| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Origin |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Maria
|
Resident |
1
|
1 |
This document is an email thread dated October 13, 2020, forwarding a daily press clipping report from the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The report lists various news articles, highlighting a section specifically for 'MAXWELL' which includes links to stories about Ghislaine Maxwell's legal case, photos, and Jeffrey Epstein's financial activities and associations (including Leon Black). The email sender flags these articles for the recipient's interest.
An email dated October 7, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) to FBI agents regarding 'Palm Beach.' The email attaches a subpoena to the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) and reports concerning activities from 2001-2004. It provides contact information for a Sergeant and discusses travel logistics for agents flying out the next morning.
This document is an FBI/NYS Division of Criminal Justice Services response to a criminal history inquiry (III search) originating from Florida, dated October 6, 2021. It serves as a 'rap sheet' or criminal history record for a subject whose identity is redacted. The document indicates that no fingerprint or DNA details were transmitted and contains extensive redactions covering the identification and criminal history sections.
This document is an email thread from September 2008 between Jeffery Edwards (an alias for Jeffrey Epstein) and an unidentified female recipient. The conversation takes place while Edwards is incarcerated (referred to as 'confinement' and 'vacation'). The recipient, currently in New York, conveys well-wishes and a crude joke from a mutual male acquaintance, while Edwards requests photos to be sent to him.
An email thread from September 2008 between Jeffery Edwards (using the email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and a redacted individual. The conversation discusses the email user's 'confinement' (likely Jeffrey Epstein's incarceration, potentially using Edwards' name or account) and includes requests for photos, jokes about contraband/Vaseline, and an offer for a visit. The correspondent mentions being in New York with another redacted individual.
This document is an email chain between the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the law firm Crowell & Moring regarding the scheduling and preparation for a proffer interview of a client (Mr. [Redacted]). The investigation focuses on the client's knowledge of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) employees in the Virgin Islands who may have assisted Jeffrey Epstein in avoiding standard entry processing or received favors from him, such as trips to his island. The emails arrange a WebEx meeting for November 12, 2020, to discuss these topics and specific interactions with a CBP employee who had the client's contact information.
This document is a printout of an internal FBI email sent on January 26, 2021, regarding 'CA photos' (likely California photos). A Special Agent from the Child Exploitation/Human Trafficking unit in the New York Field Office sent four photo attachments to another FBI agent. The document bears the Bates number EFTA00014980.
This document is a printed email chain from October 13, 2020, between FBI personnel (indicated by the header '(NY) (FBI)'). The subject is 'CART Review,' referring to the Computer Analysis Response Team. The correspondence discusses a phone conversation regarding 'CART stuff' involving a third redacted individual and requests a follow-up call. The document was printed on November 26, 2021, and bears the ID EFTA00014979.
This document is a printed email notification dated April 9, 2021, indicating that an FBI employee (names redacted) accepted a calendar invitation for a meeting titled 'GM Physical Evidence Review'. The header indicates the email originated from the New York FBI office outlook system. 'GM' likely refers to Ghislaine Maxwell in the context of these evidence files.
This document is an internal FBI email chain from October 2020 regarding the forensic review of 'Epstein HDs' (Hard Drives). The communications coordinate the transfer of 2TB external hard drives and digital evidence exports between the FBI's NY CART team and the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The emails highlight pressure from Executive Management ('EM') to avoid delays and mention that one agent involved in the case is OCONUS (Outside Continental US).
An email thread from July 2021 between FBI agents (New York Office) and NYPD personnel regarding the review of video evidence using a system called DCAP. The team reviewed 3,662 videos filtered for motion, tagging individuals as either 'file of interest' or 'reviewed'. Technical issues with the portal crashing were noted.
This document is a printout of an Outlook email or calendar notification from the mailbox of FBI agent Kimberly R. Meder. The notification, dated April 9, 2021, indicates an acceptance of a meeting or task titled 'GM Physical Evidence Review,' likely pertaining to the review of evidence in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The sender and recipient fields are redacted.
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
This document contains an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell's defense attorney, Laura Menninger, and US Prosecutors regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, which limits press statements. Menninger initially flags comments made by attorney Spencer Kuvin in 'The Sun' as a potential violation. The prosecution responds that Kuvin does not represent any trial witnesses, but counters that Maxwell's own appellate attorney, David Markus, may have violated the rule via statements to the 'NY Post'.
This document is an email dated May 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the case 'US v. Maxwell'. The email shares a draft joint letter seeking an extension for a pretrial schedule deadline, following a discussion held the previous day.
This document is a chain of emails from July 2019 between the FBI (New York field office) and the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the Epstein investigation. The correspondence coordinates the transfer of subpoena returns (specifically from American Express and Deutsche Bank) burned onto discs by a contractor named Hamilton. The team also schedules a conference call to discuss a 'game plan' and introduces a forensic accountant to the investigative squad.
An email dated July 24, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding a 'protective order' for discovery. The email references an attachment with the filename containing 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'RMB' (likely Judge Richard M. Berman), indicating legal proceedings related to the Epstein case.
This document is an email sent on July 16, 2019, by an FBI agent in the New York field office to multiple redacted recipients. The subject is 'news article' and the body contains only a hyperlink to a CBS News article regarding a Jeffrey Epstein accuser speaking via livestream.
An email from a redacted sender (likely a pilates/dance trainer) to Ghislaine Maxwell dated February 7, 2004. The sender expresses interest in continuing to train 'Jeffery' (Epstein) and explicitly discusses his preference for 'beautiful, talented young women.' The sender proposes a financial arrangement to actively scout and recruit 'suitable girls' from dance classes, asking for this to potentially become their main source of income.
An email chain originating from Christian Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP on October 1, 2020, forwarding a 'Letter to Government re Discovery' to redacted recipients. A subsequent email on October 2, 2020, asks the recipients if they have time to discuss the attached letter. The document relates to legal proceedings, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell case given Everdell's involvement, specifically regarding discovery issues with the government.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an attorney representing victims (Jane Doe 1 and 2) and likely prosecutors or investigators. The discussion centers on the legal argument that the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not extend to New York, a key point in the prosecution of Epstein. The attorney updates the recipients on recent filings in the Florida CVRA case, specifically mentioning motions by Epstein's lawyer, Marty Weinberg, and coordinates a phone call to discuss Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) expertise.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 discussing legal proceedings related to the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and Jeffrey Epstein's Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). An attorney representing victims 'Jane Doe 1 and 2' updates other parties (likely government officials or other counsel) on recent filings, arguing that the NPA does not extend to New York and is limited to Florida crimes. The thread also notes a recent motion by Epstein's lawyer, Marty Weinberg, regarding the scope of the NPA.
An email thread from July 2019 between a lawyer representing Jane Doe 1 and 2 (likely Paul Cassell based on Utah Bar mention) and an investigator/official. The lawyer updates the recipient on recent filings in the Florida CVRA case, specifically arguing that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) is limited to Florida and does not extend to New York, a point relevant to ongoing investigations. The recipient requests a call to discuss the lawyer's expertise on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA).
This document is an internal email thread from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated June 27, 2019. The correspondence discusses the acquisition of a victim list associated with the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) side-letter. The officials confirm that there are 32 names on the list, that they appear to be exclusively from Florida, and that the 'principal NY victim' is not included.
An email from the SDNY Public Corruption Unit dated June 27, 2019, discussing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Jeffrey Epstein. The sender confirms they reviewed the victim list in the NPA's side-letter and notes that their 'principal NY victim' is not listed, observing that the victims listed appear to be exclusively from Florida.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity