HOUSE_OVERSIGHT
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
irr.
|
Document production |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
This document
|
Evidentiary document |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
This document
|
Was produced for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Submitted document to |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012388.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum from Assistant Attorney General Walter Dellinger regarding the President's constitutional authority to decline enforcement of a law believed to be unconstitutional, even after signing it. The analysis relies on legal precedent, including the Myers case, and historical examples from Presidents Eisenhower and Roosevelt. Despite the user's query, this document has no discernible connection to Jeffrey Epstein, his associates, or any related activities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387.jpg
This document is a legal memorandum, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012387', outlining the constitutional basis for a U.S. President to refuse to enforce a statute believed to be unconstitutional. It details the President's duty to defend executive power and uses the 1926 Supreme Court case Myers v. United States, involving President Wilson, as a key historical precedent. The document contains no information related to Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice (DOJ) legislative analysis, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382'. The DOJ expresses its opposition to several subsections of proposed legislation (Sections 234 and 236) concerning child trafficking and the management of unaccompanied minors, arguing the proposals are burdensome, based on unreliable findings, and too restrictive. The department advocates for greater flexibility for agencies like DHS and HHS and opposes granting HHS access to sensitive law enforcement databases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012381.jpg
This document is a commentary from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes outlined in Sections 224, 231, 232, and 233 related to human trafficking laws. The DOJ argues that the proposed changes are unnecessary, burdensome, or based on a misunderstanding of existing laws and departmental procedures. The document defends current practices, including the use of a wide range of statutes like the Mann Act and collaborations with various organizations for training and enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012380.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum arguing against proposed legislative changes that would expand federal jurisdiction over prostitution, pimping, and adult sex tourism. The DOJ contends that such an expansion is unnecessary, would strain federal resources, and would divert law enforcement from its core anti-trafficking mission, particularly the prosecution of child sex tourism. The document analyzes specific sections of a bill, consistently opposing the federalization of crimes it believes are better handled at the state and local level.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012379.jpg
This Department of Justice (DOJ) document outlines the department's opposition to several proposed legislative amendments concerning human trafficking, specifically sections 214 and 221 of an unspecified bill. The DOJ argues that the changes are redundant, create legally problematic strict liability offenses without an affirmative defense, and improperly federalize crimes like pandering and pimping that are historically handled at the state level. The DOJ asserts that its existing authority under laws like the Mann Act is sufficient for prosecuting federal trafficking crimes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012378.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377.jpg
This document is a legal analysis from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a law concerning human trafficking, likely the Immigration and Nationality Act. The DOJ argues against changes that would limit the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, remove the Attorney General from the victim certification process, and delay law enforcement's involvement in identifying victims. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377', does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012376.jpg
This document, page 5 of a submission to House Oversight, is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes regarding human trafficking. The DOJ opposes several provisions, such as extending a victim's 'continued presence' during a civil suit and removing the Attorney General's role in T-visa eligibility. The DOJ also recommends specific textual changes to avoid creating new legal liabilities for the government and to consolidate authority under the Attorney General rather than a new task force.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012375.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes related to human trafficking. The DOJ opposes certain sections, such as naming specific hotlines (Section 110) and granting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sole authority over 'extreme hardship' determinations (Section 201). While deferring to DHS on some T-visa eligibility changes, the DOJ argues for its own inclusion in key decisions and provides a more accurate description of the nature of threats made by traffickers against victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012374.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis objecting to three sections of a proposed anti-trafficking act. The DOJ argues against Section 107 on separation of powers grounds, Section 108 for proposing a logistically difficult and insecure interagency database, and Section 109 for interfering with the President's policy-making authority. The document is part of a larger collection labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' but does not contain any specific information about Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012373.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed anti-trafficking legislation, marked as page 2 of a collection from 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The DOJ raises concerns about several sections, recommending amendments to ensure U.S. international standards mirror domestic policies that prioritize both sex and labor trafficking. The department also advocates for greater flexibility in partnering with aid organizations and in allowing the Secretary of State to evaluate foreign governments' anti-trafficking efforts on a case-by-case basis, especially concerning cases with lenient sentences for cooperating defendants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012371.jpg
This document is a divider page, labeled 'TAB 11', from a larger set of records. The footer contains the Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012371', indicating its origin from a U.S. House Oversight Committee production. The page itself does not contain any substantive information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012370.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of an interview with an unnamed female witness, likely for a congressional investigation by 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The witness expresses significant fear of an unnamed man ('he'), described by the interviewer as a 'money investor' who allegedly lied about his profession. The interviewer attempts to reassure the witness that she is not in danger and asks her to report any further contact regarding the investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012369.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of an interview with a witness ('A') detailing a sexual encounter with an unnamed male ('he'), for which she was paid $300. The interviewer ('Q') also questions the witness about a female associate ('she'), presents a photo lineup from which the witness cannot make an identification, and instructs the witness on the confidentiality of the open investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012368.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview with an alleged victim of Jeffrey Epstein, detailing three encounters where she was paid for massages. She describes being coached to lie about her age (17), the escalating nature of the requests, and payments received, including $300 for taking her shirt off. The interviewee also mentions her fear and knowledge of other girls involved, one of whom allegedly received a car and money for a trip to Europe from the subject.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012367.jpg
This document is a draft transcript from a House Oversight investigation, detailing an interview with a female witness about providing massages to an unnamed man. She recounts visiting his home three to four times, where he masturbated during the sessions and repeatedly offered her money to get naked, which she mostly refused. A separate woman was paid $200 for bringing the witness to the house, and the witness states that "half of the school knew about it."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012366.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of an interview with a woman who describes providing a massage to a man, referred to as 'Jeffrey'. She recounts being paid $200, being asked to remove her clothes, and the man masturbating under a towel during the massage. The interviewee notes seeing pictures of naked people in the house and contradicts herself on whether she told the man to stop.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012365.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of a police interview with a woman who describes her involvement with Jeffrey Epstein. She recounts being recruited at age 17, while in high school and trying to make money, to give Epstein a massage at his home on 'El Brillo'. The witness details being taken to the house by a woman named 'Faith', observing other girls there, and her subsequent decision to stop going after being contacted by one of Epstein's assistants.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012361.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of an interview, likely conducted by detectives, with a female witness (A). The witness recounts two visits to a man's (Jeffrey's) house. On the second visit, she gave him a massage for $200, but became uncomfortable and scared after being told that the man would expect more on subsequent visits, implying sexual acts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012360.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of a police interview conducted on October 4, 2005, with an 18-year-old female. The witness details her introduction to Jeffrey Epstein through a friend for a massage appointment approximately one year prior, when she was 17. She describes feeling uncomfortable and scared by Epstein's behavior, which she says was consistent with stories she heard about his interactions with other girls, including becoming more demanding and flirtatious over time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012359.jpg
This document is the cover page for a draft transcript of a taped interview concerning Jeffrey Epstein. The document is marked with a House Oversight identifier ('HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012359') and indicates the interview subject is Jeffrey Epstein, but the name of the person interviewed has been redacted. No date or other specific details of the interview are provided on this page.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012358.jpg
This document is a simple divider page labeled 'TAB 9'. It includes a footer with the Bates number 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012358', indicating it is part of a larger set of documents from a House Oversight investigation. The page itself contains no substantive information related to the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012357.jpg
This document is a draft transcript of a police interview conducted by Detective Recarey. The conversation focuses on the attitudes of several unnamed 'girls' involved in an investigation, with the interviewee stating they 'don't care' about their actions. The detective discusses strategy, including the intent to interview a specific girl who is about to leave for college, before the tape recording ends.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012356.jpg
This document is a heavily redacted draft transcript of an interview conducted by Detective Recarey and an unidentified male speaker with a witness. The interview focuses on a group of girls, their phone numbers, and their social connections, with the witness confirming they are a close-knit group where 'they all know each other.' The investigators are trying to identify individuals who were with 'Jeff' and seek leads, such as a person named Jen Reyes, for further introductions.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity