This document contains a series of emails from January 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the DOJ Attaché at the US Embassy in Paris. They discuss the ongoing French investigation into Jean-Luc Brunel, who was in custody at the time. Key topics include the French authorities' request for evidence from the Epstein investigation (specifically photos and database records using facial recognition), the drafting of Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) requests, and the French judiciary's insistence on reciprocity before sharing their own evidence with the US. The emails also mention the existence of photos of Brunel within seized Epstein evidence and the potential cooperation of two adult victims abused in Paris.
This document is an email exchange from February 2021 between an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and a contractor named Chris regarding the 'US v. Epstein (SW Returns)' Relativity database. The AUSA requests assistance in viewing 'NYC serial numbers' to identify which device specific documents originated from. Chris responds with instructions to use the 'file path field' and references a screenshot (which is largely redacted).
This document is an email chain from July 6-7, 2019, between Assistant U.S. Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The emails discuss the drafting and transmission of a search warrant ('Second_New_York_Residence_SW.v3.docx') to the FBI, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence, coinciding with the timeline of his arrest. The sender notes they delivered materials to the FBI and are awaiting a response.
An email chain from January 24, 2020, coordinating foreign travel for an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA). The correspondence involves the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), the Executive Office for US Attorneys (EOUSA), and the Office of International Affairs (OIA). The discussion focuses on gathering necessary documentation, specifically an ECC (Electronic Country Clearance) package, a questionnaire, and approval from the OIA.
An email exchange dated January 24, 2020, involving personnel from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the urgent submission of a questionnaire related to 'Official Foreign Travel' to Stockholm in 2020. The specific identities of the sender and recipients are redacted.
An internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY), dated March 12, 2019. The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit asks a colleague for the name of an individual (possibly a Chief of Staff) to include in an 'Epstein memo,' indicating active work on the Epstein case months prior to his July 2019 arrest.
This document contains an email exchange from July 2019 between two unidentified legal professionals, one of whom is with the USANYS. The exchange involves congratulations on the handling of the 'Epstein case,' describing the work as 'exhausting and difficult' but 'unbelievable.' The responder acknowledges the 'crazy process' but notes they are 'off to a good start.'
An internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Affairs) dated February 7, 2020. The email conveys an attachment titled 'Larry_Ray_Q_&_A_2.7.2020.docx', likely related to press inquiries or preparation regarding the Larry Ray case.
This document is an email chain from January 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and MDC staff regarding the delivery of legal discovery materials (hard drives) to Ghislaine Maxwell. The FBI assisted in transporting the drives. The delivery was delayed because the paralegal responsible for logging the drives was absent, and when delivery was attempted, Maxwell was occupied with a Video Teleconference (VTC).
This document is a chain of emails between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) spanning February to June 2020. The correspondence details the logistical and technical challenges of processing approximately 40-50 TB of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's New York mansion and Virgin Islands property. Key issues include the compatibility of forensic data with the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform, delays caused by FBI network upgrades and COVID-19 staffing reductions, and the inventorying of specific devices including servers, laptops, and hard drives.
This document is an internal email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York sent on August 28, 2019. The subject is 'Lengthy Letter' and it includes an attachment titled '2019.08.29_Letter_to_RMB_v2.docx', likely referring to a letter addressed to Judge Richard M. Berman (RMB) prepared for the following day.
This document is an internal email chain from December 23, 2019, among staff and contractors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing the location and existence of deposition transcripts from the 'Roberts v. Maxwell' civil suit stored on an 'Epstein share drive.' Specifically, they confirm that a redacted female individual was deposed but 'invoked 5 throughout' (referring to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination).
This document is a digital calendar entry for an 'Update Conference Call - Epstein' scheduled for August 13, 2019, which is three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The meeting was attended by an individual from the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS), whose identity is redacted.
This document is an email chain dated August 13, 2019, three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. A Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) contacts the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) seeking records from Epstein's prior incarceration in Florida to assist with 'various investigations into the incident this past weekend.' The USANYS official replies that they have been 'walled off' from the investigation but provides a contact at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Violent Crimes/Homicide division.
An email chain from August 14, 2019 (four days after Jeffrey Epstein's death) between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns a meeting with 'Geoff' (likely US Attorney Geoffrey Berman) regarding the 'Epstein forfeiture' and strategy for approaching a female subject (likely Ghislaine Maxwell). The emails discuss her new status as the 'principal subject,' the possibility of her claiming 'victimization' via an innocence proffer, and instructions to contact her counsel.
An email chain from April 2019 between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Public Corruption Unit). The correspondence discusses the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically inquiring about a pending ruling from an individual referred to as 'CM', with one official noting they are waiting 'with bated breath'.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated April 10-13, 2020. It details the submission of a prosecution memo regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell investigation and mentions that the team is working on a draft indictment. The correspondence involves scheduling a conference call with 'team and chiefs' to discuss the memo.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 16, 2019. It confirms that the Office of Chief Medical Examiner (OCME) had officially concluded Jeffrey Epstein's cause of death was hanging and the manner of death was suicide. The email notes that a press release and official death certificate were forthcoming later that afternoon.
An email dated November 8, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to the USANYS team. The email attaches a draft 'Daubert motion' aimed at precluding testimony related to 'Dietz and Loftus' (likely experts Park Dietz and Elizabeth Loftus). The sender notes that the Dietz section is complete and praised a colleague's work on it, while the Loftus section is undergoing revisions.
An email chain between USANYS officials discussing a potential inmate cooperator at the MCC. The cooperator claims that another inmate admitted to providing Jeffrey Epstein with the sheets he used to commit suicide. The officials discuss the credibility of this second-hand information and whether to extend a cooperation agreement.
This document is an email dated March 5, 2021, from the Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The email, sent to redacted colleagues within USANYS, contains a monthly update attachment. The specific names and contact details of the individuals involved are redacted.
An email dated October 1, 2021, from a Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit at the Southern District of New York (USANYS) to a redacted recipient. The email attaches an outline of 'cross riffs' (likely cross-examination questions or strategy) for the following day and requests feedback.
This document is a calendar invitation for a Webex meeting scheduled for March 10, 2021, titled 'Epstein/Maxwell FOIA'. The meeting was organized by an individual from the USANYS (United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York) and sent to a redacted attendee, likely concerning Freedom of Information Act requests related to the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell cases.
This document is an email invitation for a Webex meeting dated March 10, 2021, between employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject of the meeting is 'Epstein/Maxwell FOIA', indicating a discussion regarding Freedom of Information Act requests related to the case.
An internal email dated August 4, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the 'Epstein database.' The sender flags a specific document (control number USGME00032574) titled 'joint defense agreement' found within the search warrant database, noting they did not open it (likely to preserve privilege) and asking a colleague to review it.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity