Mr. Nurik
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Scott
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Mr. Rothstein | Unknown | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017522.jpg
This document contains pages 126-128 of a legal transcript regarding the case 'In Re: Epstein vs Edwards'. It includes the conclusion of a video conference deposition of Scott Rothstein taken on June 14, 2012, the notary certification by Pearlyck Martin dated June 19, 2012, and a letter dated June 21, 2012, instructing Rothstein (via his attorney Marc Nurik) to review and sign the transcript. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017521.jpg
This document is a four-page condensed transcript (pages 122-125) from a deposition of Mr. Rothstein. Attorney Jack Scarola questions Rothstein to confirm that attorney Brad Edwards had no involvement in illegal activities at the RRA firm or the handling of Epstein cases, which Rothstein confirms. Rothstein acknowledges that lying would violate his agreement with the U.S. government and result in him 'dying in prison.' The transcript concludes with procedural discussions regarding the timeline for reviewing transcripts and a pending motion for summary judgment for Brad Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017513.jpg
These transcript pages document the testimony of Scott Rothstein, who admits to using the Jeffrey Epstein case to further his Ponzi scheme when he needed an influx of money. Rothstein states he learned of Epstein's billionaire status through his partner Russ Adler and internet research. The testimony also covers administrative details of the RRA law firm, specifically how travel expenses were approved for various attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017502.jpg
This is a deposition transcript of a witness named Scott (likely Scott Rothstein of RRA) being questioned by Ms. Haddad. The witness admits that his law firm's operations in 2009 were funded principally by a Ponzi scheme and theft, rather than legitimate revenue. He explicitly confesses to illicit activities involving law enforcement, politicians, judges, and organized crime. The questioning focuses heavily on the firm's involvement with Jeffrey Epstein, revealing there was a specific 'Epstein conference room' at the firm and a firm-wide meeting regarding Epstein in July 2009, alongside a large volume of emails concerning Epstein litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017493.jpg
This document contains pages 10-13 of a deposition transcript, likely from the House Oversight Committee's investigation. The witness discusses hiring practices with their partner 'Stuart' and explicitly admits that the firm's General Counsel, David Boden, acted as a 'consigliere' for 'illegal operations.' The witness details efforts to legitimize the firm by hiring reputable lawyers, specifically focusing on a lawyer named 'Brad' (likely Brad Edwards, given the context), who was highly recommended by 'Russ' and political figures to help 'rescue the firm' with a legitimate tort practice.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity