| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Lipper
|
Subsidiary company of |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
David Ingram
|
Employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Carlo Allegri
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
JEE
|
Communication |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Announcement of the 69th annual Hillman Prizes | New York | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters plans to publish story on lawsuit | N/A | View |
This document page discusses the effectiveness of authoritarian regimes' spending on image beautification and lobbying in democratic nations, arguing that while image campaigns often fail, efforts to influence government changes (such as supporting populist parties) may be more successful. It specifically references Russia's influence in Europe and the US election. The majority of the page is dedicated to endnotes citing various news articles and reports regarding foreign lobbying and political influence.
This document, page 44 of a report titled 'Breaking Down Democracy' stamped by the House Oversight Committee, details the role of Western lobbyists and consultants in aiding authoritarian regimes. It focuses heavily on Paul Manafort's career working for dictators such as Ferdinand Marcos, Mobutu Sese Seko, and Viktor Yanukovych, prior to his role as Donald Trump's 2016 campaign chairman. It also discusses how public relations firms (like Hill+Knowlton and Edelman) have sought contracts to improve the global image of the Chinese government.
This document is page 17 of a Freedom House report discussing modern Russian propaganda techniques, specifically focusing on the conflict in Ukraine, the seizure of Crimea, and the 'irrelevance of truth' in state media. It analyzes how outlets like RT and figures like Kiselyov manipulate narratives to influence public opinion domestically and abroad. **Note:** While the user requested an 'Epstein-related' analysis, this specific page contains no text related to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their network; it carries a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it may be part of a larger congressional inquiry file.
This document is a screenshot of a Reuters Pictures archive page featuring a photograph of Steve Bannon and Dr. Bruce Moskowitz walking together at the Mar-a-Lago Club in Palm Beach. The metadata indicates the photo was imported on December 28 (year truncated) and bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019212, indicating it is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation. The caption notes they were arriving to meet with leaders.
An email from Nicholas Ribis to Jeffrey Epstein dated August 11, 2017, forwarding a news article about the Mueller investigation. The article details Paul Manafort's legal troubles, including an FBI raid on his home, pressure to cooperate regarding Trump Jr.'s meeting with a Russian lawyer, and investigations into money laundering involving his business associates and son-in-law.
This document is a fragment of an email chain containing signature blocks and legal disclaimers. It includes contact information for Reuters correspondent David Ingram and a recurring legal disclaimer asserting that the information is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein). The disclaimer directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if the message was received in error. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
An email chain from April 28, 2016, detailing a Reuters press inquiry regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The chain shows Martin Weinberg forwarding the inquiry to Epstein, who then discusses it with Michael Wolff; Wolff comments that Trump could likely 'wave thus away' and offers his assistance, while Epstein dismisses the accuser as 'deranaged' [sic].
The document captures the tail end of an email communication. It lists contact details for David Ingram of Thomson Reuters, followed by a confidentiality disclaimer stating the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directing errors to 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The document is stamped with a House Oversight Bates number.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, culminating in Jeffrey Epstein forwarding a message to journalist Michael Wolff with the comment 'here we go.' The chain originates with a request for comment from Reuters reporter David Ingram to attorney Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman (identified in the attachment as Katie Johnson) in 1994. Weinberg alerts Epstein that the story will go to press in several hours.
This document fragment captures the end of an email communication. It displays contact information for David Ingram of Thomson Reuters, followed by a standard legal disclaimer asserting that the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and directing error notifications to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This email chain from April 28, 2016, tracks a Reuters press inquiry regarding a lawsuit (Katie Johnson v Trump) alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The inquiry was sent by reporter David Ingram to Martin Weinberg, who forwarded it to Epstein. Epstein then forwarded the chain to Tom Barrack with the comment 'nuts but i thought you guys should know,' attaching the complaint PDF.
This document appears to be the footer or signature block of an email. It contains a confidentiality disclaimer stating the communication is the 'property of JEE' (Jeffrey Edward Epstein) and directs recipients to contact 'jeevacation@gmail.com' if received in error. The top of the document contains redacted contact information (Office/Mobile) and a link to Reuters.com. It bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters journalist David Ingram to attorney Martin Weinberg, seeking comment on a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump committed rape in 1994. Weinberg forwards this inquiry to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to Kathy Ruemmler with the complaint attached. A significant portion of the communication between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.
This document is an email dated August 5, 2016, from Will Bohlen to a group of recipients including high-profile attorneys Reid Weingarten and Jason Weinstein. The email shares a Reuters article reporting that Fethullah Gulen's lawyers fear for his life amid extradition demands from Turkey following the July 2016 coup attempt. While the document content is strictly about Gulen, it is likely part of an Epstein-related document dump because recipient Reid Weingarten was one of Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys.
This document is an email dated August 5, 2016, from Will Bohlen to a large group including Michael Keough and attorney Reid Weingarten. The email forwards the text of a Reuters article reporting on a press conference held by Fethullah Gulen's lawyers (including Weingarten) in Washington, where they argued against his extradition to Turkey following a coup attempt. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.
An email chain from April 2016 initiated by a Reuters reporter contacting Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit alleging Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwards this to Epstein, who forwards it to Michael Wolff. Wolff replies suggesting that 'Donald' (Trump) is the only person who can 'wave thus away' and offers his assistance to Epstein.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, originating with a Reuters reporter, David Ingram, contacting attorney Martin Weinberg for comment regarding a lawsuit filed in California. The lawsuit alleged that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The email was forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein, and subsequently by Epstein to Lesley Groff, who responded with concern ('so sorry...'). Portions of the email chain between Weinberg and Epstein are redacted under privilege.
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103, p. 904) submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses the legal theory of 'federal redundancy' and the 'dual sovereignty' doctrine (citing Gamble v. United States), arguing that federal prosecutors serve as a check on local prosecutors in cases of police misconduct. While the text focuses on police violence and double jeopardy laws, its inclusion in this production is likely relevant to legal arguments surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement and whether federal charges could supersede state agreements.
This page from a legal article discusses the concept of "enforcement redundancy" as a tool to combat criminal law underenforcement, particularly in cases of police violence and sexual assault. It analyzes the U.S. approach of federalism-based redundancy compared to other mechanisms like private prosecution or judicial review used internationally. The text argues that while federal intervention helps with public corruption and some civil rights violations, it has a mixed record on police violence and has failed to adequately address sexual assault underenforcement.
This document serves as a briefing or news summary regarding the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) and its diplomatic fallout with Saudi Arabia. It details the Saudi Foreign Minister's warning about the erosion of sovereign immunity and addresses threats that Saudi Arabia might liquidate $750 billion in US assets, though the minister later clarified they intend to maintain their investments. The document is part of a House Oversight collection.
This document appears to be a printout of a digital news feed (likely Wall Street Journal given the 'WSJ' and 'Potomac Watch' headers) containing various political headlines. It highlights articles about John McCain's views on Putin, the Mueller investigation's interest in Ford records, and questions regarding FBI surveillance of the 2016 Trump campaign. The document includes a caption describing a photo of Devin Nunes at CPAC on February 24.
This document is an endnotes/bibliography page (Appendix 2, Page 185) from a House Oversight Committee report. It lists citations for articles and reports published between 2016 and 2018, focusing heavily on Chinese foreign influence, particularly in Western academia (Confucius Institutes), telecommunications (Huawei), and politics (David Cameron's appointment). The citations reference major publications such as The Financial Times, The Guardian, Reuters, and Foreign Policy.
This document (Page 150, Appendix 2) is an excerpt from a report analyzing Australian politics, specifically focusing on legislation and strategies to counter foreign interference from the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). It details actions taken by the Turnbull and Morrison governments in 2018, including the establishment of task forces and the passing of transparency schemes. While labeled with a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, the text on this specific page does not contain any information regarding Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their associates; it is entirely focused on Australian-Chinese geopolitical relations.
This document is page 119 of a House Oversight Committee report (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020578), specifically Section 7. It consists entirely of endnotes/bibliography citations from 2016-2018 (and one from 1993) focused on US-China relations, corporate bowing to Chinese censorship (Facebook, Apple, Marriott), and technology transfer concerns (Google, Tsinghua University). There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific network in this document; it appears to be part of a broader legislative inquiry into foreign influence or trade.
This document is a bibliography page (Section 7, page 117) from a House Oversight Committee report. It lists sources from 2015-2018 focusing on Chinese foreign influence, money laundering scandals involving Chinese banks (AgBank, China Construction Bank, ICBC), and political donations affecting US elections (specifically mentioning the Clinton Foundation and Terry McAuliffe). The text portion analyzes how the Chinese Communist Party leverages foreign corporations and joint ventures to legitimize its rule and enforce political compliance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity