Florida Science Foundation
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Affiliation work release site |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Work release employment |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment affiliation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment former |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
President founder |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Office tenant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment alleged |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-11-01 | N/A | Incorporation of the Florida Science Foundation. | Florida | View |
| 2007-11-01 | N/A | Incorporation of Florida Science Foundation (according to Division of Corporations). | Florida | View |
Jeffrey Epstein Part 22 of 22.pdf
This document contains court filings from September 2009 regarding a dispute over the deposition of 'Jane Doe No. 4' in the civil case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's attorney, Adam Horowitz, cancelled the deposition after an alleged intimidation incident where Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, crossed paths with the plaintiff in the building lobby. Epstein's legal team (Critton and Luttier) filed for sanctions, arguing the encounter was coincidental as Epstein was leaving his office (Florida Science Foundation, same building) to avoid the deposition. The document includes affidavits from Epstein and Zinoviev denying interaction, invoices for the cancelled deposition costs, and a 2008 plea conference transcript defining 'no contact' orders.
014.pdf
This document is a plea agreement and sentencing order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County dated June 30, 2008. Jeffrey Epstein pleads guilty to Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, receiving a sentence of 18 months in county detention followed by 12 months of community control. The order specifies strict conditions including house arrest at 358 El Brillo Way, sex offender registration, electronic monitoring, and a work-release arrangement allowing him to work at the 'Florida Science Foundation' in West Palm Beach.
016-13.pdf
This document is a Motion for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 3 against Jeffrey Epstein on January 4, 2010. The motion alleges that Epstein flagrantly violated multiple court orders, including a No-Contact Order, by deliberately appearing at the location of the Plaintiff's Independent Medical Examination (IME) on November 24, 2009. The Plaintiff requests sanctions, attorney's fees, and a protective order moving the remainder of her IME to a different city, citing the trauma caused by the encounter.
016-12.pdf
This document is a Motion for Sanctions filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 4 against Jeffrey Epstein for violating a no-contact order and a written stipulation. On September 16, 2009, Epstein appeared in the lobby of the building where Jane Doe No. 4's deposition was scheduled, staring her down and causing her to flee in distress, despite an agreement that he would not attend. The document includes a declaration from attorney Adam Horowitz, a transcript of the cancelled deposition where defense counsel Robert Critton argues Epstein was simply leaving his office in the same building, and an email confirming the prior stipulation.
016-01.pdf
This document is a transcript of a plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein held in June 2008 in Palm Beach County Court. Epstein pleads guilty to state charges involving solicitation of prostitution and procuring a minor, agreeing to an 18-month jail sentence followed by community control (probation). The transcript details the specific conditions of his release, including residency at his Palm Beach home, work release at his own 'Florida Science Foundation' (located in the same building as his attorney), and strict prohibitions on contacting victims or minors.
008.pdf
This document contains a Motion for Protective Order filed by Igor Zinoview and Jeffrey Epstein to limit the scope of depositions in a civil case. Zinoview asserts via affidavit that he only began working for Epstein in November 2005, after the alleged events, and thus has no relevant knowledge. The filing also includes excerpts from the depositions of Epstein's pilots, Larry Visoski and Larry Eugene Morrison, where they are questioned about their personal beliefs regarding the sexual abuse allegations and whether they would trust Epstein with their own daughters. Flight logs and passenger manifests are referenced in the deposition indexes ('PLAINTIFF'S EX. 1 FLIGHT LOG BOOK' and 'JEGE, Inc., Passenger Manifest') but the actual log content is not present in these specific pages.
011-01.pdf
This document is a collection of court records from June 2008 regarding the sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida. It includes the Judgment and Sentence for charges of Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, sentencing him to 18 months of community control and county jail time with work release. The documents also detail strict community control conditions, including sex offender registration, electronic monitoring, and employment at the Florida Science Foundation, as well as an order sealing a Non-Prosecution Agreement.
EFTA00032238.pdf
This document is a transcript of the June 30, 2008, plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. During the proceedings, Epstein pleads guilty to state charges of soliciting prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. The transcript details the terms of the plea agreement, including an 18-month jail sentence, community control conditions, sex offender registration requirements, and the existence of a non-prosecution agreement with federal authorities.
EFTA00027591.pdf
This document is a transcript of the plea conference held on June 30, 2008, in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida, for the case of State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Epstein pleads guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution. The transcript details the terms of the plea agreement, which includes an 18-month jail sentence (12 months on one count, 6 consecutive on the other) followed by community control, sex offender registration, and a non-prosecution agreement with federal authorities.
EFTA00023059.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via NPA and failing to ensure victims were notified, he did not commit professional misconduct as defined by clear and unambiguous standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the CVRA litigation by victims, and the subsequent fallout leading to Acosta's resignation and Epstein's 2019 arrest and death.
EFTA00014139.pdf
An email thread from July 2008 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (Southern District of Florida) and Colonel Gauger (likely PBSO). The prosecutor raises serious concerns about Jeffrey Epstein's work release arrangement, noting that the 'Florida Science Foundation' Epstein claimed to work for was only recently incorporated and located inside his attorney Jack Goldberger's office suite. The AUSA argues that Epstein sitting in his lawyer's office 'web-surfing' and ordering food does not constitute proper imprisonment.
EFTA00014044.pdf
This document is an email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys dated November 20, 2008, reacting with surprise and anger to the news that Jeffrey Epstein was granted work release. The prosecutors discuss how Epstein's lawyers (Goldberger and Roy) had previously assured them this would not happen. The emails allege that the 'Florida Science Foundation' exists solely to employ Epstein, allowing him to spend his days at his lawyer's office rather than in confinement.
EFTA00013965.pdf
An email chain between Assistant U.S. Attorneys discussing the filing of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement. The correspondence highlights significant 'misstatements' made by Epstein during his change of plea, specifically regarding the 'Florida Science Foundation' (FSF). The emails reveal that the FSF was incorporated much later than Epstein claimed, operated out of Jack Goldberger's law office without signage or staff knowledge, and that Epstein could not have worked there daily as he claimed.
EFTA00013914.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated July 1, 2008, regarding the filing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement in the Epstein case. The prosecutor highlights that Epstein made 'misstatements' to the court regarding his employment at the 'Florida Science Foundation,' noting that the entity was only recently incorporated, operated out of attorney Jack Goldberger's office with no physical presence, and that Epstein had not been in the county to work there 'every day' as claimed. The prosecutor leaves it to the recipient's discretion whether to inform the Court of these lies.
EFTA00013359.pdf
This document is the Executive Summary of a DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report from November 2020 investigating the conduct of U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta and other prosecutors regarding the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein. OPR concluded that while Acosta exercised "poor judgment" in resolving the case via the NPA and failing to ensure victims were properly notified, he and his staff did not commit professional misconduct as defined by DOJ standards. The report details the history of the investigation, the secret negotiations, the subsequent violation of the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and the eventual fallout leading to Acosta's resignation as Labor Secretary in 2019.
EFTA00011475.pdf
This document is an Executive Summary of a November 2020 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility report investigating the 2006-2008 federal handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida. It details the negotiation of the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) approved by then-US Attorney Alexander Acosta, which allowed Epstein to plead to lesser state charges, and examines the failure of the government to consult with victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The report concludes that while Acosta and other attorneys did not commit professional misconduct by definition, Acosta exercised 'poor judgment' in resolving the case via the NPA and the government failed to treat victims with necessary forthrightness.
DOJ-OGR-00030305.tif
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding on September 17, 2009, detailing the cancellation of a deposition involving Jeffrey Epstein. The deposition was called off because Jeffrey Epstein made face-to-face contact with the plaintiff, Jane Doe 4, which her counsel, Adam Horowitz, stated intimidated her and violated a prior stipulation that Epstein would not be present. Defense counsel, Robert Critton, argued that Epstein was instructed to leave the building and planned to appear via Skype, and that the encounter would not have happened if the plaintiff and her counsel had arrived on time.
DOJ-OGR-00023153.tif
This document details events in November 2008 concerning Jeffrey Epstein's work release, which USAO official Villafaña believed breached his non-prosecution agreement (NPA). Villafaña communicated her concerns to defense attorney Black and other officials, leading to a notice of NPA violation and the recusal of Acosta from the case. The document highlights the ongoing dispute regarding the terms of Epstein's incarceration and the perceived special treatment he received.
DOJ-OGR-00002537.jpg
This document serves as a historical summary of legal proceedings regarding Jeffrey Epstein between 2008 and 2018. It details his controversial work release program via the 'Florida Science Foundation,' the eventual unsealing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the subsequent civil litigation under the CVRA. It also covers Alexander Acosta's 2017 confirmation as Labor Secretary and the 2018 Miami Herald investigation exposing the lenient plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00021316.jpg
This legal document details concerns from the U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO), voiced by an individual named Villafaña, regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release arrangement in Palm Beach County. Villafaña alleges that Epstein's lawyers schemed to make him eligible and that his application contained significant inaccuracies, such as listing a foundation with his lawyer's phone number as his employer. The document also notes a potential conflict of interest where Epstein paid thousands of dollars per week to off-duty sheriff's deputies for protection, seemingly in violation of work release rules.
DOJ-OGR-00021315.jpg
This document details internal DOJ conflicts in November 2008 regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release. Prosecutor Villafaña argued Epstein's 12-hour-a-day release to the 'Florida Science Foundation' breached his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) requiring 24-hour confinement, prompting her to ask superiors if she could indict him. Concurrently, USAO official Alex Acosta recused himself from the case due to employment discussions with Epstein's defense firm, Kirkland & Ellis.
DOJ-OGR-00021314.jpg
This document details the conflict between federal prosecutors (USAO) and local officials regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release. It reveals that Epstein and his lawyer, Jack Goldberger, misled the court about Epstein's employment at the 'Florida Science Foundation,' a shell entity created in November 2007 using Goldberger's office address, despite Epstein claiming in court it had existed for 15 years. The Palm Beach Sheriff's Office placed Epstein on work release in October 2008 without notifying the USAO, contradicting previous assurances.
DOJ-OGR-00003316.jpg
This document details the conflicting communications and actions surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's work release following his June 30, 2008 plea. It reveals that while federal prosecutors (USAO) and Epstein's own attorney indicated he would not get work release, a Palm Beach Sheriff's Office official stated he was eligible, and he was ultimately placed in the program without the USAO's knowledge. The document also highlights Epstein's false statements to the court about his employment at the non-existent "Florida Science Foundation."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013421.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis reprint of a June 25, 2009, Palm Beach Daily News article regarding an upcoming judicial ruling on whether to unseal Jeffrey Epstein's federal non-prosecution agreement. The article notes Epstein's imminent release date from the Palm Beach County Stockade (July 22, 2009) and details the legal battle between his attorney, Jack Goldberger, who wants the records sealed to protect third parties, and victims' attorney Brad Edwards, who seeks to use the documents in depositions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity