This document is page 26 of a deposition transcript involving a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The witness is questioned about whether anyone persuaded them to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money before arriving at his house, which the witness denies. The document features a significant procedural argument where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'coaching the witness' during the testimony.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned about potential grooming or recruitment for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein. The questioning focuses on whether individuals named Hayley, Zack Bryan, or Anthony Figueroa, or anyone else, communicated via phone or internet to persuade the witness to engage in sexual acts before they arrived at Epstein's house. The witness denies any such communications occurred and states they do not know who Anthony Figueroa is.
This document is page 22 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, likely attorneys named Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, regarding the proper procedure for making objections. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction, while Mr. Leopold defends his actions by citing the requirements of judges in West Palm Beach.
This document is page 18 of a deposition transcript processed on July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned about a specific message sent via MySpace to a friend. The message discusses having 'court shit on the 20th' and asks the recipient if they 'still have court shit with him,' implying a shared legal struggle involving a male figure. The witness confirms sending the message to a friend but claims to have deleted the MySpace account and cannot recall the specific date.
Page 17 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. The text captures a tense procedural argument between attorneys Leopold, Tein, and Goldberger regarding a break, lateness (9 a.m. vs after 2 p.m.), and professional demeanor. Following a recess, Mr. Tein resumes questioning a witness (whose name is redacted) about the seriousness of the deposition and introduces Exhibit 31-001. The document bears a footer date of 07/26/17 and a DOJ-OGR stamp.
A transcript page from a deposition involving attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The text captures a heated exchange where Leopold requests a break, which Tein resists, accusing Leopold of obstructing the deposition. Leopold explicitly requests that the audio of the deposition be preserved.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving a witness (Ms. [Redacted]) being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold raising objections. The questioning focuses on confirming that an attorney named Mr. Herman filed a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein on the witness's behalf and subsequently held a press conference. The document includes a DOJ Bates stamp and a processing date of 07/26/17.
This document is page 12 of a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they are aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filed a lawsuit on their behalf. Mr. Leopold objects based on attorney-client privilege, specifically referencing conversations between himself and the witness, as well as an 'attorney from Miami'.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Leopold, Goldberger, and Tein, dated July 26, 2017 (based on the footer stamp). The text captures a contentious exchange where Mr. Leopold defends his objections regarding 'improper foundation,' while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein accuse him of wasting time and obstructing the process. Mr. Tein specifically reprimands Leopold for failing to appear earlier in the morning after a separate hearing was cancelled, allegedly breaking a prior agreement.
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness, accompanied by their lawyer, Mr. Leopold, is questioned about a criminal prosecution and a related civil lawsuit. The questioner reveals that Mr. Leopold has recently filed a $50 million lawsuit in federal court against Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is page 4 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates in Florida. It captures the swearing-in of a witness whose name is heavily redacted and the commencement of direct examination by an attorney named Mr. Tein. The footer indicates the document was part of a Public Records Request processed on July 26, 2017, and bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
This document is the cover page for a deposition transcript taken on February 20, 2008, in the case of the State of Florida vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 2006 CF09454AXX). The deposition took place at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, but the name of the deponent is redacted. The document was produced by Consor & Associates Reporting and Transcription and bears a Department of Justice bates stamp number.
This document is a concordance/index page (Page 154) from a transcript produced by Consor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc. It lists keywords alphabetically from 'V' (Vanity) to 'Y' (Yep), along with their page and line numbers in the source text. Key entities listed include 'Villafona', 'Vince', 'WEISS', and the location 'Wellington'. The document bears a footer date of 07/26/17 and is associated with Public Records Request No. 17-295 and DOJ identifier DOJ-OGR-00033142.
This document is a concordance (index) page from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words starting with 'S' through 'T'—including 'Tein', 'Ted', 'testimony', and 'Swiss'—along with the specific page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The document bears a Department of Justice Office of Government Relations (DOJ-OGR) stamp and a Public Records Request number.
This document is page 145 of an index from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'lawyer' to 'lying' with corresponding page and line numbers from the transcript. It references individuals named Leopold, Lewis, and Licata, and locations including Loxahatchee.
This document is an index page (Page 141, Bates DOJ-OGR-00033129) from a legal transcript produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists alphabetical keywords from 'Duval' to 'final' with their corresponding page and line numbers in the main transcript. Significant entries include 'Epstein' (heavily referenced), 'FBI' (indicating federal investigation discussions), 'Figueroa', 'e-mail', and 'fifty-million-d...' (suggesting a large financial sum or settlement was discussed).
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a legal deposition or transcript produced by Consor & Associates. It lists words alphabetically from 'cases' to 'Country' alongside their page and line numbers in the source transcript. Key terms include 'Connolly' (referenced multiple times), 'civil', 'complaint', 'coaching', and 'CF09454AXX' (likely a case number). The document is part of a Public Records Request (No. 17-295) processed by the DOJ.
This document is page 138 of an index for a legal or official transcript, produced by the firm Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. The index lists keywords alphabetically from 'Assessment' to 'case', along with the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear in the full transcript. The footer contains the transcription company's address in West Palm Beach, FL, and a Department of Justice (DOJ) document control number.
This document is Page 137 (also labeled Page 2812) of a legal transcript index produced by Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It provides an alphabetical list of keywords starting with 'A' (e.g., 'affidavit', 'agent', 'Albritton', 'Antico', 'arrested') alongside the specific page and line numbers where these terms appear in the main transcript. The document contains redactions obscuring names or terms between 'alcohol' and 'allegations'.
This document is a blank Errata Sheet provided by Consor & Associates for a deposition taken on February 20, 2008, in the case 'State v. Jeffrey Epstein.' The name of the deponent is redacted. The form allows the witness to make corrections to their testimony under penalty of perjury; however, this specific page lists no corrections.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 131) produced by Consor & Associates. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding scheduling and professional courtesy, specifically concerning someone named Jack canceling vacation plans. The argument escalates until Mr. Tein calls Mr. Leopold selfish and abruptly terminates the deposition, with Mr. Goldberger instructing to go off the record.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, capturing a tense exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger. Mr. Goldberger is upset about a hearing that was canceled at the last minute, forcing him to disrupt a vacation, and questions the reason. Mr. Leopold denies knowing why it was canceled, speculates it relates to his own recent deposition, and offers to provide an affidavit from a Mr. Pincus to confirm his lack of knowledge.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated argument between several individuals, primarily Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of being a liar and an obstructionist, specifically claiming that Mr. Leopold lied in a letter to his co-counsel about being unavailable for a hearing.
This document is page 124 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated and adversarial exchange between several individuals, identified as Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Tein, regarding the proper procedure for copying and marking photo exhibits. The conversation is marked by frequent interruptions, personal insults, and appeals to a third party, highlighting significant conflict between the participants.
This page of a deposition transcript records the questioning of an unnamed witness regarding their distrust of their stepmother. The witness confirms they have a pending lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein but clarifies they have not received money yet. The interrogator questions the witness about whether their stepmother ever disclosed being arrested for fraud or fired from Hawthorne Aviation; the witness answers 'No' and 'Never' to these inquiries.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity