Grand Jury
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | The witness was scheduled to testify, and did testify, before a Grand Jury. | Unspecified courthouse | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Mr. Epstein was indicted by a grand jury on one felony count of solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-07-23 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein indicted by a Florida grand jury. | Florida | View |
| 2006-07-19 | N/A | Scheduled date for Grand Jury to convene to hear the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein was indicted on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | A grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on one felony count of solicitation of prostitution. | N/A | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | A grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on one felony count of solicitation of prostitution. This w... | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | A grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on the lesser count of soliciting prostitution, after the s... | Palm Beach County, Florida | View |
| 2006-07-01 | N/A | A grand jury indicted Jeffrey Epstein on one felony count of solicitation of prostitution. (The a... | Palm Beach County, FL | View |
| 2006-05-01 | N/A | Krischer refers case to state grand jury; Epstein indicted on minor charge. | State Court | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | County grand jury indicted Epstein on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Grand jury indictment of Jeffrey Epstein on felony charge of solicitation of prostitution. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2006-01-01 | N/A | Epstein was indicted on a charge of felony solicitation of prostitution following a grand jury he... | Palm Beach | View |
EFTA00038830.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between a federal investigator and a witness in the Epstein investigation. The investigator informs the witness they are an 'important witness' and issues a Grand Jury Subpoena for New York, while offering a video conference as an alternative to appearing in person. The witness expresses concern about traveling to NYC due to Covid-19 and asks if they can instead meet with the FBI in Washington, D.C.
EFTA00038738.pdf
An email chain from January 2021 between federal investigators and a witness. The investigators issue a Grand Jury Subpoena to the individual, describing them as an 'important witness' to the investigation. Due to COVID-19 concerns and the witness's reluctance to travel to the NYC Grand Jury (asking instead to meet the FBI in DC), the parties agree to conduct a video interview, which is scheduled for early February 2021.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022027.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a book (likely by James Patterson) detailing the legal aftermath for Epstein's employee, Alfredo Rodriguez. It describes Rodriguez attempting to sell material evidence (including victim names) to an undercover agent for $50,000, his subsequent arrest in 2010, and his 18-month prison sentence—contrasted with Epstein's lenient work release. The second page discusses the relationship between Prince Andrew, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell, mentioning visits to Windsor Castle and Sandringham in 2000.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017626.jpg
This document is a page from a legal analysis (likely a law journal article or brief) submitted to the House Oversight Committee, indicated by the Bates stamp. It discusses the legal definition of a 'target' of investigation by the DOJ and argues for a parallel definition for 'victims' under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Section B specifically applies this legal test to the Jeffrey Epstein case, stating as fact that he sexually abused over thirty minor girls between 2001 and 2007.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017367.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript draft (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the context of these document releases) criticizing attorney Robert Bennett's handling of the Paula Jones case and the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The author argues Bennett made critical errors by allowing Clinton to be deposed on his sex life and by affirming Lewinsky's affidavit without clarification. The text ends with the author noting they received a call from a White House associate urging them to contact Monica Lewinsky.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017361.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a manuscript (possibly by Alan Dershowitz, given the style and context) analyzing the legal strategy of President Bill Clinton during the Monica Lewinsky scandal. The text critiques the decision to allow Clinton to testify before the grand jury and discusses a conversation between the author and Clinton at a party on Martha's Vineyard regarding the Paula Jones lawsuit. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of a discovery production.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021787.jpg
This document details the legal proceedings and lifestyle of Jeffrey Epstein, contrasting his opulent life on his private island with his status as a sex offender facing prosecution. It covers the timeline of allegations starting in 2005 involving a minor, the involvement of high-profile defense lawyers like Kenneth Starr and Alan Dershowitz, and the eventual involvement of the U.S. Attorney's office in Miami.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021545.jpg
An FBI FD-302 report detailing an attempted interview with a female subject in New York. The subject refused to speak without her attorney (located in NY 10075) and was served a Grand Jury Subpoena for an appearance in Florida. Later that day, the subject called the FBI agent to ask the purpose of the inquiry; when told it was regarding Jeffrey Epstein, she replied 'OK...' and asked about travel arrangements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021449.jpg
This is page 3 of an FBI FD-302 interview report dated February 2, 2007, associated with case 31E-MM-108062. A redacted witness describes a subject's poor work habits (inability to multitask) and dislike of their conduct. The witness also provided documents to agents pursuant to a Grand Jury Subpoena, followed by a review of a report which resulted in further information that is entirely redacted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021127.jpg
This document is an excerpt from Michael Wolff's book 'Siege' (pages 6-7), marked with a House Oversight stamp. It details the role of Hope Hicks in the Trump White House, focusing on her testimony to the House Intelligence Committee regarding 'white lies', her lack of political experience, and her personal relationships with Corey Lewandowski and Rob Porter. It also characterizes Rob Porter as a duplicitous figure ('Eddie Haskell') within the administration and touches on the President's unprofessional interest in Hicks's personal life.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030263.jpg
The document appears to be a narrative report or excerpt from a book concerning the Mueller Investigation, produced to the House Oversight Committee. It details the Special Counsel's concerns regarding the President's absolute pardon power, specifically regarding a potential pardon for Michael Flynn in early June. It outlines the legal strategy the Mueller team prepared to argue that pardoning a witness to protect oneself constitutes a corrupt act and obstruction of justice, despite the broad constitutional authority of the pardon power. Note: This document pertains to the Trump/Mueller investigation and does not contain text related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016443.jpg
This document details the conflict between police (represented by Recarey and Chief Reiter) and the prosecutor (Krischer) regarding the handling of the initial 2006 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It describes how police sought serious charges, but the prosecutor referred the case to a grand jury that only heard from two witnesses, resulting in a minor indictment. Chief Reiter subsequently publicly opposed Krischer, referred the case to the FBI in July 2006, and faced social backlash in Palm Beach.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033552.jpg
This document, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033552', is a placeholder page from a larger document production, likely related to a Grand Jury proceeding. It states that an image, which is part of the evidence, could not be displayed in the compiled format but is available on an original CD-ROM provided to a 'Committee' (presumably the House Oversight Committee). The page is otherwise blank, containing a warning about Grand Jury secrecy and an apparent screen capture artifact from the Flipboard app.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030300.jpg
This document critiques the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case in Palm Beach, questioning why prosecutors, led by State Attorney Barry Krischer, did not pursue more serious charges despite evidence that Epstein knew his victims were teenagers. It details efforts by Epstein's legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, to discredit the victims and highlights a lenient plea deal offered by the state. The text also notes allegations of witness intimidation and includes a quote from Epstein's lawyer admitting girls were at the house.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012463.jpg
This document is a transcript of a deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned about their knowledge of another alleged victim of Epstein. The witness, represented by a lawyer named Mr. Herman, denies knowing or ever meeting this other person, who is also represented by Mr. Herman and is suing Epstein for $50 million. The witness states they are 'not allowed to know each other' and can only identify individuals by pictures, not names.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012457.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or testimony where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, likely drove them to a Grand Jury testimony when they were 14 or 15. The witness also admits to lying on their MySpace page about their income, claiming 'as a joke' to have made a quarter-million dollars a year.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012456.jpg
This document is page 61 of a legal transcript where a questioner interrogates a witness about changing their age on a MySpace profile from 18 to their true age, four days before testifying to a Grand Jury. The questioner asks if a detective from Palm Beach instructed the witness to make this change, which the witness denies, also claiming not to remember the specific event or MySpace profile due to having had many.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012455.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies on the witness's MySpace profiles, specifically their stated age (18 vs. 19) and the timing of an age change made just four days before a scheduled Grand Jury testimony. The witness admits to lying about their age to use the platform but claims not to know what the questioner is talking about regarding the suspicious timing.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity