District Court
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Assignment of civil case caption 9:08-CV-80736. | District Court | View |
| 2006-10-06 | N/A | Grand Jury subpoena issued by US District Court, Southern District of Florida | Southern District of Florida | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008445.jpg
This document is page 2 of 4 from a court filing (Document 559) dated December 19, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It consists of a list of Government Exhibit (GX) identifiers, ranging from GX-2-H-R to GX-3-R-R. The suffix '-R' likely indicates these are redacted versions of the exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00008375.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 545) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on December 15, 2021. The text argues against a motion by the defendant to compel victims' attorneys to testify, citing Federal Rules of Evidence 402 and 403 and the sanctity of the attorney-client privilege. The argument emphasizes that forcing counsel to testify against their clients, particularly victims of sexual abuse, is legally disfavored and damaging to the attorney-client relationship.
DOJ-OGR-00001522.jpg
This document is page 24 of 33 from a court filing (Document 62) in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on July 6, 2020. The text outlines the court's justification for a 'partial closure' of proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic, citing legal precedent regarding public access to courts versus health safety concerns. It specifically references COVID-19 statistics in New Hampshire as of July 2, 2020, to support findings of necessity.
DOJ-OGR-00000928.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues for the temporary release of a defendant (likely Ghislaine Maxwell, based on the case number context) by citing legal precedents established during the COVID-19 pandemic. It references *United States v. Clark* and *United States v. Robertson* to establish that courts have granted release under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(i) when incarceration impedes the defendant's ability to prepare their defense. A footnote notes that the 10th Circuit stayed the release order in the *Robertson* case pending appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00000822.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York detailing the initial legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein in July 2019. It covers the filing of the sealed indictment on July 2, his arrest on July 6, and the unsealing of the indictment, initial appearance, arraignment (pleading Not Guilty), and status conference on July 8. The document lists the legal teams for both the prosecution (US Attorney's Office) and the defense, as well as the judges assigned to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00000773.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing in the case regarding Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490), dated August 5, 2025. It argues for strict adherence to grand jury secrecy rules (Rule 6(e)) to protect the privacy of victims, many of whom were minors at the time of abuse. The filing outlines specific requested relief, including requiring the government to confer with victims' counsel, conducting judicial in camera reviews of materials, and allowing victims' counsel to review proposed redactions prior to any public release to prevent re-identification.
DOJ-OGR-00000771.jpg
A legal letter dated August 5, 2025 (Document 73), from the Edwards Henderson law firm to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. The firm, representing numerous Epstein survivors, writes to address the DOJ's request to unseal grand jury materials, urging the court to protect victims' rights and privacy under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA). The document is 'Memo Endorsed' and signed by Judge Berman.
DOJ-OGR-00000447.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 24) from July 16, 2019, addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490). The text argues for the defendant's right to bail, contending that denying bail based on wealth violates the Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. It cites specific case law (Brinson, Afyare, Gardner) to argue that the presumption against release in § 1591 prosecutions is rebuttable.
DOJ-OGR-00000321.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing dated July 11, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). In this motion, Epstein, through his attorneys Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich, requests permission from the court to file his supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The document lists the contact information for the three defense attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00020963.jpg
This page is from a court order (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on April 1, 2022, addressing arguments by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) regarding Juror 50. The Court analyzes Juror 50's failure to disclose sexual abuse by a stepbrother on his jury questionnaire (Questions 48 and 49). The Court finds Juror 50's explanation—that he skimmed the questionnaire and did not consider his abuser to be 'family' at the time—to be credible and not an act of deliberate concealment.
DOJ-OGR-00020954.jpg
This document is page 11 of a court order filed on April 1, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the Court's assessment of 'Juror 50,' who failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse during voir dire; the juror testified that this history did not affect his impartiality. The document also notes the denial of a defense request to stay the ruling pending the release of a documentary featuring said juror.
DOJ-OGR-00020937.jpg
This document is a page from a jury questionnaire filled out by Juror ID 50 for Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror answers 'No' to Question 49 regarding whether they or a family member have ever been accused of sexual harassment or assault, and 'No' to Question 50 regarding any other experiences affecting impartiality. The document was filed on March 9, 2022, and later included in an appellate record on February 28, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00020869.jpg
This document is a court exhibit (A-243) containing an excerpt from an article in The Independent. It features an interview with Scotty David, a juror in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, who discusses why the jury found the victims credible and the verdict justified. David reveals his own history as a sexual abuse survivor, explaining how his personal experience helped him understand how victims process traumatic memories.
DOJ-OGR-00020852.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated December 27, 2021, during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that the jury appears to be considering convicting Maxwell on Count Four based on events in New Mexico involving a victim named 'Jane,' whereas the indictment specified events in New York. The defense contends that allowing a conviction based on the New Mexico evidence would constitute a 'constructive amendment' or 'substantial variance' from the indictment, which would be a reversible legal error.
DOJ-OGR-00020807.jpg
This document is a signature page for an Addendum to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It contains a statement certifying that Epstein understands the clarifications to the NPA and agrees to comply. The document is signed by Gerald Lefcourt (Epstein's counsel) on October 29, 2007, and by a representative of the U.S. Attorney's Office (marked FAUSA) on October 30, 2007.
DOJ-OGR-00020495.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket covering proceedings between July 7 and July 9, 2020, regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It records the official appearances of Maxwell's defense team (Cohen, Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca), the filing of a superseding indictment, and orders regarding speedy trial exclusions and victim rights. It also schedules a remote arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, providing public access dial-in numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00018945.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument regarding the admissibility of 'message books' containing caller names, dates, times, and callback numbers intended for the defendant and Mr. Epstein. The Court overrules an objection, citing Federal Rule of Evidence 803.6 (Business Records), stating that witnesses Alessi and Hesse provided sufficient foundation that these were regular records rather than miscellaneous jottings.
DOJ-OGR-00018592.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues against admitting a topless photograph of a female subject found in Jeffrey Epstein's possession in 2019, stating the photo dates to 2002 when the subject was of age. Menninger argues that introducing the photo creates a '403 problem' (prejudice) because the prosecution will not call the subject to testify due to her 'credibility problems.'
DOJ-OGR-00016183.jpg
This is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The dialogue involves defense attorney Mr. Everdell, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and the Judge discussing procedural matters, including jury instructions for binders and the display of exhibits. The Judge also sets the upcoming trial schedule for the weeks of Christmas and New Year's, establishing daily start times (9:30 AM) and counsel meetings (8:45 AM).
DOJ-OGR-00015651.jpg
A photographic exhibit (Government Exhibit 333) from the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial showing Epstein and Maxwell seated together in front of a donor wall, likely at a cultural institution in New York City. The image depicts them in a casual, intimate setting, smiling at one another. The document includes DOJ identification numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00015613.jpg
Government Exhibit 283 from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The image depicts a dimly lit interior room, likely a bathroom or treatment room inside one of Jeffrey Epstein's residences (probably Palm Beach). The room features marble walls, a desk with a telephone and a model airplane, a framed portrait on the wall, and a dental or massage chair equipped with medical lighting and tools in the background.
DOJ-OGR-00015612.jpg
This document is a government exhibit photograph (Exhibit 282-R) from the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 20 Cr. 330). It depicts a wall with nine framed items. Eight of the frames are completely redacted. The central frame contains a handwritten poster with a drawing of two figures and the Star Trek quote 'Live Long AND PROSPER' signed 'SPOCK'.
DOJ-OGR-00002438.jpg
This document is a placeholder page for 'Exhibit B' filed in the court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) on February 4, 2021. The actual contents of the exhibit are not visible as they were filed under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00002387(1).jpg
This document is page 4 (filed as page 5 of 18) of a Protective Order from civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell). It outlines the legal protocols for designating documents and depositions as 'CONFIDENTIAL' during the discovery process to prevent privacy harm.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity