| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
47
Very Strong
|
47 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Client |
26
Very Strong
|
26 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Client |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
organization
Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
AMI
|
Employment |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Indyke
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
defendants
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
AMI
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nine East 71st Street Corporation
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mariann Meier Wang
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Indyke (Defendants)
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Andrew Villacastin
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-06 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Co-Executors' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-26 | N/A | Request to withdraw document ECF No. 40 | Court Docket (ECF) | View |
| 2021-08-13 | N/A | Filing of Declaration of Bennet J. Moskowitz in support of Co-Executors' Statement | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-08-13 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Bennet J. Moskowitz | New York, New York | View |
| 2021-06-30 | N/A | Filing of letter informing Court of desire to lift stay | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-12-01 | N/A | Joint Status Report submitted to the Court. | New York | View |
| 2020-12-01 | N/A | Filing of Joint Status Report | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Submission of Status Report | New York | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Submission of Joint Status Report via ECF | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-10-07 | N/A | Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice signed by parties. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-10-01 | N/A | Submission of Joint Status Report requesting a stay of the case. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Filing of joint status report requesting stay of discovery. | New York | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Filing of Status Report requesting continuation of stay | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Joint submission of status report and request for extension. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-08-14 | N/A | Joint submission of status report requesting extension | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-07-09 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Change of Address by Bennet J. Moskowitz | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-06-19 | N/A | Joint Stipulation submitted by parties | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed and signed by counsel for both pa... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-30 | N/A | Filing of Document 40 in Case 1:19-cv-10788-GHW-DCF. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Filing of Document 60 in Case 1:19-cv-07625-AJN-DCF | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-28 | N/A | Filing of letter to Judge Freeman regarding supplemental authority. | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-04-27 | N/A | Meet and confer telephone call regarding discovery deficiencies | Telephone | View |
This document contains a letter from Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Debra Freeman in the SDNY, dated June 3, 2020, informing the court that the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands has officially authorized the establishment of the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. Attached is the official Order from the USVI court (signed by Judge Hermon-Percell) granting the motion to establish the program and authorizing its commencement on June 15, 2020. The document notes that the USVI Attorney General has agreed to lift liens to allow funding for the program.
This document is a Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed on May 21, 2020, in the US District Court (SDNY) for the case Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein). It establishes legal protocols for designating, handling, and protecting confidential discovery materials, including medical records, financial information, and the names of alleged minor victims. The order binds the parties, their attorneys, and third parties to specific non-disclosure requirements.
This document is a court filing dated April 28, 2020, submitted by attorneys for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein to Judge Paul Gardephe in the Teresa Helm case. It encloses a newly issued Opinion & Order by Judge Paul Engelmayer in a separate case (Mary Doe v. Indyke et al.), which grants the Estate's motion to dismiss claims for punitive damages. The court ruled that under New York law (EPTL § 11-3.2(a)(1)) and likely US Virgin Islands common law, punitive damages cannot be recovered from the estate of a deceased tortfeasor because they serve a penal rather than remedial purpose.
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated April 15, 2020, requesting a 30-day extension for various deadlines in civil cases filed by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Epstein Estate executors. The request cites the ongoing pandemic as the reason for the delay and lists specific new dates for discovery and reports, which Judge Freeman approved via a 'SO ORDERED' endorsement on the same day.
This document is a Reply Memorandum filed by the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) moving to dismiss a complaint by plaintiff Teresa Helm. The defendants argue that Helm's claims are time-barred by the statute of limitations and that she has failed to prove 'extraordinary circumstances' or a relevant criminal indictment to toll this period. Additionally, the defense argues that punitive damages are not recoverable against an estate under either New York law (where the alleged torts occurred) or USVI law (where the estate is probated).
This document is a legal memorandum filed by the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate moving to dismiss a complaint by Teresa Helm. The defendants argue that Helm's claims of battery and emotional distress, stemming from an alleged 2002 sexual assault in New York when she was 22, are time-barred by the statute of limitations which expired in 2005. They further argue that statutory exceptions for criminal proceedings do not apply because Epstein's indictment involved trafficking minors, whereas Helm was an adult, and that punitive damages are legally barred against an estate.
A letter filed on February 20, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Paul G. Gardephe in the case of Teresa Helm v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. Moskowitz requests a one-day extension for filing a Motion to Dismiss due to illness, pushing the deadline to February 24, 2020. The document includes a memo endorsement signed by Judge Gardephe on February 22, 2020, granting the request.
Legal correspondence dated February 20, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Paul G. Gardephe regarding the case Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The letter requests a one-business-day extension for filing the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss due to the attorney's recent illness, adjusting the deadline to February 24, 2020.
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff outlines broad discovery requests, including Epstein's flight logs, helicopter logs, financial records, Amazon order history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators. The Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope of discovery strictly to the alleged abuse of the plaintiff and her damages, and the document outlines conflicting proposed deadlines for the discovery process.
Attorneys for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein request a pre-motion conference to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Teresa Helm. The defense argues that Helm's claims of assault from 2002 are barred by the statute of limitations and that exceptions based on Epstein's criminal indictment do not apply because Helm was an adult (22) at the time, while the indictment focused on minors. Additionally, the defense argues that punitive damages cannot be legally awarded against a deceased person's estate under New York law.
This document is a civil summons issued on November 13, 2019, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein). The summons notifies the defendants that a lawsuit has been filed against them and instructs them to respond within 21 days. The second page contains a blank Proof of Service form.
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10476). The plaintiff, Teresa Helm, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The summons directs the defendants to serve an answer to the complaint on the plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, within 21 days.
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 11, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit brought by Teresa Helm against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defendants named are Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' under Torts, and the plaintiff demands a jury trial.
This document is a Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed on April 1, 2021, in the case of Maria Farmer v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The legal action was dismissed with prejudice following Maria Farmer's acceptance of an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. The order was signed by U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
A legal stipulation filed on April 1, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, dismissing Maria Farmer's lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn). The dismissal is with prejudice and results from Farmer accepting an offer of compensation from the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program.
A 'Notice of Change of Address' filed on July 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York case Maria Farmer v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. Attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz notifies the court that his law firm, formerly Troutman Sanders LLP, is now Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP, though the address remains the same at 875 Third Avenue, New York, NY.
This document is a Joint Stipulation and Order filed in April 2020 in the Southern District of New York, staying the lawsuit brought by Maria Farmer against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The stay was agreed upon to allow Farmer to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims. The order was signed by Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald.
A legal stipulation filed on April 9, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, wherein Plaintiff Maria Farmer and the Executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate (Indyke and Kahn) agreed to stay the lawsuit. The stay was requested to allow Farmer to participate in the 'Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program,' a non-adversarial alternative for resolving sexual abuse claims against the estate.
This document is the formal Answer and Affirmative Defenses filed by the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn) in response to a civil complaint by Annie Farmer. The executors generally deny knowledge of the specific allegations of abuse but admit to certain procedural facts, such as Epstein's arrest date (July 6, 2019), death date (August 10, 2019), and property ownership in NY, NM, USVI, FL, and France. They assert ten affirmative defenses, including failure to state a claim, contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and statute of limitations arguments challenging the New York Child Victims' Act.
Legal correspondence dated March 23, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. The letter requests a four-day extension to respond to the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint in the case of Maria Farmer v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, citing logistical difficulties caused by the COVID-19 outbreak and lockdown in the tri-state area.
This document is a legal letter dated January 24, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz (representing the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein) to Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald. The letter requests a pre-motion conference to move for the dismissal of a lawsuit filed by Maria Farmer. The defense argues that Farmer's claims of assault occurring in Ohio in 1995/1996 are time-barred under both New York and Ohio statutes of limitations and that her arguments for tolling (based on Epstein's later criminal indictment or equitable estoppel) are legally insufficient. It also argues that punitive damages cannot be awarded against an estate.
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10474-NRB). Plaintiff Maria Farmer is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The summons directs the defendants to respond to the complaint within 21 days of service, with Joshua Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP listed as the plaintiff's attorney.
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit initiated by Maria Farmer against Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The nature of the suit is categorized as 'Other Personal Injury' under diversity jurisdiction, as the plaintiff resides in Arkansas and the defendants are deemed citizens of the U.S. Virgin Islands (Epstein's domicile). The plaintiff demands a jury trial.
This document is a legal stipulation filed on November 5, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, regarding case 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF. The plaintiff, 'Jane Doe,' voluntarily dismisses her claims with prejudice against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The dismissal is agreed upon by counsel for both parties without costs to either side.
This document is a legal letter dated September 10, 2021, filed by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Pepper on behalf of the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein (Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn). The letter is addressed to Judge Debra C. Freeman regarding the case 'Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn' (Case 1:20-cv-02365). The defense informs the court that they are working jointly with the Plaintiff to settle the matter out of court and requests a sixty-day stay of proceedings until November 9, 2021.
Request for a sixty-day stay of the action to attempt extrajudicial resolution (settlement).
Request to withdraw the Parties' Joint Proposed Discovery Schedule (ECF No. 40) due to incorrect signature and contact information.
Request to file Statement with redactions regarding Plaintiff's application to proceed anonymously.
Notification to the court that the Plaintiff desires to lift the stay of action; agreement on response deadlines; deadline for anonymous filing.
Request to lift stay of action and set deadlines for response and anonymity motion.
Status report informing the court that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requesting the case remain stayed.
Status report informing the judge that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program and requesting the case remain stayed.
Status report requesting the case remain stayed as the Plaintiff seeks to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program.
Status report informing the court that the Plaintiff has received an award offer from the Compensation Program and the parties request the case remain stayed.
Joint status report requesting the case remain stayed while Plaintiff pursues a claim through the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
Status report requesting the case remain stayed as Plaintiff intends to submit a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
Joint status report requesting the case remain stayed as the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
Status report informing the court that the Plaintiff intends to participate in the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program and requesting the case remain stayed.
Joint status report informing the court that the Plaintiff has submitted a claim to the compensation program and requesting the case remain stayed.
Informing the court that Jane Doe 17 submitted a claim to the Victims' Compensation Program on July 11, 2020, and requesting the stay of the lawsuit continue.
Request to continue stay of action as Plaintiff submits claims to Epstein Victims' Compensation Program
Informing the NY Court that the USVI Superior Court entered an order establishing the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
Informing the court that the USVI Superior Court has granted the motion to establish the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program.
Informing the NY Court that the USVI Superior Court granted the motion to establish the Compensation Program.
Request for court approval of an agreement regarding service of complaint and extension of time to respond.
Submission of supplemental authority (Judge Engelmayer's Order in Jane Doe 15 case) regarding motion to dismiss punitive damages.
Letter supplementing a pending motion to dismiss with a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Engelmayer regarding punitive damages.
Supplementing a pending motion to dismiss with a recent Opinion & Order from Judge Engelmayer regarding punitive damages.
Complaint regarding Defendants' failure to respond to interrogatories and document requests.
Request to extend various discovery and filing deadlines by 30 days due to the pandemic.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity