040.pdf
141 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
4
Organizations
5
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal notice (notice of reliance)
File Size:
141 KB
Summary
This document is a 'Notice of Reliance' filed on June 19, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CIV-80469) in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team informs the court that despite the Plaintiff filing an Amended Memorandum of Law on June 12, 2009, Epstein will not file a new supplemental reply but will instead rely on his previous arguments filed on June 1, 2009. The document outlines the procedural history of the motion to dismiss and includes a certificate of service listing attorneys for both parties.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Defendant in Case No. 09-CIV-80469
|
| Jane Doe II | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in Case No. 09-CIV-80469
|
| Robert D. Critton, Jr. | Attorney |
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Florida Bar No. 224162
|
| Michael J. Pike | Attorney |
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein; Florida Bar #617296
|
| Isidro M. Garcia | Attorney |
Counsel for Plaintiff
|
| Jack Alan Goldberger | Attorney |
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of Florida |
Court where the case is filed
|
|
| Garcia Law Firm, P.A. |
Firm representing the Plaintiff
|
|
| Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. |
Firm representing the Defendant
|
|
| Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman |
Firm representing the Defendant
|
Timeline (5 events)
2009-05-09
Defendant Epstein filed Motion to Dismiss (DE 13)
US District Court Southern District of Florida
2009-05-22
Plaintiff Jane Doe II filed initial Memorandum of Law in Opposition (DE 20)
US District Court Southern District of Florida
2009-06-01
Defendant Epstein filed Reply to Plaintiff's Memorandum (DE 31)
US District Court Southern District of Florida
2009-06-12
Court Hearing where Plaintiff's counsel stated he would withdraw certain claims
US District Court Southern District of Florida
Counsel for Plaintiff
Counsel for Defendant
2009-06-12
Plaintiff filed Amended Memorandum of Law in Opposition (DE 36)
US District Court Southern District of Florida
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction
|
|
|
Location of legal firms involved
|
|
|
Address for Isidro M. Garcia
|
|
|
Address for Jack Alan Goldberger
|
|
|
Address for Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman
|
Relationships (3)
Defendant and Plaintiff in lawsuit Case 9:09-cv-80469
Signed as Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Listed as Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Key Quotes (2)
"Defendant, EPSTEIN, stands on those arguments set forth in DE 31 and, therefore, will not be filing an additional supplemental reply."Source
040.pdf
Quote #1
"After a hearing on June 12, 2009, counsel for Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, stated he would withdraw certain claims in Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s initial Memorandum of Law"Source
040.pdf
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,532 characters)
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO.: 09-CIV- 80469 – MARRA/JOHNSON
JANE DOE II,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
_________________________/
_________________________/
NOTICE OF RELIANCE ON AND INCORPORATION OF DEFENDANT’S
REPLY (DE 31) TO PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS(DE 20 & 36)
REPLY (DE 31) TO PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION
TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS(DE 20 & 36)
Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, (hereinafter “EPSTEIN”), by and through his
undersigned attorneys, hereby gives notice of his intent to rely on and incorporate hereon
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss:
undersigned attorneys, hereby gives notice of his intent to rely on and incorporate hereon
Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to
Dismiss:
1. Defendant, EPSTEIN, filed his Motion to Dismiss on May 9, 2009 (DE 13).
2. Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, filed her initial Memorandum of Law in Opposition to
Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss on May 22, 2009 (DE 20).
Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss on May 22, 2009 (DE 20).
3. Defendant, EPSTEIN, filed his Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s, Memorandum of
Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss on June 1, 2009 (DE 31).
Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss on June 1, 2009 (DE 31).
4. After a hearing on June 12, 2009, counsel for Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, stated he
would withdraw certain claims in Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s initial Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 20).
would withdraw certain claims in Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s initial Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 20).
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 2 of 3
Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
Page 2
Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
Page 2
5. Therefore, Plaintiff, Jane Doe II, filed her Amended Memorandum of Law in
Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss on June 12, 2009 (DE 36).
Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss on June 12, 2009 (DE 36).
6. Based upon the forgoing, Defendant relies on his Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s,
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 31) and
incorporates same herein by reference as if same was filed in Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s,
Amended Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss (DE
36). Accordingly, Defendant, EPSTEIN, stands on those arguments set forth in DE 31 and,
therefore, will not be filing an additional supplemental reply.
Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss (DE 31) and
incorporates same herein by reference as if same was filed in Reply to Plaintiff, Jane Doe II’s,
Amended Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Dismiss (DE
36). Accordingly, Defendant, EPSTEIN, stands on those arguments set forth in DE 31 and,
therefore, will not be filing an additional supplemental reply.
By: ______________________
ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 224162
rcrit@bclclaw.com
MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
Florida Bar #617296
mpike@bclclaw.com
ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 224162
rcrit@bclclaw.com
MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
Florida Bar #617296
mpike@bclclaw.com
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 3 of 3
Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
Page 3
Jane Doe II v. Epstein, et al.
Page 3
Certificate of Service
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing was electronically filed with
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being
served this 19th day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the
manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF
on this 19th day of June, 2009:
the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the foregoing document is being
served this 19th day on all counsel of record identified on the following service list in the
manner specified via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF
on this 19th day of June, 2009:
Isidro M. Garcia, Esq.
Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-832-7732
561-832-7137 F
isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Plaintiff
Garcia Law Firm, P.A.
224 Datura Street, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-832-7732
561-832-7137 F
isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Plaintiff
Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
561-835-8691 Fax
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Atterbury Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South
Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012
561-659-8300
561-835-8691 Fax
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Respectfully submitted,
By: ______________________
ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 224162
rcrit@bclclaw.com
MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
Florida Bar #617296
mpike@bclclaw.com
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-842-2820
Fax: 561-515-3148
(Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
ROBERT D. CRITTON, JR., ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 224162
rcrit@bclclaw.com
MICHAEL J. PIKE, ESQ.
Florida Bar #617296
mpike@bclclaw.com
BURMAN, CRITTON, LUTTIER & COLEMAN
515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561-842-2820
Fax: 561-515-3148
(Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document