This is page 46 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Tein and defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness confirms that attorney Jeffrey Herman was the lawyer who first sued Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. The questioning turns to whether Herman advanced the witness's family any money, at which point Mr. Leopold objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Tein | Attorney |
Questioning the witness.
|
| Mr. Leopold | Attorney |
Defending attorney; makes objections regarding privilege.
|
| Witness (Unidentified 'A') | Deponent |
Answering questions regarding visits to their house and legal representation.
|
| Marie Villafona | Subject of Inquiry |
Name mentioned by Mr. Tein; witness denies knowing her.
|
| Jeffrey Sloman | Subject of Inquiry |
Person asked about regarding a visit to the witness's house; witness does not know who he is.
|
| Jeffrey Herman | Attorney |
Identified as the lawyer who first sued Epstein on the witness's behalf.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant/Subject |
Mentioned as the person sued by Jeffrey Herman on behalf of the witness.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Consor & Associates Reporting and Transcription, Inc. |
Court reporting firm handling the transcription.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where 'two ladies and two guys' visited.
|
|
|
Address listed in footer.
|
"Q. Do you know who Jeffrey Herman is? A. Yes. Q. That's the lawyer who first sued Epstein on your behalf, right? A. Yes."Source
"Q. Has Mr. Herman advanced your family any money?"Source
"MR. LEOPOLD: Any conversations that you've had with Mr. Herman regarding that issue, you are not to disclose."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,007 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document