| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pretrial Services
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Evidence transfer | The Palm Beach Police allegedly turned over all seized material to the United States Attorney pur... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of Indictment | SDNY | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Investigation | The United States Attorney in this District opened an investigation into Epstein and his co-consp... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
This document is an email dated April 8, 2021, sent by an Associate U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. The email circulates excerpts from the 'Epstein OPR report' detailing the Office of Professional Responsibility's framework for analyzing attorney misconduct, as well as sections from the Justice Manual regarding the authority and procedures of the Professional Misconduct Review Unit (PMRU).
An email chain between redacted USANYS officials from February 11, 2021, discussing media inquiries (specifically from Bloomberg) regarding a Law360 article titled '3 Names To Watch As Biden Mulls Next SDNY Top Prosecutor'. The forwarded article discusses potential successors to U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, explicitly mentioning her office's prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell as a significant recent high-profile case. The article profiles candidates Damian Williams, Katherine Goldstein, and Anjan Sahni.
This document is an email dated October 22, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to colleagues at USANYS. The email attaches a draft response to a 'Daubert motion' (relating to expert witness testimony admissibility) and discusses the timeline for submitting additional motions in tranches. The context suggests this corresponds to the preparation for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.
This document is an email chain between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris. The correspondence spans from July 2020 to December 2020 and concerns the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically addressing her renewed bail application and legal questions regarding the extradition of dual US/French citizens from France.
This document is an email dated December 13, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The subject is 'Extradition' and it includes an attachment titled 'Bail_Section_(Extradition).docx', with a message inviting the recipient to edit the document. This likely relates to legal proceedings (possibly Ghislaine Maxwell, given the date and context of SDNY involvement) regarding bail and extradition.
An email dated September 6, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a colleague. The sender requests coverage for three meetings with 'Berman' (likely U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman) because they must travel to California from September 17-19 regarding the 'Epstein case'.
This document is an email chain from July 2, 2020, between the Chief of the Criminal Division at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and a recipient named 'Ed'. The correspondence confirms the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell in New Hampshire on charges of facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's abuse of minors. It discusses procedural details, including that her presentment will not be in SDNY that day and that any appeal on the bail argument would go to Judge Nathan.
This document is an internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated February 21, 2019. It was sent by a Special Assistant/Contractor to Geoffrey Berman and others, alerting them to a 'New Epstein Ruling' by sharing a link to a Miami Herald article. The email likely pertains to the federal judge's ruling declaring the 2008 non-prosecution agreement illegal.
This document is a series of emails between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI/NYPD Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding the discovery process for the Ghislaine Maxwell case in August 2020. The correspondence details requests for specific evidence, including Grand Jury transcripts, search warrant returns (NH premises), FBI Sentinel files, and scans of message pads (both with and without post-it notes). The FBI agent confirms the availability of files from New York, Virgin Islands, and Florida, and discusses the logistical challenge of filtering out nude/semi-nude images from seized digital devices before turning them over to the defense.
This document is an email chain from July 28 to August 3, 2020, between SDNY prosecutors (including an AUSA and Alison) and UK defense attorneys from Blackfords LLP (Gary Bloxsome, Jennifer Richardson). The correspondence negotiates the terms of a voluntary interview for a Blackfords client (unnamed in text, but contextually relevant to Prince Andrew) in connection with 'US v Maxwell'. Key topics include protections against evidence use outside the Maxwell case, immunity comparable to MLAT proceedings, elements of 18 U.S.C. 1001 (False Statements), and the extension of a 'Negotiation Period' to August 10, 2020.
This document is an internal email from the Chief of the Criminal Division at the SDNY US Attorney's Office outlining the schedule for the week of July 1, 2019. It notably lists 'Epstein indictment (PC)' as a schedule item for Tuesday, July 2, 2019, preceding Jeffrey Epstein's arrest on July 6, 2019. The schedule also details other legal proceedings, including the Ahuja trial, Ernesto Lopez sentencing, and various internal briefings.
This document is an email chain from October and November 2020 between Crowell & Moring LLP attorneys (representing a redacted witness) and the SDNY US Attorney's Office. The correspondence coordinates a second proffer interview for the witness, scheduled for November 12, 2020, which will include FBI agents. The focus of the interview is specifically on the witness's knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in the Virgin Islands, including whether CBP employees helped Epstein avoid standard entry processing and if Epstein provided favors (such as trips to his island) to CBP staff. A specific CBP employee in St. Thomas is mentioned as having the witness listed in their phone contacts.
This document is an email chain ranging from January 2019 to October 2020 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the FBI's Information Management Division (IMD). The correspondence concerns the logistics of the Epstein investigation discovery process, specifically tracking the scanning and transmission of approximately 29,000 pages of records. Key topics include the handling of CDs found in 'boxes of materials from Florida' and coordination between the agencies to ensure a complete set of materials was received.
This document is an internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York containing notes from a call on January 17, 2020. The notes discuss an Inspector General (IG) investigation into whether there was a policy violation in not providing Jeffrey Epstein with a cellmate. Key points include the IG's access to Grand Jury materials under the 2016 Empowerment Act, the SDNY office's desire to delay the IG report until after an upcoming trial, and discussions on whether to anonymize MCC employees and witnesses in the final report.
This document is an email chain from July 1, 2019, involving the United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). A redacted official discusses a scheduling conflict involving a cardiologist appointment, a 'GSA meeting,' and an 'Epstein meeting.' This correspondence occurred just days before Jeffrey Epstein was arrested by federal agents on July 6, 2019.
This document is an internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York, dated October 27, 2021. The sender is asking a colleague to 'citecheck' a portion of a legal brief attached as 'Govt_Reply_v2.docx'. The document relates to legal preparations, likely in connection with the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timeframe and context of SDNY prosecutions.
This is an Opinion & Order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated August 11, 2025, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer denies the government's motion to unseal grand jury transcripts from Maxwell's case. The document provides background, referencing Maxwell's December 2021 conviction for sexual abuse committed with Jeffrey Epstein and the 2019 indictment and arrest of Epstein.
This legal document is a court opinion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. Maxwell argued that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) immunized her from prosecution. The court rejected her argument, holding that the NPA made with the USAO-SDFL does not legally bind the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting her.
This is the final page of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York, dated December 19, 2021. The letter, submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and his assistants, informs the Court of the submission of exhibits GX 603-A and GX 604-A under a temporary seal. It also states that copies of other referenced exhibits will be provided the following morning.
This document is the signature page of a legal filing from the office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, filed on December 21, 2021. The document is submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorney Maurene Comey, along with three other Assistant U.S. Attorneys. A copy was also sent to the Defense Counsel via the court's electronic filing system.
This legal document is a filing from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, arguing against a defense position regarding witness availability. The prosecution cites the precedent of *United States v. Jones*, where a judge rejected a similar defense attempt to compel the government to immunize a witness. The filing concludes that since the defense had the opportunity to call numerous witnesses, including Virginia Roberts, there is no reason to deviate from the standard jury instruction on the equal availability of witnesses.
This legal letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated December 14, 2021, opposes defendant Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call three attorneys for victims (Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman) to testify. The Government argues that their testimony about privileged client conversations or discussions with the Government would be irrelevant and an improper attempt to circumvent privilege, as the victims themselves have already testified.
This court order, dated December 2, 2020, addresses the individualized detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell, noting concerns about the lack of redress for serious conditions. It directs Warden Tellez to provide a first-hand accounting to the Court and counsel regarding these conditions. Additionally, MDC legal counsel is ordered to submit a letter to the Court by December 4, 2020, for review to determine if further information is needed.
This legal document is a filing by the U.S. Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, requesting an extension for producing approximately 1.2 million documents seized from Epstein's residences. The Government asks to move the deadline to November 23, 2020, and to extend the motions schedule. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants the request in an order dated November 9, 2020, setting new deadlines for motions into early 2021.
This legal document, dated November 6, 2020, details a negotiation between defense counsel and the Government regarding an extension in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The defense proposed four conditions for an extension, including extending motion deadlines and providing discovery materials and victim names. The Government agreed to only two of the conditions, resulting in an inability to reach an agreement on the requested two-week extension for production. The document is certified by Assistant United States Attorney Maurene Comey.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity