Witness (unnamed)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. LEOPOLD
|
Client |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. PAGLIUCA
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Herman
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Minor Victim-2
|
Alleged interaction |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Deposition | A witness is questioned under oath about their knowledge of and contributions to a specific docum... | N/A | View |
| 2020-02-19 | N/A | Witness interview in Pensacola, Florida. | Pensacola, FL | View |
EFTA00020228.pdf
This document contains an email chain from June 2020 between an Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) and a colleague regarding the preparation of a Grand Jury presentation. The emails request the creation of PowerPoint slides featuring specific excerpts from a deposition (where a witness denies giving massages or knowing of underage recruitment) and excerpts from flight records corresponding to specific dates in 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998. The actual flight logs are mentioned as attachments but are not visible in the text.
DOJ-OGR-00033043.jpg
This is page 55 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about an incident at the Quarterdeck Tavern where she allegedly asked co-workers to lie and switched name tags with a friend named Tiffany to avoid people serving papers. The witness denies asking anyone to lie but admits name tags were switched, claiming it was a coincidence common among staff. Attorneys Leopold and Goldberger discuss the marking of Exhibit 18-001 and photographs.
DOJ-OGR-00008683.jpg
This document is page 145 (marked internal page 62) of a court filing from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on December 18, 2021. It contains jury instructions regarding the evaluation of witness testimony, specifically addressing how to weigh the testimony of a witness with a prior felony conviction and the use of pseudonyms/first names to protect witness privacy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021875.jpg
This document is page 52 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. It features a witness (presumably a lawyer) being questioned by Mr. Simpson about the rationale for including allegations of sexual abuse against Alan Dershowitz involving 'other minors' alongside Virginia Roberts in a legal pleading. The witness asserts that the inclusion was based on the expectation that other victims would testify under oath.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021865.jpg
This document is page 42 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. Attorney Mr. Simpson asks a witness if they knew of anyone (as of Dec 30, 2014) who could testify that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor. Attorney Mr. Scarola objects and instructs the witness not to answer, asserting that even the names of potential witnesses are protected under attorney-client and common interest privilege if that information was communicated confidentially.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021864.jpg
This is a page from a deposition transcript marked as a rough draft. An attorney, Mr. Simpson, questions a witness about whether they knew of any witnesses other than Virginia Roberts who could testify that Alan Dershowitz abused a minor at the time the witness signed a pleading on December 30, 2014. The witness asserts they were proud to sign the pleading and believed further discovery would identify witnesses, while Ms. McCawley interjects with a privilege objection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012437.jpg
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a meeting with 'Mr. Herman'. The witness confirms the meeting occurred at her aunt's house, where a lawsuit was discussed, but claims her aunt's only involvement was opening the door. The witness's attorneys, Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold, are also present, with Mr. Leopold objecting to a question about 'privileged matters'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012409.jpg
This document is page 14 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstructing the deposition and being severely late. The argument revolves around taking a five-minute break, and Mr. Leopold requests assurance that the audio record will be preserved.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity