and marijuana on a popular Web site.
Accuser Credibility
Shared information about accusers including MySpace posts regarding drugs and alcohol.
Interview
Interview between prosecutors and the witness Espinosa.
No Subject
Publicly released communications between prosecutors and defense counsel regarding the NPA.
Plea proposal
The original 'term sheet' proposed that Epstein plead guilty to three state offenses with a two-year incarceration recommendation.
The case
The witness (Espinosa) confirms having an interview with prosecutors via videoconference during the summer of the current year.
The case
The witness (Espinosa) confirms having an interview with prosecutors via videoconference during the summer of the current year.
Plea Agreement
Prosecutors entered into an agreement blocking prosecution without telling the victims.
Plea negotiations
Already thinking about the same statutes.
Unknown
Approached prosecutors multiple times
Maxwell's status
Contact regarding Maxwell, though location was not disclosed.
Allowing defense counsel to pass legal papers
The prosecutors agreed to call the MDC to ensure defense counsel could pass legal papers to Ms. Maxwell, though the message was reportedly not received by the MDC.
Allowing defense counsel to pass legal papers
The prosecutors agreed to call the MDC to ensure defense counsel could pass legal papers to Ms. Maxwell, though the message was reportedly not received by the MDC.
Discovery and Case Management
Weingarten mentions having 'good conversations' with the prosecutors.
Credibility of victims
Dershowitz met with prosecutors to undermine the credibility of the accusers based on their Myspace activity.
Arrest Warrants
Request to approve warrants to arrest Mr. Epstein
Defense Evidence
Presentation of printouts from victims' Myspace pages.
Epstein investigation
The document mentions that OPR's evaluation was aided by 'extensive, contemporaneous emails among the prosecutors' from the 2006-2008 period.
NPA Negotiation
Negotiations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its scope.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity