| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, with the subject '302s New York', likely referring to FBI FD-302 interview reports. It was sent by a Special Agent from the FBI New York VCAC (Violent Crimes Against Children)/Human Trafficking unit. The sender's name and recipients are redacted.
This document contains an email thread between Roberta Kaplan's law firm (Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP) and an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence, dated January and February 2020, concerns a 'Touhy letter' request for documents from the Department of Justice related to pending litigation (*Doe v. Indyke et al.*) against Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The emails discuss scheduling a time to talk and reviewing the attached letters.
This document is a compilation of 'SDNY News Clips' from March 9, 2020, summarizing major legal news relevant to the Southern District of New York. Key stories include Prince Andrew's refusal to cooperate in the Epstein investigation, the transfer of the MCC jail captain following Epstein's suicide, a massive horse racing doping indictment involving high-profile trainers, the hung jury in the Joshua Schulte CIA leak trial, and internal DOJ conflicts between U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman and Attorney General William Barr. It also touches on Harvey Weinstein's injury in jail and new court restrictions due to the emerging Coronavirus outbreak. No flight logs were present in the document.
An Assistant U.S. Attorney emails colleagues to report rumors that Epstein is falsely claiming cooperation in the Bernie Madoff case to secure a reduced sentence from the State Attorney's Office. The email also flags a suspicious court docket change removing 'Special Conditions' from Epstein's sentence and discusses the potential to investigate new allegations involving New York victims, noting interest from Madoff prosecutors in using evidence against Epstein.
This is a heavily redacted email from June 18, 2008, with the subject 'Epstein'. The sender informs the recipients that they attempted to call Roy Black but left a message. Crucially, the email notes that an immunity request has been approved for 'one of the New York victims/recruiters' and discusses the logistics of sending this documentation.
This document is a letter from Kenneth Starr to a high-ranking DOJ official arguing against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. Starr alleges significant prosecutorial misconduct, including violations of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), leaks to the New York Times, and conflicts of interest within the US Attorney's Office. He claims the prosecution is politically motivated by Epstein's ties to Bill Clinton and requests a 'de novo' independent review of the case.
This document is a legal submission by Kirkland & Ellis LLP to the Deputy Attorney General arguing against federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in circa 2008. The defense argues that Epstein's conduct amounts to state-level solicitation of prostitution rather than federal sex trafficking or sex tourism, citing recent Supreme Court decisions to advocate for a narrow interpretation of federal statutes. The text asserts that Epstein did not target minors, did not use interstate commerce to lure victims, and that any underage women lied about their age.
This document is a forwarded email chain dated November 29, 2007, originating from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of Florida. The email shares a link to an article on AboveTheLaw.com regarding a civil suit filed in New York against Jeffrey Epstein, specifically referencing Maximilia Cordero in the URL. The email was forwarded with a brief 'Fyi' from a BlackBerry device.
This document is an email chain from October 19, 2007, discussing legal strategy surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents discuss a lawsuit filed in New York that has reached national news (Fox and ABC), expressing belief that this lawsuit is delaying Epstein's change of plea. The emails reveal that 'Epstein's camp' allegedly planted false stories to discredit victims and are attempting to resolve the civil lawsuit before the guilty plea to avoid it being used against him. The chain also references communicating with a 'Jay' regarding a proposed letter and asking Judge Davis about the Special Master's selection.
An email from Alan Dershowitz to a redacted recipient dated March 27, 2009. Dershowitz discusses his recent travels to Miami, NY, and Georgetown, and specifically asks the recipient to delay a planned call to the sheriff regarding their office's position on Jeffrey Epstein's sentencing and treatment.
This document contains an email chain between the FBI (NYO and CID) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS/SDNY) from May 7-8, 2020. The most critical email outlines the status of the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. It states that SDNY is close to a final decision on charging her for complicity in Epstein's sex trafficking. The FBI confirms they believe she is living in Manchester by the Sea, MA, tracked via pen registers, cell site data, and Amazon delivery subpoenas. Traditional surveillance (pole cameras) was deemed unsuitable due to the secluded location, leading to requests for renewed digital tracking and mail covers.
This document is an email chain from February to May 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a forensic/technical team regarding the processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the US Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical difficulties, including the inability to link emails to attachments (using 'flight records' as an example), mismatched load files, and a 'disaster' in tracking over 1 million documents. The technical team notes delays due to COVID-19 work reductions and a major network replacement that required the deletion of 400 TB of old data.
This document is a crucial email chain dated May 7, 2020, between the FBI and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). It reveals that authorities had tracked Ghislaine Maxwell to a secluded property in Manchester-by-the-Sea, Massachusetts, months before her July 2020 arrest. The emails confirm SDNY was close to a charging decision for sex trafficking and details the investigative methods used to locate her, including historical pen registers, cell site location data, and subpoenas to Amazon for delivery addresses, as traditional surveillance was deemed difficult due to the location's seclusion.
This document is an internal 'Case-Related Urgent' report dated May 20, 2021, detailing the USAO-SDNY's decision to offer deferred prosecution agreements to correctional officers Tova Noel and Michael Thomas. The officers were previously indicted for falsifying records on the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide in August 2019. The agreement requires them to admit guilt, perform community service, and cooperate with the Office of Inspector General's investigation into the institutional failures at the MCC.
This document is an email chain from August to October 2020 between attorneys Gloria Allred and Mariann Wang and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The attorneys are coordinating interviews for several new victims (referred to by initials AR, DM, JRC, and EH) willing to speak to the FBI regarding incidents involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell ranging from 2000 to 2017. Notably, one client (AR) alleges an interaction with Prince Andrew at Epstein's townhouse in approximately 2010.
This document is an email chain between SDNY prosecutors and FBI support staff (DocLab) regarding the digitization of physical evidence files for the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The correspondence spans from June 2019 to October 2020, covering the shipment of approximately 23 boxes of evidence (Case files 72-MM-113327 and 31E-MM-108062) for scanning. Key details include the refusal to scan 'pornographic images of young girls' due to FBI protocols, the retrieval of missing evidence items ('1As') from digital backups, and a 2020 follow-up ensuring all materials were correctly processed for discovery in the Ghislaine Maxwell case.
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated October 10, 2020. The sender informs a recipient that during document review, they found an attachment appearing to be a portion of 'long lost passenger manifests' related to 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein). The attachment is titled '2006-08-15_JEGE_MANIFEST_&_HYPERION_MANIFEST.pdf'.
A letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser) to the US Government prosecutors complaining about the government's failure to provide readable discovery materials at the MDC. The letter highlights that the government holds approximately 40,000 non-nude and thousands of nude/partially nude images seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The defense requests a fully readable laptop for Maxwell and immediate access to the seized images, noting that COVID-19 restrictions complicate the review process.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 regarding legal proceedings involving Ghislaine Maxwell. A sender (redacted) forwards a communication from the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP to another party (redacted), discussing letters received from 'Maxwell's counsel' concerning discovery and prison conditions. The sender proposes a meeting to discuss a draft response expected to be ready by the following Monday.
This document is an internal DOJ Office of the Inspector General (OIG) email thread from September 25, 2019, regarding a digital forensic report on two computers retrieved from the Special Housing Unit (SHU). A sender expresses disappointment ('underwhelmed') with the report and suggests obtaining copies of documents that a person named 'Thomas' (likely a guard) opened at the start of his shift. The email includes the signature block for the DOJ OIG New York Field Office.
This document is an email chain from September 27, 2019, originating from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email forwards a document titled 'MCC_Pros_Memo_v10.doc' (likely 'MCC Prosecution Memo') for review. Given the date and context (SDNY/MCC), this likely relates to the legal proceedings or investigation following Jeffrey Epstein's death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in August 2019.
This document is an email summary of an attorney proffer dated March 1, 2021, involving attorneys Mariann Wang and Gloria Allred and an AUSA. It details new information provided by their client regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein between December 2018 and July 2019, contradicting the idea that contact ceased in 2017. The summary alleges Epstein lured the client to various locations (Paris, Florida, NY, VI) under the guise of employment or medical help (dental), manipulated the client into feeling indebted, sexually abused the client in Florida and the Virgin Islands, and tasked the client with recruiting or vetting young women, including a specific instance in Russia.
Email correspondence from August 25, 2020, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). The SDNY Public Corruption Unit chief contacts the SDFL Managing AUSA to arrange access to stored evidence boxes concerning the prior investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirators, specifically to aid in the active prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell. The SDFL confirms the materials are in a secure room in West Palm Beach and discusses logistics for scanning them, referencing a previous OPR inquiry that accessed the same files.
This document is a Protective Order designated as Exhibit A, filed on March 18, 2016, in the case of Plaintiff (Redacted) v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS) in the Southern District of New York. The order, signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on March 17, 2016, establishes protocols for handling confidential discovery materials, defining who may access such information and how it must be designated, sealed, and eventually destroyed or returned. It specifically notes that confidential information implicates the privacy interests of both the plaintiff and Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an email chain from October 2020 involving the legal defense team of Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Mark Cohen, Laura Menninger, etc.). The email circulates a PDF attachment titled 'Letter to Government re Rule 16 and Brady Requests,' indicating legal maneuvering regarding evidence disclosure and discovery requests in a federal case.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity