| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
11
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Adversarial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Prosecutors
|
Adversarial communication |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefcourt
|
Friend |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas E. Scott
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Rebecca Shabad
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Doe
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
President Clinton
|
Professional defense |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard A. Simpson
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mary E. Borja
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ashley E. Eiler
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicole Audet Richardson
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Thomas E. Scott
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard A. Simpson
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Edwards
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
KISS
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Self likely |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Correspondent |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts Giuffre
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley J. Edwards
|
Opposing parties |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Alleged meeting on Jeffrey Epstein's island involving Roberts, Dershowitz, the Gores, and Bill Cl... | Jeffrey Epstein's island | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia Roberts levels accusations; Dershowitz claims to have disproved them. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Florida Defamation Action | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of Jeffrey Epstein's secret non-prosecution deal with the federal government. | Florida | View |
| 2018-12-05 | N/A | Publication of Letter to the Editor in The Harvard Crimson. | Harvard/Cambridge | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-02-03 | N/A | Submission of legal document | Miami, Florida / Washington... | View |
| 2016-02-03 | N/A | Filing of the Redacted Motion to Modify Confidentiality Order. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-01-29 | N/A | Dershowitz filed Motion for Clarification of Confidentiality Order. | Court | View |
| 2016-01-16 | N/A | Deposition of Virginia Roberts Giuffre began. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-01-12 | N/A | Videotape Continued Deposition of Alan M. Dershowitz (Volume 3) | Tripp Scott, Fort Lauderdal... | View |
| 2015-11-23 | N/A | Filing of Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Motion to Determine Confidentiality | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-10-16 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Paul G. Cassell | Fort Lauderdale, Florida | View |
| 2015-03-24 | N/A | Motion entered on FLSD Docket. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-01-19 | N/A | Date of a Declaration referenced in Request no. 1. | Federal Court (implied) | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Filing of Complaint for Defamation against Alan Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2015-01-06 | N/A | Edwards and Cassell filed legal pleadings seeking intervention in CVRA action alleging Dershowitz... | Federal District Court, Sou... | View |
| 2010-06-28 | N/A | Document entered on FLSD Docket. | Florida Southern District C... | View |
| 2010-03-23 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Bradley J. Edwards | 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boule... | View |
This document is the cover page for the videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassell, taken on October 16, 2015, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The deposition is part of Case No. CACE 15-000072 in the Circuit Court of Broward County, involving plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against defendant Alan M. Dershowitz. The document indicates this is Volume I, covering pages 1 to 151, and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is a condensed transcript (Pages 1-4) of a videotaped deposition of Bradley J. Edwards, taken on March 23, 2010, in West Palm Beach, Florida. The case involves Jeffrey Epstein as the plaintiff against Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and L.M. Notable attendees included Jeffrey Epstein himself and his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram contacting attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California federal court. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwards it to his legal team (Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger). Portions of the attorney communications are redacted as privileged.
This document is an email chain dated April 28, 2016, originating from a Reuters journalist, David Ingram, seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleges that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email chain shows the inquiry being forwarded from Weinberg to Epstein (at jeevacation@gmail.com), and subsequently discussed by attorneys Jack Goldberger, Alan Dershowitz, and Roy Black, though the specific legal advice is redacted as privileged.
This document, part of a 2017 House Oversight filing, recounts the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how police sought serious molestation charges, but State Attorney Barry Krischer presented lesser charges to a grand jury, leading to accusations of preferential treatment. The text also highlights Epstein's high-profile connections, including Bill Clinton and Alan Dershowitz, and financial ties to Harvard and politicians like Eliot Spitzer and Bill Richardson.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters reporter David Ingram seeking comment from attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v. Trump) alleging rape by Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who then forwarded it to his legal defense team, including Alan Dershowitz and Roy Black. The document includes a 'Privileged - Redacted' stamp, indicating sensitive attorney-client communication was removed.
This document is page 22 of a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, in the case involving Alan Dershowitz. It details the Defendant's objections to Requests for Production #12 and #13, which seek evidence regarding claims that Jane Doe #3 lied about world leaders and that a Palm Beach County State Attorney dropped a case due to her lack of credibility. Dershowitz's defense emphasizes that his original declaration stated these claims were made 'on information and belief' and agrees to produce non-privileged documents in his possession.
A legal motion filed on March 24, 2015, in Broward County Circuit Court by plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs seek to compel Dershowitz to produce documents he claims to possess that prove he did not sexually abuse 'Jane Doe No. 3,' noting that he has refused a discovery request for over 45 days. The document is marked with a House Oversight stamp.
This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the Southern District of Florida. They are responding to Alan Dershowitz's supplement for intervention, arguing that he has failed to provide specific evidence refuting Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite his public claims on Fox Business to the contrary.
This is page 16 of a rough draft deposition transcript involving a witness named Cassell and an attorney named Mr. Simpson. The attorney introduces two exhibits into the record: Exhibit 1, which is a Plaintiff's Response to a Motion for Limited Intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz, and Exhibit 2, a motion for joinder by Jane Doe Number 3 and Jane Doe Number 4. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is Page 2 of a rough draft transcript for the videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassell, taken on October 16, 2015, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The deposition relates to the lawsuit 'Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz.' The transcript lists the legal appearances, including counsel for the plaintiffs, counsel for defendant Alan Dershowitz, and counsel for Virginia Roberts (Sigrid McCawley).
This document is the cover page for a 'Rough Draft Transcript' of a deposition for the case 'Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs. Alan M. Dershowitz'. The deposition of witness Paul G. Cassell took place on October 16, 2015. The document includes standard legal disclaimers regarding the raw nature of the transcript, defining potential errors such as conflicts, untranslates, and reporter's notes.
This document, likely a news article excerpt found in House Oversight files, details the early stages of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein starting in March 2005. It highlights the conflict between the Palm Beach Police, who sought arrest warrants based on victim testimony (including recruiter Haley Robson), and State Attorney Barry Krischer, who delayed proceedings. The text describes specific allegations of sexual acts with a 14-year-old and mentions Epstein's legal team (Lefcourt and Dershowitz) actively working to discredit accusers using MySpace data.
This document is a chain of forwarded emails initiated by Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) in 2008 and eventually forwarded by Jeffrey Epstein to his legal team in 2010. The content includes an editorial from the Palm Beach Post titled "He was over 50. And they were girls," which criticizes the leniency of charges against Epstein regarding minors. The email chain tracks the dissemination of this article among Epstein's defense attorneys, including Alan Dershowitz, Robert Critton, and Martin Weinberg.
This document is an email chain originating from a 2008 email by Michael Reiter to a contact named Margie, discussing leaks regarding the Epstein plea deal and criticizing the Palm Beach Daily News for their editorial silence. The email contains the text of a critical 2008 Palm Beach Post editorial regarding Epstein's sentence and mansion. In 2010, Jeffrey Epstein forwarded this historic email chain to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Martin Weinberg, and Robert Critton Jr.
This document details the legal proceedings and lifestyle of Jeffrey Epstein, contrasting his opulent life on his private island with his status as a sex offender facing prosecution. It covers the timeline of allegations starting in 2005 involving a minor, the involvement of high-profile defense lawyers like Kenneth Starr and Alan Dershowitz, and the eventual involvement of the U.S. Attorney's office in Miami.
This document, likely a page from a news article filed in House Oversight records, summarizes the conflict between Palm Beach police and the State Attorney regarding the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein. It details how Police Chief Reiter accused State Attorney Krischer of preferential treatment for Epstein. The text outlines Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Harvard), his legal defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz, and provides specific graphic details of the allegations made by a 14-year-old victim who was recruited by Haley Robson.
This document appears to be a news article or report summary detailing the 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It highlights the conflict between the police (who sought serious molestation charges) and the State Attorney (who pursued lesser solicitation charges), allegations of preferential treatment due to Epstein's wealth and connections, and the political fallout involving returned donations. It also outlines Epstein's defense strategy led by Gerald Lefcourt and Alan Dershowitz.
This document is an email chain initiated by Jeffrey Epstein in 2010, forwarding a 2008 email from Michael Reiter (Palm Beach Police) to a journalist named Margie. Reiter discusses leaking information about Epstein's plea deal to her and expresses frustration that her paper (Palm Beach Daily News) remained silent editorially. The email includes the full text of a critical Palm Beach Post editorial from July 2008, highlighting the 'different system of justice for the wealthy' and detailing Epstein's legal team.
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It certifies that attorneys Thomas E. Scott and Steven R. Safra of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. served legal documents on behalf of their client, Alan M. Dershowitz, to plaintiff's counsel Jack Scarola via E-Serve on February 23, 2015. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
This document is the signature page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) entered on March 24, 2015. It lists the legal counsel representing Alan M. Dershowitz, including attorneys from Wiley Rein LLP, Sweder & Ross, LLP, and Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. The text confirms the defendant's agreement to produce responsive, non-privileged documents.
This document is page 23 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) containing the Defendant's responses to specific document requests. The requests specifically seek evidence regarding allegations that Jane Doe #3 had sex with President Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein's Little Saint James Island. The Defendant agrees to produce non-privileged documents regarding the Clinton allegations but objects to producing copies of their passports.
This document is page 21 of a legal response entered on March 24, 2015, in the Florida Southern District Court. The Defendant (referencing Alan Dershowitz) agrees to produce documents supporting the claim that 'Jane Doe #3 is a serial liar.' However, regarding the request for documents proving President Clinton never visited Little Saint James, the Defendant objects, clarifying that his declaration relied on information regarding Secret Service records, and states he personally has no responsive documents to produce on that matter.
This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida, containing a Defendant's responses to discovery requests regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The requests seek documents proving the presence of the Defendant's nephew and Epstein's legal team on Epstein's private plane, as well as flight manifests linking the Defendant to Epstein. The Defendant objects to requests regarding the legal team by citing allegations from 'Jane Doe #3' regarding her abuse between 1999 and 2002, arguing that post-2002 travel records are irrelevant to the specific action.
This document is a page from a legal discovery response filed in the Southern District of Florida in 2015. The Defendant (likely Alan Dershowitz) agrees to produce documents regarding the presence of his wife and daughter on Little Saint James Island, at Epstein's New Mexico ranch, and on Epstein's private plane. Notably, the Defendant explicitly confirms there was a 'sole occasion' where he was physically present at the New Mexico ranch.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-03-24 | Paid | Alan M. Dershowitz | Plaintiffs (Edwar... | $0.00 | Request for court to order payment of reasonabl... | View |
Claims to have collected documents providing proof he did not abuse Jane Doe No. 3.
Friend told Dershowitz that Roberts felt pressured to go after him for money from Wexner.
Transcript AD-006931-006933 (Exhibit H).
Letter pointing to evidence refuting Roberts' claims.
Pointing to evidence that Roberts fabricated accusations.
Epstein steered the conversation toward human genetic improvement.
Friend told Dershowitz that Roberts felt pressured to go after him for money from Wexner.
Dershowitz defends himself against Roberts' allegations, claiming she is lying and was pressured to frame him.
Rebuttal of accusations and criticism of journalism.
Dershowitz defends himself against Roberts' allegations, claiming she is lying and was pressured to frame him.
Letter disputing coverage of allegations and claiming innocence based on records.
Interview where Dershowitz claims his central point was omitted.
Valid discovery request sent more than 45 days prior to this motion.
Accusations of deliberate misconduct and unethical behavior warranting disbarment against Edwards and Cassell.
Forwarding the chain to Dershowitz.
[Content Redacted/Privileged]
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity