Taylor
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
U.S.
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
Illinois
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicholas [Redacted]
|
Source investigator to official |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Rusty Shackleford
|
Investigator to source material |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-01 | Court case | U.S. v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022) | U.S. Supreme Court | View |
| 2012-07-02 | Legal ruling | The case Fierro v. Taylor was decided in the Southern District of New York. | SDNY | View |
| 2012-07-02 | Court ruling | A ruling in the case Fierro v. Taylor was made by the SDNY court. | SDNY | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Taylor v. United States case, 495 U.S. 575, 600 | N/A | View |
| 1990-01-01 | Legal case | The case of *Taylor v. United States*, 495 U.S. 575, 602 (1990) is cited as an example of courts ... | N/A | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Court decision | The Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of Taylor v. Illinois, which involved the exclusi... | Illinois | View |
| 1988-01-01 | Court case | Citation to Taylor v. Illinois, 484 U.S. 400 (1988). | N/A | View |
| 1975-01-01 | Legal decision | The case of Taylor v. Louisiana was decided. | Louisiana | View |
| 0006-09-01 | N/A | Flight from PBI to TEB | PBI to TEB | View |
DOJ-OGR-00005602.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that precluding certain statements is the only appropriate remedy for a discovery violation. It cites Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(d)(2)(C) and legal precedents, including the Supreme Court's decision in *Taylor v. Illinois*, to establish that a court has the discretion to impose such a sanction. The argument rests on balancing a defendant's rights against public interests like the integrity of the trial process and the fair administration of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00005597.jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing (Document 384) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists the legal precedents cited in the main document, including six court cases and three federal rules of procedure and evidence. The cases cited involve parties such as Taylor, Campagnuolo, Katz, Tellier, Tracy, and Wicker against the United States or the state of Illinois.
DOJ-OGR-00002826.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (filed March 24, 2021) outlining 'Applicable Law' under the Sixth Amendment regarding jury selection. It details the requirements for establishing a 'fair cross-section' of the community in a jury pool, citing precedents such as *Taylor v. Louisiana* and *Duren v. Missouri*. The footer indicates this document was processed by the Department of Justice (DOJ-OGR).
Re: SDNY raid on Little Saint James
Detailed report on the illegality of the LSJ Ambulance (lack of registration/certification), potential smuggling, and questions about the raid.
Re: SDNY raid on Little Saint James
Declining to comment but inviting Taylor to forward information.
SDNY raid on Little Saint James
Requesting press release on LSJ raid and offering info on the ambulance.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity