UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional employment |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pretrial Services
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. NATHAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Evidence transfer | The Palm Beach Police allegedly turned over all seized material to the United States Attorney pur... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-02 | N/A | Unsealing of Indictment | SDNY | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Investigation | The United States Attorney in this District opened an investigation into Epstein and his co-consp... | SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001740.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020. The Government respectfully requests that the Court schedule a date approximately 180 days in the future for them to provide an update on their position regarding the sealing of documents in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The filing is submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and her assistants Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00001723.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 13, 2020, is a response from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to a defendant's requests regarding housing and access to discovery. The prosecution argues that the defendant's application is moot because the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has already granted the defendant extensive daily access to discovery materials from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The document concludes by requesting that the defendant's application be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001684.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the second page of a declaration by Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller. It outlines a disagreement between the U.S. Government and the defense regarding proposed restrictions on the public identification of victims and witnesses in the case. The document specifies the conflicting paragraphs in the proposed orders from both sides and references an accompanying letter for the Government's full reasoning.
DOJ-OGR-00001670.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the U.S. Government's response to a defendant's motion in a criminal case. The Government argues against the defendant's attempt to restrict its use of gathered materials and to impose restrictions on third parties, calling the request unprecedented and without legal basis. The filing, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to Judge Alison J. Nathan, urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and implement the Government's own proposed protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00001496.jpg
This document is the conclusion of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's office, dated July 2, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The government argues that the defendant is an extreme flight risk and that no conditions of bail would ensure their presence in court. Citing several legal precedents, the filing respectfully requests that the defendant's application for bail be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001463.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 23 of 24) of a legal filing submitted on May 27, 2021, in Case 21-770. The document, signed by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of the Southern District of New York prosecution team (including Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach), argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's motion should be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001346.jpg
This legal document, filed by the Acting U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, addresses the court regarding the stringent and individualized detention conditions of a detainee, Ms. Maxwell. The filing notes that a previous letter of complaint received no meaningful response and suggests that the facility's warden, Warden Tellez, should be directed to provide a first-hand explanation to the court for these specialized conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00001341.jpg
This is the conclusion page (page 24) of a legal filing dated April 12, 2021, submitted by the Southern District of New York (Assistant US Attorneys Pomerantz, Comey, and Moe). The document argues that Judge Nathan acted correctly in denying Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for temporary release and concludes that the motion should remain denied.
DOJ-OGR-00000638.jpg
This legal document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on August 29, 2019, which formally dismisses the criminal case against defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, follows a recommendation and directive from the U.S. Attorney's office to file a nolle prosequi. The judge's order also references a hearing held on August 27, 2019, and the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
DOJ-OGR-00000545.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, from case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB. A speaker, Mr. Weinberg, argues to the court that the immense publicity surrounding Mr. Epstein, combined with his wealth, makes him an attractive target for both civil and criminal complaints. Weinberg contends that this unprecedented level of attention would motivate any individuals victimized by Epstein after 2005 to come forward.
DOJ-OGR-00000519.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019, concerning a bail proceeding for Mr. Epstein. The speaker discusses the government's arguments for detention, citing a recent search of Epstein's home on the Upper East Side and his arrest. The key point is the government's allegation of witness tampering, supported by evidence of two large payments ($250,000 and $100,000) made to Epstein's associates shortly after a Miami Herald story was published about the case and the role of former U.S. Attorney Mr. Acosta.
DOJ-OGR-00000319.jpg
This document is the signature page of a legal filing submitted on July 9, 2010, by the office of the United States Attorney. It lists Wifredo A. Ferrer as the U.S. Attorney and Dexter A. Lee, Eduardo I. Sánchez, and A. Marie Villafaña as Assistant U.S. Attorneys representing the respondent, providing their contact information and Florida Bar numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00021083.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated February 28, 2023, presents a series of case law citations to support the legal argument that a plea agreement made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) binds the entire United States government. The cited cases establish that the U.S. government is considered a single entity across all districts, and therefore, an agreement made by one of its attorneys in one location (e.g., West Virginia) is enforceable against federal prosecutors in another (e.g., South Dakota).
DOJ-OGR-00020808.jpg
This document is a signature page for an addendum to a Non-Prosecution Agreement concerning Jeffrey Epstein. It confirms Epstein's understanding and agreement to the terms. The document is signed on October 29, 2007, by Lilly Ann Sanchez, an attorney for Epstein, and on October 30, 2007, by a representative for the U.S. Attorney's office.
DOJ-OGR-00020802.jpg
This document is the signature page of a Non-Prosecution Agreement, dated September 24, 2007. It is signed by Jeffrey Epstein and Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña, on behalf of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, and also lists Epstein's attorneys, Gerald Lefcourt and Lilly Ann Sanchez. By signing, Epstein affirms that he has read, understood, and agrees to comply with the conditions of the agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00001809.jpg
This document is Page 5 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the Government is failing to meet discovery obligations, specifically regarding 28 boxes of material from Florida and files from Georgia, and that the proposed timeline impairs Maxwell's ability to prepare for the July 2021 trial. The text highlights concerns about witness statements, the age of the claims (26 years), and the difficulty of securing out-of-country testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00022123.jpg
This legal document, filed on May 21, 2021, is a submission from the United States Attorney's office to the Court, signed by Assistant United States Attorneys Jessica Lonergan and Nicolas Roos. It addresses the scheduling of a court proceeding, stating that if the proposed date is inconvenient or if an in-person proceeding is desired, the parties can propose alternative dates. Copies were sent to Defense Counsel and Pretrial Services.
DOJ-OGR-00022096.jpg
This is the concluding page of a legal document filed on April 24, 2020, by the office of United States Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman. The document argues that the defendant Thomas's motion to compel discovery for a selective prosecution defense should be denied because the defendant failed to meet the required 'rigorous standard'. The filing cites several legal precedents to support the argument that courts routinely prevent defendants from questioning the government's motives for prosecution at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021856.jpg
This legal document is a court opinion regarding an appeal by Maxwell. The court affirms a lower District Court's decision, ruling that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) does not prevent the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY) from prosecuting Maxwell. The court holds that such agreements are generally limited to the specific district in which they are made.
DOJ-OGR-00021841.jpg
This page from a legal filing argues that plea agreements made by any U.S. Attorney are binding on the entire U.S. government across all federal districts. It cites several court cases establishing this principle and the related rule that any ambiguities in such agreements must be interpreted against the government. The document concludes by stating that a case named Annabi contradicts this established legal precedent.
DOJ-OGR-00021838.jpg
This legal document analyzes court precedent regarding whether a plea agreement in one federal district binds prosecutors in another. It argues that the 'Annabi rule' has been sharply criticized and was based on a misreading of prior cases from the Second Circuit, specifically Abbamonte, Alessi, and Papa. The document suggests that the precedent set by these earlier cases does not support the broad interpretation applied in Annabi.
DOJ-OGR-00021803.jpg
This document is a page from a court opinion regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. The court addresses Maxwell's argument that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL) immunized her from prosecution. The court rejects this claim, holding that the NPA made by the Florida office does not legally bind the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USAO-SDNY), which brought the charges against her.
DOJ-OGR-00021327.jpg
This legal document outlines the Department of Justice's policy regarding the deportation of criminal aliens, referencing a 1995 memorandum from the Attorney General that directs federal prosecutors to seek deportation unless extraordinary circumstances exist. It also discusses the legal concept of prosecutorial discretion, citing the 1978 Supreme Court case Bordenkircher v. Hayes, and provides legal definitions for terms like 'criminal alien' and offenses leading to deportation.
DOJ-OGR-00021258.jpg
This document contains a letter dated August 3, 2007, from Matthew Menchel of the U.S. Attorney's Office to Lilly Ann Sanchez, counsel for Mr. Epstein. The letter presents a non-negotiable two-year incarceration plea offer with an August 17 deadline. Accompanying text explains Menchel's rationale for the offer and its firm deadline to the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), and notes that the letter was sent on Menchel's last day at the USAO, a timing he described as a 'total coincidence'.
DOJ-OGR-00021169.jpg
This is a legal document filed on April 26, 2023, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew A. Rohrbach on behalf of U.S. Attorney Damian Williams. The filing notes an extension of the deadline for 'Maxwell' to file her reply brief to July 27, 2023. Rohrbach affirms the truthfulness of the document's contents under penalty of perjury.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity