UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pretrial Services
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Evidence transfer | The Palm Beach Police allegedly turned over all seized material to the United States Attorney pur... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of Indictment | SDNY | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Investigation | The United States Attorney in this District opened an investigation into Epstein and his co-consp... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019338.jpg
This legal document, dated August 21, 2020, is a submission from the Acting United States Attorney and Assistant United States Attorneys to Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It argues against the defendant's application to use criminal discovery materials in civil cases, asserting that the application lacks legal justification, attempts to circumvent a protective order, and is irrelevant to the civil litigation. The document suggests the defendant's intent is to falsely accuse the Government and another party.
DOJ-OGR-00003022.jpg
This legal document, filed by the prosecution, refutes the defendant's (Maxwell's) motion which alleges collusion between the law firm Boies Schiller and the U.S. Government. The prosecution argues that the defendant's narrative is false, stating that the perjury investigation began in late 2018, years after the meetings between Boies Schiller and a former AUSA, and that this AUSA had no involvement in the decision to open the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00004698.jpg
This document is a legal declaration by A. Marie Villafaña, an Assistant United States Attorney, filed on July 9, 2008, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Villafaña outlines her professional background, including her 1993 graduation from Berkeley Law, her bar admissions in Florida, California, and Minnesota, and her past work as a judicial clerk. The declaration establishes her credentials and her employment as an AUSA during the events relevant to the case involving petitioner Jane Doe.
DOJ-OGR-00004628.jpg
This document is page two of a legal agreement outlining the deferral of federal prosecution against Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. Under the authority of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, the federal case will be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided Epstein adheres to the agreement's conditions. The text also specifies the procedures for initiating federal prosecution should Epstein violate the terms.
DOJ-OGR-00002728.jpg
This legal document, filed by the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, details the security and search procedures for a specific defendant at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). It outlines daily pat-down and cell searches, weekly body scans, and frequent nightly wellness checks, justifying them as necessary for the safety of the institution and the defendant. The document also notes a recent change to reduce searches by relocating the defendant's video conferences with her counsel to within her unit.
DOJ-OGR-00005624.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, is a letter from the United States Attorney's office regarding the admissibility of evidence in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It states that certain evidence is admissible as direct evidence of the crimes charged, negating the need for an in limine motion, and notes that the letter itself is designated as "confidential" under a July 31, 2020 Protective Order.
DOJ-OGR-00005542.jpg
This document is the signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It was signed on October 29, 2007, by Epstein's counsel, Gerald Lefcourt, and on October 30, 2007, by Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana on behalf of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. The text confirms that Epstein has read, understood, and agrees to comply with the clarifications in the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00005771.jpg
This legal document, page 6 of a court filing from October 29, 2021, argues against the government's use of the term "victim" to refer to accusers in a trial. It cites numerous legal precedents from various state and federal courts to support the position that such language is improper and prejudicial, especially when the commission of a crime is in dispute. The document concludes by emphasizing the special role of a prosecutor to act impartially and seek justice, rather than simply to secure a conviction.
DOJ-OGR-00005730.jpg
This document details an ongoing investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on investigative measures taken by police officers, including subpoenas and a search warrant at Epstein's residence. It describes the involvement of several redacted individuals, one of whom was introduced to Epstein, performed a massage, and recruited other girls at his request, later cooperating with police for a lesser charge. The document also clarifies Ms. Maxwell's non-involvement with purported victims and her absence during the search warrant execution, with seized materials being turned over to the United States Attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00002906.jpg
This document is the final page of a court filing (Document 196) in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 6, 2021. Submitted by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, it concludes a submission to the court by stating the Government's willingness to provide further information and is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys on behalf of U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity