court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
John Marcus McNichols
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Claus Von Bulow Appeal and Retrial | Rhode Island | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attorneys appealed Judge Colbath's ruling to the Fourth District Court of Appeals, whic... | N/A | View |
| 2021-06-30 | N/A | Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decision in Commonwealth v. Cosby vacating conviction. | Pennsylvania | View |
| 2020-06-23 | N/A | Court granted Cosby's petition for allowance of appeal. | Pennsylvania | View |
| 2009-09-22 | N/A | Videotaped Deposition of Jean Luc Bruhel | Esquire Court Reporters, On... | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017735.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal brief or memorandum submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (indicated by the Bates stamp). The text discusses legal precedents and statutes (specifically the CVRA and state laws in Utah, Oregon, South Dakota, and Texas) regarding a prosecutor's ethical obligation to inform the court of a victim's request to be heard during plea bargain proceedings. This is likely part of an argument regarding the violation of victims' rights in the context of the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693.jpg
This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 58 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the legal rights of crime victims, specifically the appointment of counsel and the right to be heard regarding a defendant's release. It cites the case *United States v. Stamper* and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The document bears the name David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or background material in a congressional investigation, likely related to the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case given Schoen's involvement as Epstein's lawyer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017656.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a 2007 Utah Law Review article, included in a legal filing by David Schoen (likely related to the House Oversight investigation). It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the ethical obligation of prosecutors to inform the court of a victim's objection to a plea deal, citing the 'Casey' case. It also proposes amendments to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.1 to protect victim contact information during alibi defense disclosures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017323.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal manuscript or book draft (possibly by Alan Dershowitz given the context of House Oversight documents) discussing the Mike Tyson rape trial. It argues that the prosecution and the accuser, Desiree Washington, suppressed evidence regarding a financial contingency fee agreement and Washington's sexual history. The text details how a Rhode Island lawyer felt ethically compelled to disclose the fee agreement despite the Indiana court ignoring it, and claims three eyewitnesses saw consensual physical affection between Tyson and Washington prior to the alleged assault.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017270.jpg
This document appears to be a page (183) from a manuscript or book draft, likely written by Alan Dershowitz, dated April 2, 2012. The text recounts the forensic defense strategies used in the O.J. Simpson trial (specifically regarding blood on a sock) and the Claus Von Bulow appeal (disproving insulin injection theories). The author frames these cases as establishing his reputation as the 'go-to' lawyer for scientific defenses, leading to a new case with an 'eerie resemblance' to the Von Bulow matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017135.jpg
This document is page 48 of a draft manuscript (dated 4.2.12), likely written by Alan Dershowitz, recounting his time as a law clerk for Chief Judge David Bazelon in Washington D.C. starting in the summer of 1962. The text describes the political atmosphere of the Warren Court era and details Bazelon's social circle, specifically weekly lunches hosted by liquor distributor Milton Kronheim attended by Supreme Court Justices and Senators. The page concludes with the beginning of a joke about Kronheim's fame.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015329.jpg
This document page, marked with a House Oversight footer, details political events from late 2010. It covers the legal battles and eventual Congressional repeal of the 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' policy involving President Obama and Judge Virginia Phillips. Additionally, it outlines Attorney General Eric Holder's opposition to California's Proposition 19 (marijuana legalization) following pressure from DEA chiefs and the Mexican government.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013433.jpg
This document is a news article from September 20, 2009, detailing various aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's legal situation and the reactions of his attorney and victims. It covers his jail time, probation, the sealing of documents, ongoing lawsuits, and the police investigation that led to charges of soliciting prostitution instead of more serious offenses.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013402.jpg
This document is page 9 of a legal motion in the case 'Edwards adv. Epstein' (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It argues that Jeffrey Epstein's claims linking Edwards to Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme were completely baseless, noting that Epstein voluntarily dismissed the claims right before a summary judgment hearing. The text asserts Edwards had no involvement in the scheme and characterizes Epstein's allegations as lacking substance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013391.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal filing arguing that defendant Bradley J. Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein based on the affirmative defense of privilege/absolute immunity. The text cites various Florida case laws regarding litigation privilege and concludes by asking the court to grant judgment in Edwards' favor on the remaining claim.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025234.jpg
This document is a strategy memo advising (implied) Jeffrey Epstein on hiring Reputation.com to scrub negative search results and manage his online image. It details the background of Reputation.com CEO Michael Fertik, outlines costs of $10k-$15k per month for 'Picasso' services, and discusses the difficulty of altering Wikipedia entries. The author explicitly suggests studying how Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton successfully sanitized their Wikipedia profiles to remove negative information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014080.jpg
This document is page 101 of a 2014 legal text (likely a law review article) discussing 'Crime Victims' Rights.' It analyzes the nuances of state statutes (Indiana, Louisiana, Idaho, Delaware) regarding when victims' rights attach, specifically debating whether rights exist before formal charges are filed. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various state codes and legal precedents. It is marked with a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was included in discovery or research related to the Epstein case, likely regarding the federal Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the non-prosecution agreement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity