PIF
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
SABIC
|
Ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Saudi Telecom
|
Ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ministry of Finance (Saudi Arabia)
|
Subsidiary department |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
NCB
|
Ownership |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Council of Ministers
|
Supervisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Saudi Ministry of Finance
|
Representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Saudi Ministry of Finance
|
Organizational hierarchy |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
|
Potential political subdivision |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deputy Crown Prince
|
Oversight |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Authorization of limited jurisdictional discovery regarding PIF | Federal Court (USA) | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | PIF announced $3.5bn stake in Uber. | Global | View |
| 2014-01-01 | N/A | Cabinet authorized PIF to establish companies inside and outside Saudi Arabia. | Saudi Arabia | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020602.jpg
This document is an appendix page (Appendix 1, page 143) from a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020602). It serves as a glossary or acronym list defining various Chinese government, political, military, and media organizations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017857.jpg
This document is page 792 of a Federal Supplement legal opinion (likely In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, based on context and case citations). It discusses a motion by the National Commercial Bank (NCB) to dismiss a case based on the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court denies the motion without prejudice, ordering 'limited jurisdictional discovery' to determine if the Public Investment Fund (PIF) qualifies as a political subdivision of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. The document also references exceptions to sovereign immunity, including 'state sponsor of terrorism' and 'commercial activities.' The footer indicates this document was part of a House Oversight Committee production. There is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017856.jpg
This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (349 F.Supp.2d 765) regarding the 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It discusses legal tests for sovereign immunity under the FSIA, specifically analyzing whether entities like the KDIC (Korea) and PIF (Saudi Public Investment Fund) qualify as organs of a foreign state or political subdivisions. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' bates stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into foreign financial ties or the 9/11 litigation itself, though no specific mention of Jeffrey Epstein appears on this page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Federal Supplement) included in a House Oversight Committee production (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017855). It analyzes the legal status of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically referencing the 'Dole Food' Supreme Court standard for direct ownership. The text argues that for the National Commercial Bank (NCB) to enjoy immunity, the PIF (its owner) must be proven to be an organ or instrumentality of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, citing affidavits from the Saudi Ministry of Finance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017854.jpg
This page is from a 2005 court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) regarding the immunity of Saudi officials and entities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The court rules that Prince Sultan and Prince Turki are immune from suit for official acts. It also discusses the National Commercial Bank's (NCB) claim to immunity as a government instrumentality of Saudi Arabia, analyzing share ownership by the Public Investment Fund (PIF) and transactions involving the bin Mahfouz family.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017852.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) detailing allegations against the National Commercial Bank (NCB) and its leadership, specifically Khalid bin Mahfouz. It discusses claims that NCB and the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) facilitated financial support for al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden through charities and direct funding. The text references various legal complaints (Ashton, Burnett) and begins a discussion on the defendants' status under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023655.jpg
This document appears to be a transcript of an interview with a high-ranking Saudi royal (referred to as 'Your Highness,' likely Mohammed bin Salman) discussing economic reforms under Vision 2030. Topics include the stimulation of the private sector through government spending and the Public Investment Fund (PIF), the sale of Aramco, the refusal to impose income taxes, and the streamlining of foreign investment procedures, specifically mentioning a diplomatic intervention regarding German business licenses. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013917.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a resource guide or appendix listing various internet services, including web hosting (BlueHost, RackSpace), photography sources (iStockphoto, Getty Images), email marketing tools (AWeber, MailChimp), and ecommerce solutions (Shopify, Yahoo! Store). It contains a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013917', indicating it is part of a larger collection of documents reviewed by the House Oversight Committee. The text is written in an instructional tone, likely recommending tools for setting up a business or website.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013914.jpg
This document, stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013914', appears to be a page of 'Tools and Tricks' for web development and marketing, likely authored by Timothy Ferriss (evidenced by references to his website and blog). It lists resources such as The PX Method, Weebly, WordPress, and Wufoo, providing anecdotal advice on how to use them for quick website creation and testing business ideas. The document discusses setting up a fundraiser in Slovakia that outperformed a Stephen Colbert initiative.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029108.jpg
An email chain between Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein from October 2017. Summers advises Epstein that a public link to Paul Manafort would be a 'disaster' and a 'shit show.' Later in the month, Summers confirms to Epstein he is flying back from a trip (implied to be Saudi Arabia) where he met with Softbank and PIF representatives, playfully asking Epstein about life among the 'lucrative and louche.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025134.jpg
An email thread between Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein from October 2017. They discuss Donald Trump ('DjT'), political risks involving Paul Manafort, and Summers' meetings with Softbank and Saudi PIF representatives. Summers also shares a controversial comparison regarding Harvard admissions versus workplace sexual misconduct allegations, explicitly asking Epstein not to repeat the insight.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025129.jpg
An email chain from October 2017 between Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeffrey E.'). Summers discusses meeting with Softbank and Saudi PIF representatives, while Epstein asks about 'saudi?' and promises 'wild' stories from D.C. Earlier in the chain, Summers warns Epstein about a mutual associate (referred to as 'Your pal') getting negative press coverage regarding connections to Paul Manafort, calling the situation a 'staggering shit show'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025124.jpg
An email exchange between Larry Summers and Jeffrey Epstein from October 2017. Summers discusses a meeting involving Softbank and Saudi interests (PIF), criticizes Steven Mnuchin and Donald Trump, and shares a highly controversial 'insight' comparing the morality of Harvard admissions regarding infanticide versus sexual harassment allegations in the workplace, explicitly asking Epstein not to repeat it. Epstein responds teasing 'wild' stories from D.C. regarding their next meeting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029459.tif
This document from Bank of America Merrill Lynch's Global Equities division provides an analysis of the Saudi market, anticipating positive outcomes from EM index reviews in March and June. It highlights strong Saudi fundamentals, including a bottomed-out growth and fiscal adjustment, and outlines a positive equity strategy. The report also details key events such as Crown Prince MBS's US tour and meeting with Trump, and recommends 10 single stock names to own in Saudi, including Al Rajhi, NCB, SABIC, Yansab, and STC.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016135.jpg
This document is page 25 of a Bank of America Merrill Lynch research report ('GEMs Paper #26') dated June 30, 2016, analyzing Saudi Arabia's fiscal policy and the Public Investment Fund (PIF). It includes a detailed table of PIF domestic assets, calculating the potential monetary value of selling government stakes in major Saudi companies like SABIC and Saudi Telecom to replenish fiscal reserves. The text discusses the necessity of fiscal consolidation, the impact of oil prices, and predicted economic measures such as the implementation of VAT in 2018. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was produced as evidence in a congressional investigation, likely related to Jeffrey Epstein's financial connections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016119.jpg
This document is a financial table titled 'Table 3: Breakdown of Saudi Arabia Net International Investment Position (US$bn)' from a Merrill Lynch report dated June 30, 2016. It details Saudi Arabia's assets and liabilities from 2007 to 2015, including holdings in US Treasuries, equities, and deposits in BIS reporting banks. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016119', indicating it was part of a document production for the US House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016118.jpg
This document is a page from a Merrill Lynch financial research report dated June 30, 2016, labeled as evidence in a House Oversight Committee investigation. It analyzes the Saudi Public Investment Fund's (PIF) shift from a domestic to a global investor, detailing specific assets and investments such as a $3.5bn stake in Uber. It also discusses the potential economic impact of the JASTA bill ('9/11 bill'), noting Saudi threats to liquidate $750bn in US assets, while predicting that the bill will not significantly hinder Saudi investment in the US due to procedural hurdles and White House opposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016117.jpg
This document is a page from a Merrill Lynch financial research report (GEMs Paper #26) dated June 30, 2016. It analyzes the restructuring of Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), citing Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman's plans to transfer Saudi Aramco ownership to the fund to diversify foreign assets and reduce oil dependence. The report compares Saudi Arabia's sovereign wealth strategy to models in Abu Dhabi, Kuwait, and Norway.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016115.jpg
This document is page 5 of a Merrill Lynch research report (GEMs Paper #26) dated June 30, 2016, detailing the governance model of Saudi Vision 2030. It outlines the centralization of power under the Council of Economic and Development Affairs (CEDA), chaired by then-Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, and describes major strategic programs including the restructuring of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) into a $2 trillion sovereign wealth fund and the transformation of Saudi Aramco. The page contains a governance hierarchy diagram and a table listing various strategic programs and their status.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016114.jpg
This document is page 4 of a Merrill Lynch research report (GEMs Paper #26) dated June 30, 2016, discussing the economic and governmental restructuring in Saudi Arabia under 'Vision 2030.' It details the renaming and merging of various ministries, the appointment of a new Central Bank (SAMA) governor, and the strategic shifting of funds like the SFD and PIF. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of an investigation, likely regarding financial ties or foreign influence, though no specific connection to Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned in the text of this specific page.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity