HOUSE_OVERSIGHT
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
irr.
|
Document production |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
This document
|
Evidentiary document |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
This document
|
Was produced for |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bank of America Merrill Lynch
|
Submitted document to |
5
|
1 |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012469.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript showing a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Mr. Leopold is objecting to the line of questioning, arguing for professionalism and accusing Mr. Tein of harassing the witness. Mr. Tein urges Mr. Leopold to conclude his objection so that he can continue asking questions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012468.jpg
This document is a single page from a contentious deposition transcript, identified by a House Oversight control number. Attorney Mr. Tein aggressively questions a female witness (possibly named Saige) about her family speaking to reporters, leading to a heated argument with the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, who threatens to end the deposition over Mr. Tein's unprofessional conduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012467.jpg
This document is a two-page transcript of a deposition where an unnamed individual is questioned about a 'deal' between their father and Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly. The witness states they only know of a single phone call between the two that occurred a year or two prior, and denies that they, their mother, or their sister ever spoke with reporters or received money from Connolly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012466.jpg
This document is a transcript from a deposition, likely dated September 29, 2010, where an individual is questioned about their knowledge of a financial arrangement between Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly and their father. The interviewee admits to being generally aware that they 'talked' but denies knowing any details of the arrangement or if any money was actually exchanged.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012465.jpg
This document is a transcript of an interview (page 70), likely from September 29, 2004, where an unidentified individual is questioned about several people in relation to Jeffrey Epstein. The interviewee claims a person named Zack knows about an event that happened at Mr. Epstein's house four years prior and is also questioned about their associations with Nick (linked to a missing person report) and Patrick (linked to an illegal firearm).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012463.jpg
This document is a transcript of a deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned about their knowledge of another alleged victim of Epstein. The witness, represented by a lawyer named Mr. Herman, denies knowing or ever meeting this other person, who is also represented by Mr. Herman and is suing Epstein for $50 million. The witness states they are 'not allowed to know each other' and can only identify individuals by pictures, not names.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012462.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from approximately September 29, 2004, identified by a House Oversight bates stamp. An unidentified witness, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a person named Steven. The witness states she visited Steven's apartment once 'this past weekend' but does not know the address and that they 'no longer speak'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012461.jpg
This document is page 66 of a deposition or interview transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about their family and connections related to the Epstein case. The witness clarifies that 'Paul' is their mother's husband, not their sister's boyfriend, and confirms they have spoken with a 'Brett [REDACTED]' who knows the basics about an unspecified incident that occurred at Mr. Epstein's house.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012460.jpg
This document is page 65 of a legal transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about the identity of a woman they were in a car with. The witness claims not to know the woman's name but had previously described her as "dark like a Spanish girl." Mr. Tein accuses the witness of lying to the police about the woman's identity, which the witness denies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012458.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The focus is on a prior tape-recorded statement the witness allegedly gave to police 'three years ago', accusing Jeffrey Epstein of attempting to murder her father by tampering with his car tires. The witness denies making such a statement, while the attorney confronts her with a direct quote from her alleged police report.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012457.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or testimony where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, likely drove them to a Grand Jury testimony when they were 14 or 15. The witness also admits to lying on their MySpace page about their income, claiming 'as a joke' to have made a quarter-million dollars a year.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012456.jpg
This document is page 61 of a legal transcript where a questioner interrogates a witness about changing their age on a MySpace profile from 18 to their true age, four days before testifying to a Grand Jury. The questioner asks if a detective from Palm Beach instructed the witness to make this change, which the witness denies, also claiming not to remember the specific event or MySpace profile due to having had many.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012455.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies on the witness's MySpace profiles, specifically their stated age (18 vs. 19) and the timing of an age change made just four days before a scheduled Grand Jury testimony. The witness admits to lying about their age to use the platform but claims not to know what the questioner is talking about regarding the suspicious timing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012454.jpg
This document is page 59 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page. The witness confirms the page is theirs and admits to having lied about their age, stating they were 18, because of a rule on the platform that required users to be that age to post.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012453.jpg
This document is a transcript from page 58 of a deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about lying about their age. The witness denies lying to buy beer or on their MySpace pages in general but admits to lying about being 18 in reference to 'Exhibit 26-01' and denies lying about being 19 in reference to 'Exhibit 33'. Other attorneys, Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold, are also present and interject.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012452.jpg
This document is page 57 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned about her past. She states she got a belly piercing at age 14 and met Epstein around her 14th or 15th birthday. The witness denies accusations of lying about her age to get piercings or to enter bars using fake driver's licenses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012451.jpg
This document is page 56 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about deleting their MySpace page after receiving a subpoena. The witness confirms the deletion but claims it was a regular habit, not an attempt to hide information. Mr. Tein then accuses the witness of frequently lying about their age, which the witness denies, while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012450.jpg
This document is page 55 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The questioning covers an altercation at a restaurant involving Mr. Epstein's process servers and the police, as well as the witness's decision to delete their MySpace page just days before the deposition. The witness denies the attorney's allegations about the restaurant incident but confirms the timing of the MySpace deletion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012448.jpg
This document is a page from a contentious legal deposition transcript. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about an incident where they allegedly evaded process servers with the help of a manager named Justin. The witness confirms that Justin lied for them by stating they were not present.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012447.jpg
This document is a transcript of a contentious legal proceeding, likely a deposition. It captures a heated exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, who appear to be opposing attorneys, regarding the questioning of an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's conduct, accusing him of berating the witness, leading to a personal argument where names are mistaken and prior court encounters are mentioned.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg
This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012445.jpg
This document is a page from a contentious deposition transcript where an unnamed female witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about evading people by switching name tags at work. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects forcefully, calling the question 'harassment' and refusing to let his client answer, leading to a heated exchange between the lawyers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on an incident where the witness wore someone else's name tag, which they claim was a coincidence, on the same day they were to be served with a subpoena. The witness denies having prior knowledge that process servers were looking for them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443.jpg
This document is a two-page excerpt from a deposition transcript, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443'. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about a photograph (marked 18-001) showing the witness and a redacted friend, connecting the friend's presence to the day the witness was served a subpoena. The transcript also records a tense procedural discussion between the attorneys, Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger, regarding the marking of evidence.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity