Virginia
LocationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Recruiter recruit |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Acquaintance |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Perpetrator victim |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Profile Owner (iloveanirishboi)
|
Friend |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Recruiter victim |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ash
|
Friend |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Shawn
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Recruiter recruit |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Recruiter target |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Profile owner (name redacted)
|
Social |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Criminal |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Myspace User 172831
|
Social media connection |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Instructional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Visitor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Profile Owner
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GM
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant (Ms. Maxwell)
|
Recruiter recruit |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
takingbackmicrosoft (profile owner)
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Professional transactional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Facilitator |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Virginia's first encounter with Epstein, involving a massage in a bedroom. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia being 'trained' to entertain Epstein's friends. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein calling Virginia at her Palm Beach apartment to arrange for her to fly to his island. | Palm Beach apartment | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia being sent to meet men on Epstein's private island in the Caribbean or his ranch in New ... | Caribbean private island, N... | View |
| N/A | N/A | First encounter/activity with Jeffrey where narrator felt confused and submitted. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator arrives at Jeffrey's, goes to massage room where Mr. Epstein and Ms. Maxwell are waiting... | Jeffrey's residence, massag... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator massages Jeffrey's feet and legs while listening to travel plans. | Jeffrey's residence, steam ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Jeffrey offers Virginia a permanent travelling masseuse position, promising luxuries and higher pay. | Jeffrey's residence, steam ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator's mom confronts her about her activities and impending trip. | Narrator's home, bedroom/ba... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Narrator's dad drops her off at Jeffrey's mansion for the trip to NYC. | Jeffrey's mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home. | Palm Beach, FL | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia and Carolyn enter Epstein's house for approximately one hour and five minutes. | Jeffrey Epstein's home | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house. | Epstein's Palm Beach house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia visited the residence. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Virginia brought Carolyn to the residence; Defendant greeted them and instructed Virginia. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn witnessed Virginia give Epstein a sexualized massage involving sexual intercourse. | The residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting at Epstein's Manhattan mansion involving Prince Andrew, Virginia, Ghislaine Maxwell, and ... | Epstein's Manhattan mansion | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interaction between Virginia and Carolyn | Disputed: either 'a party' ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Carolyn massaging Jeffrey Epstein, sometimes with Virginia or other females present. | Unknown (likely Epstein's r... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Gathering at Virginia's house | Virginia's House | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car ride to Jeffrey Epstein's home | Car (White) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment of Virginia | Unknown (Roadside stop) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Recruitment of Carolyn | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trip to Jeffrey Epstein's house. | Jeffrey Epstein's house, Pa... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial where credible testimony and evidence was admitted. | Court | View |
019-01.pdf
This document is an affidavit filed on June 30, 2023, by John McNichols, a partner at Williams & Connolly LLP, supporting his motion to appear pro hac vice in the case of Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund v. James Dimon, et al. The case involves JPMorgan Chase & Co. as a nominal defendant and lists numerous individual defendants including James Dimon and James E. Staley. McNichols attests to his good standing with the bars of Maryland, Virginia, and D.C., and lack of criminal or disciplinary history.
014-08.pdf
This document is a declaration by FBI Special Agent Timothy R. Slater, executed in 2015, detailing his involvement in the 2006-2007 investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Slater describes locating and calling a potential victim (whose name is redacted) in early 2007 while accompanied by lead agent Nesbitt E. Kuyrkendall. During the call, the woman confirmed knowing Epstein but refused to cooperate, stating she had moved away to distance herself and wanted to leave the situation in her past.
EFTA00035375.pdf
This document is an internal email chain dated July 23, 2019, likely between Bureau of Prisons or DOJ officials. The correspondence discusses a 'confusing' memo regarding Jeffrey Epstein and requests a draft detailing his actions, current status, and plans that were 'in motion' to move him to a General Population (GP) unit. The information was intended to be forwarded to IPPA (Information, Policy, and Public Affairs) and the Director.
EFTA00032947.pdf
This document is a Law360 White Collar email newsletter from December 13, 2019. It summarizes various legal news stories, including a $30M bail for a former Braskem executive, a fraud trial involving HP and Autonomy's Mike Lynch, and charges against former NFL players for health plan fraud. The document also lists numerous law firms and companies mentioned in legal proceedings, including 'Epstein Becker Green', though there is no direct context linking this to Jeffrey Epstein's criminal cases in this specific text.
EFTA00031559.pdf
A U.S. Marshals Service Real Property Net Equity Worksheet dated August 22, 2019, assessing the value of the property at 9 East 71st Street, New York (Jeffrey Epstein's mansion). The document lists the owner as Maple, Inc., a U.S. Virgin Islands Corporation, and values the property at $81 million with a total net equity of approximately $77.5 million after estimated expenses. The assessment was conducted during the pre-seizure stage.
EFTA00020481.pdf
An FBI intake report dated August 11, 2020, documenting an online tip regarding a sexual assault alleged to have occurred in the 2000s in Virginia Beach, VA. The complainant, who was 15 at the time, describes being recruited by a man named 'Andy' to give a massage to a 'powerful man' resembling Jeffrey Epstein, which resulted in a sexual assault. The report notes that database queries returned zero results and the information was deemed to have no current lead value.
EFTA00018654.pdf
This document is a 'Law360 White Collar' email newsletter from December 5, 2018. It details various legal news stories, including Jeffrey Epstein settling a dispute with an attorney representing his victims to avoid trial testimony. Other stories cover Michael Flynn's cooperation with the Mueller investigation, the Panama Papers indictments, and various fraud and securities cases.
EFTA00018373.pdf
Defense counsel Bobbi Sternheim requests Judge Nathan to release the names of 600 potential jurors to attorneys only, prior to voir dire, to facilitate background research and ensure a fair trial. The letter cites precedent involving juror misconduct (US v. Parse) and a recent order from the Charlottesville 'Unite the Right' civil case (Sines v. Kessler) where juror names were released to counsel despite high publicity and security concerns. The document includes the cited order from the Western District of Virginia as Exhibit A.
EFTA00016268.pdf
This document is a defense expert witness disclosure letter in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated November 1, 2021. It details the qualifications and expected testimony of eight expert witnesses, covering topics such as false memory (Dr. Loftus), the lack of scientific basis for 'grooming-by-proxy' (Dr. Dietz), forensic psychiatry, prosecutorial misconduct, computer forensics, and document authentication. The defense strategy aims to challenge the reliability of memory, rebut government claims about grooming behaviors, and analyze financial and physical evidence.
EFTA00014454.pdf
This document is an email forwarding a Law360 article dated May 2, 2019. The article details Labor Secretary Alex Acosta's testimony before a House Committee, where he defended his previous actions as a U.S. Attorney regarding the lenient non-prosecution agreement granted to Jeffrey Epstein. The article notes that Judge Kenneth Marra recently ruled that Acosta violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act, though Acosta claimed he followed DOJ protocol. The report also covers Acosta's comments on labor regulations, including overtime rules and the minimum wage.
DOJ-OGR-00015246.tif
This document is a list of academic institutions, legal associations, and other organizations, along with events, grouped by year from 1974 to 1980. It appears to be a chronological record of affiliations, seminars, and conferences, potentially related to a professional's career or an institution's activities. The document also includes page numbering and a document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015246'.
DOJ-OGR-00018209.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Parkinson. The witness details his extensive law enforcement career spanning from 1966 to 2003, including time as a CSI lieutenant, training at the FBI Academy, and his transition to the Town of Palm Beach Police Department as a crime scene manager in 2003.
DOJ-OGR-00001522.jpg
This document is page 24 of 33 from a court filing (Document 62) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 6, 2020. The text outlines the court's justification for a 'partial closure' of proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic, citing legal precedent regarding public access to courts versus health safety concerns. It specifically references COVID-19 statistics in New Hampshire as of July 2, 2020, to support findings of necessity.
DOJ-OGR-00021085.jpg
This document is page 38 of a legal brief (Case 22-1426, dated Feb 28, 2023) filed in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. It contains legal arguments attempting to distance the current case from the precedent set in *U.S. v. Annabi*, arguing that *Annabi* is an outlier regarding whether a plea agreement in one district binds another. The text consists primarily of extensive footnotes citing various Second Circuit decisions (*Prisco*, *Ashraf*, *Salameh*, etc.) that limited plea agreements to specific US Attorney's Offices, supporting the government's position against the Appellant (identified by case number as Ghislaine Maxwell).
DOJ-OGR-00020999.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, filed on April 29, 2022. The Court denies the Defendant's Rule 29 motion for a judgment of acquittal, which was made at the close of the Government's case. The text outlines the legal standard for such a motion, citing numerous precedents that require the court to view evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00018735.jpg
This document is page 137 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding her social circle in approximately 2002. The testimony establishes that Carolyn was friends with Virginia Roberts, whom she met through her then-boyfriend Sean, and that the group (including a man named Tony who lived with Virginia) frequently socialized at Tony and Virginia's apartment, consuming alcohol and marijuana.
DOJ-OGR-00030577.jpg
This document is page 110 of a 131-page index for a legal transcript, created by J. Consor & Associates on July 26, 2017. It lists keywords and numbers (from 'thought' to '9') mentioned in the transcript, along with the corresponding page and line numbers where they appear. The document is marked with Public Records Request No. 17-295 and DOJ control number DOJ-OGR-00030577.
DOJ-OGR-00021842.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing that critiques the reasoning of a prior court decision, 'Annabi'. The author argues that 'Annabi' departed from the established legal doctrine that a plea agreement with a specific U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) only binds that office, not the entire U.S. government, unless explicitly stated otherwise. The text cites numerous other cases in its footnotes to support this traditional, more limited interpretation of such agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00021684.jpg
Page 24 (PDF page 37) of a legal brief in Case 22-1426 (United States v. Maxwell appeal). The text argues against Maxwell's claim that Eleventh Circuit law should apply to the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), asserting that the court should follow its own precedents (Annabi) and that the governing law is that of the forum state. It cites multiple cases to support the application of local circuit law over the law where a plea agreement was originally negotiated.
DOJ-OGR-00019225.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing dated July 2, 2020, which outlines the court's findings for partially closing a proceeding. The court justifies this closure by citing the substantial interest in protecting public health and safety from the spread of COVID-19, referencing the 5,802 confirmed cases and 373 deaths in New Hampshire since the pandemic began.
DOJ-OGR-00019195.jpg
This is page 3 of a court filing (Document 2) from July 2, 2020, associated with Case 1:20-mj-00132-AJ (The United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document justifies a 'partial closure' of court proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic, citing New Hampshire health statistics and legal precedents regarding public access to courts.
DOJ-OGR-00016784.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Richards. Richards, an FBI agent, testifies that their career began in 2003, they trained at the FBI academy in Quantico, Virginia, and they have been stationed at the Fort Pierce resident agency of the Miami division since 2014.
DOJ-OGR-00010757.jpg
This legal document, filed on June 29, 2022, argues for the immediate unsealing of a defendant's motion for a new trial and related documents, such as juror questionnaires. The argument is based on the First Amendment right of public access to court proceedings, which is asserted to be particularly strong when allegations of juror misconduct are involved. The document contends that the public interest in transparency is significant, especially in a high-profile case, and that no sufficient justification for sealing the documents has been provided.
DOJ-OGR-00010569.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that a defendant's actions satisfy the requirements for a 'covered sex crime' under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. The prosecution asserts that the defendant engaged in a pattern of prohibited sexual conduct, including transporting victims (Jane) and non-consensual touching (Jane and Carolyn), justifying a sentencing enhancement. The document refutes the defendant's claim that the guideline is inapplicable, citing case law and the original congressional intent to ensure lengthy incarceration for such offenders.
DOJ-OGR-00032935.jpg
This document contains photocopies of blank banking stationery belonging to Janusz and Beata Banasiak. It includes a transaction register cover, a blank check, and a blank deposit ticket for an account at BB&T in Charlottesville, Virginia. The account holders' address is listed in Germantown, Maryland. The document dates '04/95' and '1/2001' appear as printing or account codes.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity