| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-01 | N/A | Scheduled call/chat regarding the OPR Epstein Report (window 1-2pm or after 3pm). | Phone/Remote | View |
| 2020-10-22 | N/A | Conversation regarding outstanding discovery items | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Drafting/Updating of a press release regarding Jeffrey Epstein at the MCC on the day of his death. | MCC (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-09 | N/A | Discussion about materials from 'the first one' and 'the second conference' related to Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-02-13 | N/A | Discussion of scanning and transmitting 16,000 to 29,000 pages of records. | Unknown | View |
| 2016-02-29 | N/A | Meeting between legal team/correspondents. | Unknown | View |
This document contains a chain of emails from October 15, 2020, discussing the technical details of document production and e-discovery for the case 'US v. Epstein'. The participants discuss refining search terms to identify 'junk' versus 'responsive' documents, specifically troubleshooting a keyword search that inadvertently captured responsive material. The conversation involves two distinct databases or search sets: 'US v. Epstein database' and 'US v. Epstein (SW)'.
This document is an email thread between January and February 2020 regarding the technical processing and legal review of digital evidence seized in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The correspondence details the transfer of hard drives from FBI CART to a legal team, the upload of this voluminous data to the Relativity e-discovery platform, and the organization of files for privilege review ('PP hits'). The emails highlight technical challenges due to the massive size of the FBI case file and the search warrant returns.
This document is an email chain from September 26, 2019, originating from a US Department of Justice (postmaster@voip.usa.doj.gov) voice message notification. The recipients discuss the notification, with one noting they believe they received it in error 'along with the Epstein team,' to which another replies, 'It is happening again.' The document dates from after Jeffrey Epstein's death, likely involving his estate or legal team.
This document is an internal email chain dated June 7 and 8, 2021, likely between law enforcement or legal personnel. The correspondence concerns the transfer and filing of an 'Ejustice record' (likely a criminal history or background check from the NY State system) for a specific, redacted individual. This individual is identified as a 'testifying witness,' and the record is to be placed in a 'testifying witness folder on the Epstein share,' indicating active case management related to the Epstein investigation.
This document is an email chain from April 2021 regarding discovery issues in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (SDNY). The correspondence discusses technical difficulties defense counsel encountered in matching FBI-generated metadata spreadsheets to Bates-numbered images in 'Production 11' (SDNY_PROD011). The government team coordinates a conference call with a vendor to provide an 'overlay file' to resolve the matching issue.
This document is an email chain dated August 1, 2019, between US Attorneys in the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York. The emails discuss a significant Second Circuit Court of Appeals decision in *United States v. Boustani*, which ruled that wealthy defendants cannot use their financial resources to pay for 'private jails' (home confinement with private security) to secure bail when poorer defendants would be detained. This legal precedent was highly relevant to the Jeffrey Epstein case, as Epstein had attempted to secure bail under similar conditions shortly before this date.
This document is an email chain from May 2021 among Assistant United States Attorneys for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) discussing the Ghislaine Maxwell ('GM') case. The emails concern the drafting of a government letter regarding a proposed trial date and the team's response to the defendant's supplemental pretrial motions which had been filed on May 7, 2021. The correspondence references a superseding indictment ('superseder') and notes an opposition deadline of May 21st.
This document is an email chain from September 18, 2020, discussing a former personal assistant to Jeffrey Epstein who worked for him during the 1999-2002 period. The correspondents discuss the potential subpoena of this individual, noting they do not recall previous conversations about it, and one party plans to contact federal defenders regarding the matter.
This document is an email thread from January 29, 2020, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing an application for a 'Sharing Order' related to Jeffrey Epstein's estate, specifically concerning additional trust and will documents received from estate attorneys over the prior two weeks. The discussion focuses on accurately describing the materials, with one participant noting the absence of 'revocations' in the description.
This document is a heavily redacted email chain from December 9, 2019, post-dating Jeffrey Epstein's death. The participants are scheduling a time to 'talk Epstein' the following day (December 10) at 12:30. One participant mentions they 'just met with the team,' suggesting ongoing internal discussions regarding Epstein matters within the organization (likely a bank or legal firm given the context of such document releases).
This document is an email chain from June 23, 2021, among US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff. The discussion concerns a request for a one-week extension on a FOIA disclosure regarding 'Noel/Thomas' (referring to the prison guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas charged in connection with Jeffrey Epstein's death). The Public Corruption Unit Chief requested the delay to verify that recent interviews satisfied the requirements of the guards' deferred prosecution agreements before releasing information to The Times (NY Times).
This document is an internal email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated February 2021. The correspondence concerns the drafting and review of the government's opposition to a motion to suppress evidence filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. The prosecutors discuss the length and complexity of the draft, due process arguments, and coordinate internal reviews before submission to their chiefs.
This document is an internal DOJ/USANYS email thread from July 6, 2019, confirming Jeffrey Epstein's arrest after he flew into Teterboro, NJ. The correspondence clarifies that a Search Warrant (SW) was issued specifically for his Manhattan residence (NYC house), correcting a misunderstanding that it might be for his plane. The emails also note that CNN had already contacted the office seeking confirmation of the arrest.
An email chain from January and February 2020 discussing the logistical handling of digital evidence seized in the Epstein case. The correspondence details the receipt of a hard drive from the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) containing data from seized devices, which required uploading to the Relativity platform for privilege review. The emails also mention that the FBI had another batch of materials to transmit shortly for the same process.
This document is an email chain from late September 2020 between members of a legal team regarding the 'Fourth Production' of discovery materials. Key topics include the technical handling of 'LSJ Scene2Go' (an application containing 3D maps of Little St. James, specifically the grotto and main structure), the processing of a JPMorgan document production, and the status of files related to 'Maxwell's MDC drive'. The team discusses strategies for Bates stamping viewable image files versus system files to ensure the defense can utilize the materials.
An internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated March 11, 2019. The discussion concerns presenting on campaign finance cases involving the NRA, PIC, and GEP, noting their ties to the President (POTUS) and asking if a specific individual needs to recuse themselves ('step out'). A response in the chain simply states 'Epstein OK', potentially referring to the status of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation or a related matter.
An email thread dated July 9, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein. The participants joke about his appearance, confusing him with an actor from 'NCIS' (likely Mark Harmon given the context of looking like a twin), identifying him as a 'rich finance guy', and quipping about a future Lifetime movie. The names of the correspondents are redacted.
This document is an internal email thread between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated October 17, 2018. The correspondence circulates a legal opinion by Judge Sweet regarding the 'Right of Public Access Judicial Document' in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, which the sender noted reading about in the New York Law Journal (NYLJ).
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated between April 30 and May 3, 2021. The discussion concerns drafting a response to Judge Nathan's order regarding Rule 17 subpoenas related to specific evidence items: 'Diary, boots, photos'. The emails mention reviewing briefs filed by 'BSF/GM' (likely Boies Schiller Flexner and Ghislaine Maxwell) and preparing the response for review by 'the chiefs' before a Tuesday deadline.
This document contains an email chain dated August 11, 2019, among USANYS officials, including U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman, regarding the preliminary results of Jeffrey Epstein's autopsy. The email states that the OCME found injuries consistent with strangulation/hanging, specifically noting a 'broken hiatal bone' and left shoulder injuries, with no immediate reason to suspect foul play (non-suicide). It notes that the final report is pending toxicology results and review of interviews with the guards who found him.
This document is an email chain between Assistant United States Attorneys (USANYS) dated May 4 and May 5, 2021. The subject concerns 'GM Flashlight Checks' and includes attachments referencing an order by 'AJN' (Judge Alison J. Nathan) regarding 'GM Sleeping Conditions,' referring to the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell. The body of the emails is heavily redacted.
This document is an internal email chain from December 23, 2019, among staff and contractors at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing the location and existence of deposition transcripts from the 'Roberts v. Maxwell' civil suit stored on an 'Epstein share drive.' Specifically, they confirm that a redacted female individual was deposed but 'invoked 5 throughout' (referring to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination).
An email chain from January 18, 2019, between USANYS officials discussing a recent trip related to the Epstein case. The participants are arranging a debriefing meeting, noting that senior leadership ('Brass') is interested in the outcome. One participant is traveling back on that day, and scheduling is complicated by the upcoming MLK holiday.
This document is an email chain from August and September 2019 involving the Southern District of New York (SDNY) regarding the case 'US v. Epstein'. The correspondence discusses the technical processing of evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's Manhattan residence, specifically loading data extracted from hard drives into the Relativity platform for privilege review. It clarifies that the data in question originated from the Manhattan search warrant returns and explicitly excludes materials seized from the US Virgin Islands.
This document is an email chain from August 12, 2019, between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence arranges a meeting for the following day at 10:00 AM to 'discuss next steps in the Epstein case.' This exchange takes place two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death on August 10, 2019.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity