Consor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc.

Organization
Mentions
108
Relationships
0
Events
0
Documents
53

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
No relationships found for this entity.
No events found for this entity.

DOJ-OGR-00033091.jpg

This document is page 103 of a deposition transcript (processed 07/26/17) involving questioning by Mr. Tein. The witness is asked about communications regarding 'the case' with individuals named Roman, Vince, Tiffany Rich, Justin, and Cara. The witness confirms speaking briefly with Tiffany Rich but denies speaking to Vince or knowing a friend named Justin.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033090.jpg

This document is page 102 of a deposition transcript (Bates DOJ-OGR-00033090) recorded by Consor & Associates. An unnamed witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein regarding the identification of several men in a photograph or video, including John Brown, Steven Lavelle, Robbie Shergan, and Brandon Salnal. The witness also identifies a woman named Courtney Sailor and a man named Vince as friends of their sister.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033089.jpg

This is a page from a deposition transcript (page 101) processed on July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about a photograph involving Steven Lavelle and a man identified phonetically as Robbie Shergan. The opposing counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to Mr. Tein interrupting the witness.

Deposition transcript / legal testimony
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033085.jpg

This document is page 97 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about whether she has text messaged FBI agents or federal prosecutors, or if they have shared information with her regarding what 'other girls' have said; she denies both. She also discusses her parents' knowledge of how to contact the FBI, noting that her mother 'doesn't care to know any of this stuff' and mentioning an individual named Paul associated with her mother.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033077.jpg

This is page 89 of a legal deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. The witness is questioned about whether they or their parents spoke to any law firms other than those of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold. The witness denies speaking to others but asks if 'family court matters.' Ultimately, the witness identifies Mr. Leopold as the person who prepared them for that day's deposition.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033075.jpg

This is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 87) involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The text captures a contentious exchange between the lawyers regarding objections and procedure. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they or their mother have spoken to or received money from reporters; the witness answers 'No' to the questions regarding themselves.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033074.jpg

This document is a single page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, detailing a contentious exchange between two individuals, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, who are likely opposing attorneys. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding' and unprofessional conduct, while Mr. Leopold pleads to be allowed to make the record without interruption and calls for professionalism from all parties in the room. The exchange highlights a significant level of conflict and animosity between the two speakers during the legal proceeding.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033073.jpg

This page is a transcript of a deposition involving a female witness being questioned by Mr. Tein while being defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness testifies that her mother and sister have not spoken to reporters ('zero'), but she cannot speak for her father and stepmother as she does not contact them. The exchange becomes heated when the attorneys argue over the line of questioning, with Mr. Tein telling Mr. Leopold to 'Be quiet' and Mr. Leopold threatening to leave if professional conduct is not maintained.

Deposition transcript / legal proceeding
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033072.jpg

This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or interview from July 26, 2017. An unnamed individual is questioned about their knowledge of a relationship and potential financial transactions between their father and Vanity Fair reporter John Connolly. The speaker denies any personal contact with Connolly, denies being offered money, and claims to have limited knowledge of his father's interactions with the reporter, stating they only knew of a single phone call that occurred a year or two prior.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033070.jpg

This document is page 82 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about their knowledge of specific individuals, including Nick Kowalski and Patrick Thomas. The questioning touches on the witness's past behavior, including an incident where they were reported missing by their father, and allegations regarding Thomas possessing an illegal firearm. The document bears a 2017 date stamp and a DOJ production number.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033065.jpg

This page is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned about family members (mother, sister, and mother's husband Paul) living in Georgia. The questioning shifts to whether the witness discussed 'Epstein's case' with Paul, and specifically if they discussed 'what happened in Mr. Epstein's house' with an individual named Brett Albritton, to which the witness confirms Brett knows the basics.

Legal transcript / deposition
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033064.jpg

This document is page 76 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Mr. Tein questions a witness regarding a car ride with an individual named Hayley and another unidentified person described as 'dark like a Spanish girl.' The witness denies knowing a specific redacted individual (alleged to be a good friend) and denies lying to the police. The witness acknowledges speaking about the case with their twin sister (name redacted) but claims the sister does not have an email address.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033059.jpg

This document is page 71 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age on a MySpace page (claiming to be 18) and subsequently changing it to their true age four days before testifying before a Grand Jury. The witness admits to lying about the age initially but claims not to remember changing it back, citing that they had a 'bazillion' MySpace accounts. The page concludes with Mr. Tein asking if the witness remembers Detective Recarey.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033054.jpg

Page 66 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, attorney Mr. Tein, and attorney Mr. Leopold. The questioning focuses on the witness's alleged habit of lying about their age, specifically in relation to MySpace and obtaining body piercings. The witness denies lying to get piercings but clarifies they have one body piercing (excluding ears) after initially stating five.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033050.jpg

This is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Tein questions a redacted witness about an incident at the 'Quarterdeck Tavern' where the witness's manager, Justin, allegedly lied to process servers to hide the witness. The page opens with a contentious exchange between the lawyers before a recess is taken.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033044.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed deponent about a photograph (marked 18-001), in which the deponent identifies themself and Tiffany Rich. Mr. Tein then characterizes Tiffany Rich as the deponent's friend from the Quarterdeck Tavern. Other attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger, are also present and interject to ensure the clarity of the record.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033043.jpg

This is page 55 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about an incident at the Quarterdeck Tavern where she allegedly asked co-workers to lie and switched name tags with a friend named Tiffany to avoid people serving papers. The witness denies asking anyone to lie but admits name tags were switched, claiming it was a coincidence common among staff. Attorneys Leopold and Goldberger discuss the marking of Exhibit 18-001 and photographs.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033042.jpg

This is page 54 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a female witness, accusing her of lying about her name to avoid being served a lawful subpoena and questioning her willingness to repeat a story she told police. Attorney Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the form of the questions and eventually instructs the witness not to answer, prompting Mr. Tein to ask to 'certify' the question. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and a 2017 public records request date.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033040.jpg

This document is page 52 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about whether they received a victim notification letter (confirmed) and if they provided physical evidence to law enforcement. The witness denies providing physical evidence initially, but then clarifies they gave their cell phone to a woman named Michelle Pagan approximately three or four years prior to the deposition.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033037.jpg

This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about conversations they had with their aunt concerning a lawsuit and a 'Mr. Herman'. The witness states that Tiffany Rich never had a conversation with Mr. Herman in their presence, and only answered the door before leaving.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033034.jpg

This is page 46 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Tein and defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness confirms that attorney Jeffrey Herman was the lawyer who first sued Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. The questioning turns to whether Herman advanced the witness's family any money, at which point Mr. Leopold objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033031.jpg

This document is page 43 of a legal deposition transcript (Page 2718 of the larger record). An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a conversation with a woman named Hayley regarding earning money by visiting 'Epstein's house' every weekend. The witness denies making the comment, attributing it to Hayley instead. The testimony also covers the group leaving Epstein's house with money and going to a Marshall's store, with the witness denying they spent the money personally.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033028.jpg

This document is page 40 of a deposition transcript (stamped DOJ-OGR-00033028) involving the cross-examination of a witness by Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on sexual acts (masturbation) and whether the witness previously lied to the police. The witness admits that while she told police Epstein did not touch her, that statement was not 'fully truthful,' and she confirms in this testimony that Epstein did, in fact, touch her.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033016.jpg

This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense and adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. A third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, intervenes to clarify a procedural point amidst the escalating argument.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00033015.jpg

This document is page 27 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from Consor & Associates. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, presumably attorneys. Mr. Leopold objects strongly to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female witness, accusing him of unprofessional conduct, browbeating, and harassment, and threatens to end the proceeding.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity