Reuters

Organization
Mentions
405
Relationships
4
Events
2
Documents
175
Also known as:
Reuters News Thomson Reuters Reuters.com Thomson Reuters / Westlaw Thomson Reuters (Westlaw) Thompson Reuters Reuters News / Thomson Reuters Westlaw / Thomson Reuters reuters.com Reuters America LLC Reuters Online

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
4 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
organization Lipper
Subsidiary company of
7
1
View
person David Ingram
Employment
6
1
View
person Carlo Allegri
Employee
5
1
View
organization JEE
Communication
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2019-01-01 N/A Announcement of the 69th annual Hillman Prizes New York View
2016-04-28 N/A Reuters plans to publish story on lawsuit N/A View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020557.jpg

This document is page 98 of a House Oversight Committee report (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020557), containing endnotes 3 through 19. The citations primarily document Chinese state media influence operations, propaganda efforts under Xi Jinping, and the activities of James Su (CEO of EDI) in facilitating Chinese broadcasting in the US. Sources include Reuters, Xinhua, The New York Times, and FCC filings. There is no text related to Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.

Bibliography / endnotes page (house oversight committee report)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020552.jpg

This document appears to be page 93 of a House Oversight Committee report (stamped HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020552). It details the Chinese government's censorship and pressure tactics against Western media organizations, including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg News. Specifically, it highlights how China uses visa delays and website blocking to punish negative coverage, and alleges that Bloomberg News self-censored a story in 2013 to protect its financial data terminal business in China. Note: This specific page contains no references to Jeffrey Epstein.

Government report / house oversight committee document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020513.jpg

This document is page 54 of a report (likely from the House Oversight Committee, given the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT') containing endnotes/references numbered 6 through 21. The citations focus heavily on Chinese political influence in American higher education, specifically regarding Confucius Institutes, the 'Hanban,' and interference on U.S. campuses. While the document is part of a larger dataset often associated with investigations, this specific page contains no direct mentions of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates.

Bibliography / endnotes page (house oversight committee report)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020477.jpg

This document appears to be page 18 of a House Oversight Committee report or production, containing endnotes (citations 6-12). The text focuses on US-China relations, specifically Chinese influence operations, lobbying efforts in Washington DC, and foreign travel regulations. While the user identified this as Epstein-related, this specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their known associates; it strictly lists bibliographic sources regarding Chinese foreign policy and influence.

Report endnotes / bibliography (house oversight committee)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017074.jpg

The document is a single page from a participant list for the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting in 2011. It lists attendees alphabetically (surnames F-F), including high-profile figures such as Niall Ferguson, Barney Frank, and various CEOs and government officials. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a larger production of documents to the US House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into Jeffrey Epstein's associations, although Epstein's name does not appear on this specific page.

Participant list / event roster
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017071.jpg

This document is a page from the participant list of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2011. It lists high-profile international figures including business executives (e.g., Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan, Robert Diamond of Barclays, Oleg Deripaska of Basic Element), government officials (e.g., Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart), and media figures. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was obtained as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation.

Participant list / directory (house oversight committee record)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016794.jpg

This document is a printout of a Reuters web article with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016794. It features a snippet by Lawrence Hurley reporting on the U.S. Supreme Court agreeing to review a Trump administration action, and a headline announcing the appointment of Melania Trump's spokeswoman as the new White House press secretary. A large image is missing from the top of the document due to a display error.

News clipping / web printout (house oversight committee production)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017931.jpg

This document is page 28 of a Westlaw legal report regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). It discusses a legal motion for reconsideration filed by NCB (National Commercial Bank) regarding personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA. The text analyzes legal standards for reconsideration and jurisdiction, citing various precedents (Steel Co., Bush, etc.), but does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page, despite the House Oversight stamp.

Legal opinion / court case reporter (westlaw)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929.jpg

A Westlaw printout of a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) bearing the stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017929. The text detailed the court's decision to dismiss complaints against various entities (including Mar-Jac Poultry, IIIT, and African Muslim Agency) alleged to be part of the 'SAAR Network' and accused of funding al Qaeda or Islamic Jihad. The court ruled that the plaintiffs failed to provide specific factual grounds that these entities knew their donations were funding terrorism. There is no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell in the text of this specific page.

Legal opinion / court order (westlaw printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017925.jpg

This document is page 22 of a Westlaw printout of a 2005 court opinion titled 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001.' It details legal standards for civil liability under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA), Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), and civil RICO statutes (Section 1962), specifically defining 'material support' for terrorism. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional production (possibly related to the Epstein investigation given the context of the request), this specific page discusses 9/11 litigation and does not explicitly name Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell.

Legal opinion/court document (westlaw printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017921.jpg

This document is a page from a 2005 legal opinion (In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) discussing the court's jurisdiction over Saudi defendants Prince Salman and Prince Naif. It details plaintiffs' arguments that Prince Salman funded terrorist-linked entities (IIRO, WAMY, etc.) and establishes his contacts with the U.S., including stock ownership in Texas and a 1989 meeting with George H.W. Bush. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.

Legal opinion / court case printout (westlaw)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017920.jpg

This document is page 17 of a legal opinion titled 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539), bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017920. The text discusses the court's lack of subject matter jurisdiction over Saudi Prince Naif and Prince Salman regarding their official acts under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), while analyzing whether personal jurisdiction exists for alleged private acts or conspiracy with al Qaeda. It details Prince Naif's role as Minister of Interior, his 1994 actions against Osama bin Laden, and the legal standards for establishing jurisdiction under New York's long-arm statute and conspiracy theories.

Legal opinion / court decision (westlaw printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017919.jpg

This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion regarding the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the dismissal of claims against the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and Prince Salman and Prince Naif based on the discretionary function exception to sovereign immunity, ruling that their funding decisions were policy-based and thus immune from suit.

Court opinion page / legal document
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017909.jpg

This document is page 6 of a Westlaw legal research printout referencing the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001'. It lists legal headnotes (points 25-31) summarizing court rulings on various statutes including the Torture Victim Protection Act, New York negligence law, the Antiterrorism Act, and RICO statutes in the context of 9/11 litigation. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a document production to Congress (possibly related to broader financial investigations), the specific text on this page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their specific associates.

Legal research / case law headnotes (westlaw printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017906.jpg

This document is a Westlaw printout of legal headnotes from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001'. It details legal precedents regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), specifically confirming immunity for a Saudi Arabian relief agency and its chairman regarding allegations of funding the 9/11 attacks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, indicating it was part of a Congressional investigation production.

Legal case law printout / westlaw database record
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027780.jpg

This document is a digital forensics log of a message thread from June 15, 2019, between 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an address associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The exchange includes missed phone calls, the sharing of a NYTimes/Reuters article regarding a New Jersey airport, and a copy-pasted definition of 'Subjective Probability' sent by the redacted party. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.

Electronic communication log / forensics report
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027671.jpg

This document is a forensic log of digital messages exchanged between the account 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (a known alias of Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual on May 1st and 2nd, 2019. The conversation focuses on financial matters, referencing 'growth', a 'signed dollar', and 'the smell of victory'. Epstein also shares a Reuters link regarding China's forex reserves, suggesting the discussion relates to international finance or currency markets.

Digital message log (forensic extraction)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026951.jpg

A Goldman Sachs Investment Management Division presentation slide titled 'Recent Attacks Put the US on High Alert.' The document outlines geopolitical tensions in the Middle East occurring in May 2019, specifically detailing sabotage on oil tankers, Houthi drone attacks on Saudi infrastructure, and rocket fire in Baghdad. It includes a map of Saudi oil infrastructure and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation.

Presentation slide / investment report
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026866.jpg

This document is an email dated August 1, 2018, from Richard Kahn to Jeffrey Epstein. The email contains a link to a CNBC article titled 'Trump urges Attorney General Sessions to stop Mueller probe 'right now'' and includes the article's photo caption describing a press conference at the White House.

Email
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028970.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by a Reuters reporter asking attorney Martin Weinberg about a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email is forwarded by Weinberg to Epstein (using the alias jeevacation@gmail.com), who then forwards it to his legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Roy Black, and Jack Goldberger. The content of the attorneys' discussions is redacted under attorney-client privilege.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028969.jpg

This document appears to be a fragment of an email chain or contact sheet bearing the Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028969. The top section lists contact details for a Reuters News correspondent (with specific numbers redacted). The bottom section contains a legal confidentiality disclaimer asserting that the communication is the property of 'JEE' (Jeffrey E. Epstein) and directs inquiries to the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'.

Email signature / contact information page
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028968.jpg

This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, among Jeffrey Epstein's legal team (Roy Black, Alan Dershowitz, Jack Goldberger, Martin Weinberg) regarding a media inquiry from Reuters. David Ingram of Reuters contacted Martin Weinberg seeking comment on a newly filed federal lawsuit in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. The legal team's internal discussions regarding the response are redacted as privileged.

Email chain
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023415.jpg

This document appears to be the final page (page 55) of a Westlaw printout related to the legal case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' The text is a fragment of a legal opinion citing 'Terrorist Attacks III' and discussing links between charities and terrorist networks. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023415' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely within a larger batch of documents involving financial investigations.

Legal document / westlaw printout
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023413.jpg

This document contains the footnotes (citations 75-96) from a 2012 legal document titled 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It references evidentiary exhibits, FBI reports, and Treasury Department documents concerning the financing of terrorism, specifically alleging that senior officers of al Rajhi Bank knowingly sponsored al Qaeda. The document mentions the 'Golden Chain' donor list and cites the 9/11 Commission Monograph on Terrorist Financing multiple times.

Legal citation list / footnotes (westlaw printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023412.jpg

This document appears to be a page (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023412) from a Westlaw printout of the legal case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'. It contains footnotes 52 through 74, which cite various intelligence reports (CIA, UN, Interpol) and testimonies (Richard Clarke, Lee Wolosky) regarding Al Qaida, Usama Bin Laden, and terrorist financing. Footnote 70 specifically identifies officials of the Al Rajhi Bank as the 'Al Rajhi Defendants'. While the document is part of a House Oversight collection, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.

Legal document (westlaw printout of case citations/footnotes)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity