house
LocationRelationship Network
EFTA00030692.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome of Blackfords LLP in early January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary law enforcement interview with Bloxsome's client, HRH The Duke of York (Prince Andrew), regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence confirms Blackfords' representation of the Duke and arranges a preliminary telephone discussion for January 10, 2020.
EFTA00026542.pdf
This document contains an email exchange from January 2020 between Gary Bloxsome of Blackfords LLP and federal prosecutors from the Southern District of New York. The prosecutors, investigating conduct related to Jeffrey Epstein, inquired if Blackfords represented HRH The Duke of York (Prince Andrew). Gary Bloxsome confirmed the representation and asked for clarification regarding the specific reason for the contact.
EFTA00010321.pdf
This document is an email chain from August and September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, the legal team representing the Duke of York (Prince Andrew). The correspondence details a stalemate in negotiations regarding the Duke's cooperation with the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The Duke's lawyers offer a written witness statement limited primarily to the 1994-1997 period, citing concerns that the US views him as a 'subject' rather than a witness. The SDNY rejects this offer, declaring the written statement insufficient, and informs the defense they will proceed with a Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) request to the UK authorities (UKCA) to seek a compelled interview.
EFTA00002247.pdf
An evidence photograph showing the interior of a utility or storage area characterized by white cinder block walls and concrete columns. The image features a red vertical sign reading 'FIRE EXTINGUISHER' above a black mounting bracket, though the extinguisher itself is missing. Next to the sign is a piece of paper taped to the wall with a large letter 'A'. Two wooden tool handles lean against the wall near a gray metal door. In the background, stored furniture or equipment is visible. The image is labeled with the Bates stamp EFTA00002247.
EFTA00001911.pdf
Financial check register covering November 2011 to January 2012. The document lists significant expenditures for property maintenance (Field House, Bedford, 760 Park, SH), legal fees (McDermott Will & Emery), and political contributions (Stabenow, Hatch, Carper). Notable transactions include two $25,000 cash withdrawals marked 'LDB', a $25,000 gift to Melanie Spinella, and a $15,000 donation to Tibetan Mastiff Rescue.
EFTA00001838.pdf
This document is a photograph (evidence exhibit EFTA00001838) showing the interior of a room, likely a library or study within one of Jeffrey Epstein's properties. The room features ornate wooden bookshelves, a ceiling painted to look like the sky, several sculptures, and a large blackboard with handwritten words including 'Dissipation', 'molecules', 'muscles', and 'Beauty'.
DOJ-OGR-00018384.jpg
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate testifies that Ghislaine Maxwell invited her by phone to her house, complimented her on a previous 'job', and stated that 'He' (implied to be Epstein) wanted her to return. Maxwell then led Kate to a room, opened the door to reveal Jeffrey Epstein standing naked, and told Kate to 'Have a good time.'
DOJ-OGR-00017804.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the redirect examination of a witness named Jane, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning clarifies that Jane moved residences in the spring of 1995, that her international travel in high school was for family trips unrelated to Maxwell and Epstein, and confirms she was previously questioned about making a statement to a tabloid regarding Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014791.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (filed August 22, 2022). The judge establishes factual findings for sentencing enhancements, noting that Maxwell partially owned the jet, directed pilots (Visoski, Alessi, Rodgers) to transport victims, and acted as 'Epstein's number one' by managing his households and staff. The text explicitly mentions Sarah Kellen as Maxwell's personal assistant and applies sentencing guidelines based on Maxwell's leadership role in the conspiracy between 1994 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00001543.jpg
This document is a notice from a legal case in the Southern District of New York, filed on July 7, 2020. It instructs all individuals, including the public and attorneys, on the mandatory health screening procedures required for entry into the courthouse, which involve completing a questionnaire and a temperature check via a provided weblink or QR code.
DOJ-OGR-00001300.jpg
This legal document outlines the Court's decision to grant Mr. Robertson release to a halfway house under extremely strict conditions, including home incarceration and GPS monitoring. The Court details numerous restrictions on his movement, communication, and contact with others, believing these measures are sufficient to ensure community safety and prevent flight risk. The document also notes a pretrial conference where Mr. Robertson was warned that any violation would result in immediate reincarceration.
DOJ-OGR-00001297.jpg
This document is page 7 of a court order filed on February 6, 2020, regarding 'Mr. Robertson' (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV). The court discusses the legal standards for detention under 18 U.S.C. § 3142 and finds that Mr. Robertson has successfully rebutted the presumption of detention. Factors cited for his release include his voluntary surrender, family ties, and placement at La Pasada Halfway House.
DOJ-OGR-00001296.jpg
This document is page 6 of a court order filed on February 8, 2021, regarding United States v. Robertson (Case 1:17-cr-02949-MV). The court is reconsidering and granting Mr. Robertson's release to the La Pasada Halfway House due to trial delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and the inability to hold in-person attorney-client meetings at the Albuquerque courthouse. The court cites 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e) and strict conditions as the basis for assuring community safety and the defendant's appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00001291.jpg
This document is a Memorandum Opinion and Order from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico regarding Defendant Dashawn Robertson's motion for reconsideration of his detention order. After reviewing various filings and holding a pretrial conference on February 4, 2021, the Court ordered Mr. Robertson's release under strict conditions to La Pasada Halfway House on February 5, 2021. The decision was made to ensure his appearance in court and community safety, and to facilitate his trial preparation, which was hindered by the COVID-19 pandemic affecting communication with his attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00020652.jpg
This document is a section of a court docket from the Southern District of New York in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from April 7, 2021, to April 16, 2021. It details procedural events including the rescheduling of an arraignment on a superseding indictment, the denial of a request regarding materials in courthouse cellblocks due to US Marshal policy, and a motion to continue the trial date. The document also includes judicial orders regarding redactions and the unsealing of specific legal memorandums.
DOJ-OGR-00018910.jpg
This document is a page from the court testimony of a witness named Shawn in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Shawn testifies about being with an individual named Carolyn in West Palm Beach when Carolyn received a package from New York containing lingerie and a movie. Shawn also confirms visiting Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house with Carolyn, Virginia, Tony, and two other unidentified individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00015682.jpg
This document is an email thread between Ghislaine Maxwell (G. Max) and Sally Markham from May 2001. Maxwell writes a scathing critique of a staff member named John, listing specific failures regarding the maintenance of a property (likely Palm Beach), including a dirty pool deck, missing items in the 'black Merc' (Mercedes), a burnt-out bulb on 'JE's' (Jeffrey Epstein's) desk, and messy massage creams in JE's bathroom. Sally Markham responds, attempting to manage the situation by noting John is distracted by a family death, while also discussing administrative matters like resumes and the 'PB manual'.
DOJ-OGR-00030632.jpg
This Probable Cause Affidavit from the Palm Beach Police Department, dated May 1, 2006, details statements by a witness named Robson. Robson describes being paid to recruit young girls (ages 14-16) for Jeffrey Epstein after he told her 'the younger the better' and rejected a 23-year-old. The document details specific payments for recruiting and sexualized massages, and identifies a 14-year-old victim referred to as SG.
DOJ-OGR-00030614.jpg
This document is page 9 of a Probable Cause Affidavit filed by the Palm Beach Police Department on May 1, 2006. It details testimony from witnesses 'YL' and a redacted individual regarding sexual misconduct by Jeffrey Epstein. The affidavit describes payments for massages, the recruitment of minors (including a 16-year-old named 'ML') by Haley Robson and an associate named Sarah, and specific allegations that Epstein masturbated during massages and pressured girls to undress.
DOJ-OGR-00021589.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (likely a sentencing hearing) detailing Ghislaine Maxwell's managerial role in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal enterprise between 1994 and 2004. The judge cites testimony from pilots (Visoski, Alessi, Rodgers) and notes Maxwell's control over household staff and her own assistants, including Sarah Kellen, to justify legal sentencing enhancements for leading extensive criminal activity.
DOJ-OGR-00021172.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated June 7, 2023, from Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York to Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe, the Clerk of Court for the Second Circuit. Rohrbach formally notifies the court that he is leaving his position at the U.S. Attorney's Office and requests to be removed as counsel of record for the prosecution in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426-cr).
DOJ-OGR-00019340.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated September 15, 2020, from attorney Adam Mueller of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Gerard Whidbee at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Mueller, representing Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell, formally selects October 22, 2020, as the due date for filing her opening brief in the case of United States v. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00016422.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mulligan. Mulligan testifies about dating a woman named Annie through 2003, describing her family's financial struggles and living situation with her single mother and sister, Ashley. The testimony concludes with the prosecutor asking about a specific trip Annie took to New York.
DOJ-OGR-00013797.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Mulligan, filed on August 10, 2022. Mulligan testifies about his past romantic relationship with a woman named Annie, which ended in 2003, and their current friendship. He also describes Annie's family situation in high school, stating she lived with her sister, Ashley, and their single mother, who he believed was struggling financially.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity