| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Lipper
|
Subsidiary company of |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
David Ingram
|
Employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Carlo Allegri
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
JEE
|
Communication |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Announcement of the 69th annual Hillman Prizes | New York | View |
| 2016-04-28 | N/A | Reuters plans to publish story on lawsuit | N/A | View |
This document is a page from a legal brief or opinion related to the litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re: Terrorist Attacks). It argues against a district court's dismissal of claims, contending that defendants who provided material support to al-Qaeda through intermediaries or 'front charities' should be held liable under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA). It specifically critiques the reasoning of Judge Daniels, comparing it to his predecessor Judge Casey, and cites various legal precedents regarding indirect support of terrorism.
This document is a page from a legal opinion (cited as 2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It discusses the dismissal of intentional tort claims (assault, battery, IIED), arguments regarding statutes of limitations in New York versus Virginia and Pennsylvania, and equitable tolling due to the clandestine nature of the conspiracy involving al-Qaeda. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406', indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely included in a production by a financial institution or entity being investigated for connections to high-profile cases, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.
This document is page 42 of a Westlaw printout concerning 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It is a legal text discussing the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), customary international law regarding terrorism, and the Military Commissions Act of 2006. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp (indicating it is part of a Congressional investigation production), the text itself focuses entirely on legal precedents regarding 9/11 and al-Qaeda liability; there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein or his associates on this specific page.
This document is a page from a legal opinion (2012 WL 257568) concerning the litigation 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It discusses the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and establishes that facilitating international terrorism violates customary international law, citing various UN Security Council resolutions and case precedents. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023400' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee, possibly related to investigations into financial institutions.
This document is a page from a Westlaw legal printout (2012 WL 257568) regarding 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001.' It outlines legal arguments criticizing a district court for ignoring plaintiffs' pleadings against Al Rajhi Bank. The text details allegations that Al Rajhi Bank knowingly provided material support, banking services, and donation management to al-Qaeda and several front charities (IIRO, MWL, WAMY, etc.), as well as providing services to 9/11 hijacker Abdulaziz al-Omari. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document is a page from a legal brief regarding litigation over the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (2012 WL 257568). It argues that the District Court improperly dismissed Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) claims against several financial defendants, including Al Rajhi Bank and Saudi American Bank, for allegedly providing material support to al-Qaeda. The text cites various legal precedents to argue that the ATA should be construed broadly to cut off funding sources to terrorist groups. Although the prompt mentions Epstein, the document text refers strictly to 9/11 litigation, though the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' suggests it may have been part of a broader congressional investigation.
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001) retrieved from Westlaw, bearing a House Oversight stamp. It details the financial infrastructure supporting al-Qaeda, specifically implicating financial institutions such as Al Shamal, FIBS, Al Rajhi Bank, and National Commercial Bank (NCB) in knowingly providing services and funneling money to the terrorist organization. The text cites testimony confirming that high-ranking banking officials had direct ties to Osama bin Laden and that the banks used charity fronts to channel funds for 'financial jihad.' Note: While labeled as an Epstein-related document request, this specific page contains no mention of Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell; it focuses entirely on 9/11 terrorist financing litigation.
This document is an excerpt from a legal opinion related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks litigation, discussing allegations against various individuals and charities (such as Al Haramain and Muwafaq Foundation) for supporting al-Qaeda. It details designations of individuals as Specially Designated Global Terrorists and outlines how certain financial institutions, particularly Islamic banks, allegedly facilitated the transfer of resources to al-Qaeda.
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001) produced during a House Oversight investigation (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023378). It details how al-Qaeda utilized a network of ostensible charities, such as the Muslim World League and the International Islamic Relief Organization, to finance operations, launder money, and provide logistical support for terrorism. The text lists specific defendants (Charity Officials) alleged to have knowingly orchestrated this support using their positions within these organizations.
This document is a page from a 2012 legal opinion (printed via Westlaw in 2019) regarding the consolidated multi-district litigation (MDL 1570) surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It outlines the plaintiffs' claims under the Anti-Terrorism Act against banks, charities, and states accused of funding al-Qaeda, and details the procedural history including the transfer of cases to the Southern District of New York and the succession of judges presiding over the matter. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp but does not explicitly name Jeffrey Epstein on this specific page.
This document appears to be page 9 of a legal brief or research document (indicated by the Westlaw footer and Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023369) listing a Table of Authorities. It cites numerous legal cases primarily related to terrorism, banking liability, and civil procedure, including 'United States v. Bin Laden' and 'Weiss v. Nat'l Westminster Bank PLC'. While titled under 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001', the document originates from a House Oversight Committee production, likely related to investigations into financial institutions.
This document is a page from a Table of Authorities, likely from a legal brief or court opinion related to litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (specifically 2012 WL 257568). It lists various legal precedents (case law) alphabetically from 'Abrahams' to 'Chambers', including high-profile cases such as 'Ashcroft v. Iqbal' and several cases involving 'Obama' regarding detainees. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the page itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a Table of Contents and Table of Authorities for a legal filing related to the 'In re: Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' litigation. It outlines legal arguments regarding the Alien Tort Statute (ATS), the Torture Victim Protection Act, and negligence claims against defendants alleged to have materially supported al-Qaeda, specifically mentioning 'NCB' (National Commercial Bank) and 'Sovereign Defendants.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional production, likely related to investigations into financial networks supporting terrorism.
This document is a Table of Contents from a legal filing related to the case 'In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001,' printed from Westlaw in 2019 as part of a House Oversight production. The text outlines legal arguments accusing several financial institutions and individuals (including Al Rajhi Bank, Saudi American Bank, and Saleh Abdullah Kamel) of knowingly or recklessly supporting al-Qaeda through financial means and charities. While part of the House Oversight production likely related to financial investigations, Jeffrey Epstein's name does not appear on this specific page.
This document is a page from a legal filing (likely an appellate brief) related to litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001). It specifically contains the Corporate Disclosure Statement, listing various insurance company appellants (including entities under Fairfax, Munich Re, Allstate, CNA, ACE, Viacom, and AXA) and their parent organizations to declare stock ownership interests. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023363), indicating it was part of a Congressional document production, though no specific individuals or direct links to Jeffrey Epstein appear on this specific page.
This document is page 316 of a bibliography from an academic paper authored by M. Hoffman et al. It lists references regarding evolutionary biology, economics, and psychology, including works by Robert Trivers, E.O. Wilson, and Martin Nowak (a known Epstein associate). The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a congressional investigation document production.
An email from Boris Nikolic to Jeffrey Epstein forwarding a news article from The Atlantic about President Obama nominating Jim Yong Kim to lead the World Bank. The article discusses Kim's background in global health, specifically his work with Partners in Health.
This document appears to be the footer and standard legal disclaimer of an email. It declares the information as confidential, attorney-client privileged, and the 'property of JEE' (presumably Jeffrey E. Epstein). It provides the email address 'jeevacation@gmail.com' for contact if the message was received in error. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032067.
This document is an email chain from April 28, 2016, initiated by Reuters correspondent David Ingram seeking comment from Martin Weinberg regarding a lawsuit filed in California alleging that Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump raped a woman in 1994. Weinberg forwarded this inquiry to Epstein, who subsequently forwarded it to Darren Indyke. The email includes an attachment titled 'katie johnson v trump complaint.pdf', and a significant portion of the correspondence between Weinberg and Epstein is redacted as privileged.
A Morgan Stanley Research 'North America Insight' document (Exhibit 50) containing a comparative financial sheet for Brokers & Asset Managers dated January 26, 2018. The spreadsheet lists financial metrics such as stock price, market cap, AUM (Assets Under Management), and earnings projections (2017-2019) for major financial firms including BlackRock, Apollo Global Management, and Blackstone. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
This document is a page from a Morgan Stanley research report titled 'North America Insight' analyzing the valuation of KKR & Co. It contains a 'Sum-of-the-Parts' (SOTP) analysis (Exhibit 42) projecting values for 2018 based on 3Q17 data, specifically examining the impact of a potential C-Corp conversion. A red box highlights the 'Market Implied Carry Value' at $6.57 under the current price scenario. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025576', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, likely related to financial records subpoenaed in the Epstein inquiry.
A Morgan Stanley Research document titled 'North America Insight' analyzing The Carlyle Group (CG). It presents a Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) valuation and sensitivity analysis for CG, specifically examining the financial impact of a potential C-Corp conversion. The document includes financial tables projecting 2018 earnings, balance sheet assets as of 3Q17, and estimated share prices under different market multiples. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025575, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation production.
This document is page 23 of a Morgan Stanley research report titled 'North America Insight,' focusing on a Sum-of-the-Parts (SOTP) and sensitivity analysis of Ares Management (ARES). It includes financial modeling tables (Exhibits 33, 34, and 35) projecting share prices based on 'C-Corp Conversion' scenarios using Q3 2017 data and 2018 estimates. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025573', indicating it was produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee, likely as part of an investigation into financial institutions connected to Epstein or general private equity scrutiny.
This document is page 22 of a Morgan Stanley research report titled 'North America Insight,' focused on a 'Sum-of-the-Parts' (SOTP) and sensitivity analysis for Apollo Global Management (APO). It features financial models based on Q3 2017 data and 2018 estimates, projecting share prices under different scenarios, specifically regarding a potential C-Corp conversion. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was obtained as part of a congressional investigation, likely related to inquiries into Apollo's financial practices or connections.
A page from a Morgan Stanley equity research report dated around January 2018, analyzing valuation methodologies for alternative asset managers (Alts). It specifically details a 'Bond Yield Approach' for valuing fee-related earnings, referencing Apollo Global Management (APO), Ares, Blackstone, and others. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of the investigation into financial ties to Epstein, likely due to the inclusion of Apollo Global Management (Leon Black).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity