This document contains an email chain between USANYS employees regarding a 'Sharing Order Part II' related to the Epstein case. The correspondence, dating from January 2020 to June 2020, discusses the procedural details of sharing additional trust and will documents (specifically 'Trust Two' and '2019 Trust') with the Civil Division. Key details include a reference to a prior miscellaneous court number (19 Misc. 0586) and a Rule 6(e) order.
This document is an automatic email reply dated December 30, 2019, from an individual at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The subject line indicates the email is in response to a 'plaintiff counsel request for documents' related to the Epstein case. The body of the email states the sender is out of the office until Tuesday.
This document is an email thread from February 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS/SDNY) and the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) at the Department of Justice. The correspondence coordinates points of contact (POCs) for the Epstein case, specifically identifying an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA) at SDNY as the contact person and introducing the primary attorneys handling the OPR matter. The names of the officials involved are redacted.
This document is an electronic calendar entry for a meeting titled 'Epstein-related Touhy request' scheduled for May 18, 2020. The meeting was organized by an individual from the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) and included one redacted attendee. A Touhy request typically refers to the legal process for obtaining testimony or records from federal employees for litigation.
This document is an automatic email reply dated December 3, 2019, from an Assistant United States Attorney (AUSA). The subject line references 'Tartaglione / Epstein', linking the two individuals (likely Nicholas Tartaglione and Jeffrey Epstein) in the context of a legal matter. The sender notes they are away on business travel until December 5, 2019.
An email dated October 20, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) to a redacted recipient (likely at the MDC). The email coordinates the delivery of a hard drive containing new discovery materials for Ghislaine Maxwell via FedEx and requests confirmation upon delivery to the defendant.
An email chain between USANYS officials dated June 26, 2020, discussing the legal strategy for the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment. The prosecutors debate whether the current language is sufficient to prove the 'interstate travel component' of the charges and whether to include a specific (redacted) name in the indictment.
This document is an email thread among US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff regarding a court order from Judge Engelmayer in the case of United States v. Justin Rivera. The Judge required the BOP to explain why Ghislaine Maxwell (detained at MDC) received significantly better access to legal counsel and laptops than Rivera (detained at MCC), specifically citing 'terrible optics' and potential disparity based on class/race. The emails detail the drafting of a declaration to explain that the differences are due to Maxwell's protective custody status and the sheer volume of discovery in her case, compared to Rivera's placement in the general population.
This document is an email record from Geoffrey Berman (US Attorney for SDNY) dated May 1, 2020, sending an attachment titled '2020-04-10 GM prosecution memo..pdf' to a redacted colleague. The attachment title suggests it is a legal memorandum regarding the prosecution of 'GM' (likely Ghislaine Maxwell), dated April 10, 2020, shortly before her arrest.
An email dated February 3, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a colleague. The email forwards an attachment titled '2020.10.07,_Maxwell,_Prosecution_Teams_Letter.pdf' regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's prosecution teams.
This document is an internal email from the Chief of the Criminal Division at the SDNY, dated July 1, 2020 (one day before Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest). It informs colleagues that NBC contacted the FBI press office regarding rumors of 'movement' in the Epstein investigation, specifically mentioning 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) and Prince Andrew. The FBI declined to comment and directed inquiries to the New York office.
This document is an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated June 29, 2020, discussing legal procedures related to the Epstein case. The prosecutors discuss the need for a new court order to disclose additional trust agreements to the Civil division, citing privacy concerns and the potential need to notify the individuals who provided the agreements. The chain references a previous 6(e) order from February and includes an attachment of a signed disclosure order.
This document is an email header from December 7, 2018, originating from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The email, sent to other USANYS staff including a contractor, has the subject line 'Call/Meeting on Epstein', indicating internal coordination or investigation discussions regarding Jeffrey Epstein prior to his 2019 arrest. The names of the sender and recipients are redacted.
This document is an email chain from January 24, 2020, involving employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the urgent collection of questionnaires for 'Official Foreign Travel' to Stockholm in 2020. One sender expresses concern regarding their passport having only five months remaining before expiration.
An email chain from July 2021 between the Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the SDNY (US Attorney's Office) and attorney Stacey Richman. The SDNY official requests a call regarding Mark Epstein. Stacey attempts to have Mark Epstein join the call, noting he hopes for information regarding his brother Jeffrey Epstein's death ('demise'). The SDNY official explicitly declines Mark's presence, stating that is not the purpose of the call and insisting on speaking with Stacey alone first.
An email dated July 6, 2019, from a redacted USANYS employee to US Attorney Geoffrey Berman regarding 'Epstein draft press materials.' The sender confirms passing information to a team. The document is heavily redacted, with two subsequent pages completely blacked out.
This document contains a chain of emails from May and June 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI. The correspondence concerns locating and contacting a female witness or subject in California who appears to be unrepresented by counsel. The emails discuss logistical details of making contact, including phone calls and a potential trip to California to interview her in person.
This document is an email chain from February to April 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and technical/forensic teams regarding the processing of evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties. Key issues discussed include technical difficulties linking emails to attachments (using 'flight records' as a hypothetical example), the large volume of data (over 1 million documents), and the inventory of devices seized from the NY Mansion and Virgin Islands. The emails also reveal that 9 hard drives found in the NY apartment were actually copies of drives seized during a previous 2007 search.
This document is an email notification dated December 8, 2019, confirming the acceptance of an invitation to an 'Epstein Team Meeting'. The email was sent to an individual at the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), likely related to the ongoing investigation following Jeffrey Epstein's death or preparation for related prosecutions. The names of both the sender and recipient are redacted.
This document is an email from October 5, 2021, sent by an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The email appears to transmit a legal document attached as '2021.10.05_scheduling_order.pdf' to a recipient within the US Attorney's office (USANYS). The names and contact details are redacted.
This document is an email header dated February 1, 2021, sent between individuals at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The names and specific subject matter are redacted, but the email contains several embedded message files (.msg) as attachments. The document bears the Bates number EFTA00029250.
An email dated November 5, 2019, sent by an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line links to a Fox News article about ABC anchor Amy Robach's 'hot mic' comments regarding the network's coverage of Jeffrey Epstein. The entire body of the message is redacted.
This document is an internal email from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated May 25, 2021. It circulates a draft legal opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed bail application/motion for release in the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals. The sender requests edits from the team before a deadline on the following Thursday.
This document is an email chain from July 25, 2019, between an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and a Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). The correspondence concerns the transfer of 'staff memos and photos' related to an investigation into an incident involving Jeffrey Epstein that occurred 'earlier this week' (referencing his suicide attempt). The emails establish that a written request via email was sufficient for the BOP to release the documents without a subpoena, and discuss coordination with Main Justice.
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding updates to the 'Victim Witness' website for the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The emails finalize the text for a public update announcing that on July 18, 2019, the court ruled Epstein would remain incarcerated pending trial, and scheduling the next pretrial conference for July 31, 2019.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity