Mr. Herman
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed 'other girl'
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness's Father
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
location
Witness's aunt's house
|
Minimal interaction |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Deponent
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Litigants |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sloman
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
witness
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Deponent's Father
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness ('A')
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness / Parents
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (unnamed)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (Ms. [REDACTED])
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeff Sloman
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A meeting was held to discuss a 'lawsuit'. The witness states she spent the night at the location... | Witness's aunt's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | A press conference held by Mr. Herman after filing the lawsuit. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A meeting took place between the witness, their lawyer Mr. Herman, and the witness's aunt. The wi... | A friend's house (details r... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A meeting took place between the deponent, her lawyer Mr. Herman, and her aunt. The deponent stat... | At the house of the deponen... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between the witness, their lawyer Mr. Herman, and the witness's aunt. The witness states ... | A friend's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | A lawsuit was filed against Epstein for fifty million dollars by a client of lawyer Mr. Herman. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A press conference was held regarding the witness's lawsuit. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a $50 million lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Press conference held by Mr. Herman regarding the lawsuit. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | A lawsuit was filed against Epstein by a client of Mr. Herman for fifty million dollars. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Draft Indictment | Unknown | View |
| 2025-11-17 | N/A | Mr. Herman filed a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2008-05-19 | N/A | Mr. Herman filed several civil lawsuits against Mr. Epstein. | Unknown | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A deposition of an unnamed witness. The transcript is from pages 89 and 76 of this deposition. | Undisclosed deposition loca... | View |
001-01.pdf
This document contains the deposition transcript of 'Jane Doe' (a minor victim) dated February 20, 2008, and a Civil Complaint filed by her mother against Jeffrey Epstein, Haley Robson, and Sarah Kellen. The deposition covers Jane Doe's family issues, credibility, drug use allegations, and interactions with law enforcement, while the Complaint details the 'scheme' wherein Robson recruited underage girls for Epstein to sexually abuse under the guise of massages. The document also includes procedural filings regarding service of process on Haley Robson.
EFTA00013661.pdf
An email chain concluding with a formal letter from Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's attorney) to Alex [Acosta] (US Attorney). Lefkowitz argues against federal prosecution, claiming 'Main Justice' is not directing it and that it would be a 'novel application' of statutes. He cites witness testimony alleging women lied about their ages to Epstein and that the FBI pressured women to identify as victims. He requests a meeting to resolve the matter before a July 8 state court deadline.
DOJ-OGR-00033084.jpg
This document is page 96 of a deposition transcript recorded by Censor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a witness about their knowledge of communications between FBI agents, federal prosecutors (specifically Marie Villafona and Jeff Sloman), and other individuals (Mr. Leopold and Mr. Herman). The questioning specifically probes whether the witness knew if Mr. Herman was allowed to review or discuss a 'draft indictment' with federal prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00033077.jpg
This is page 89 of a legal deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. The witness is questioned about whether they or their parents spoke to any law firms other than those of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold. The witness denies speaking to others but asks if 'family court matters.' Ultimately, the witness identifies Mr. Leopold as the person who prepared them for that day's deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00033068.jpg
This document is page 80 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unidentified witness is being questioned about their knowledge of other individuals involved in a case, including another person represented by a lawyer named Mr. Herman who is suing someone named Epstein for $50 million. The witness denies knowing this person, as well as individuals named Tony Figueroa and Anthony, but confirms they have read the police reports related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00033039.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding on July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of potential financial compensation from the government for a criminal case and whether they ever received a victim notification letter. The witness denies knowledge of these matters, and another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the form of the questions.
DOJ-OGR-00033037.jpg
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about conversations they had with their aunt concerning a lawsuit and a 'Mr. Herman'. The witness states that Tiffany Rich never had a conversation with Mr. Herman in their presence, and only answered the door before leaving.
DOJ-OGR-00033002.jpg
This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a photograph from a press conference related to the witness's lawsuit, which features the witness's father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects, leading to a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, about the grounds for making objections.
DOJ-OGR-00033001.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving a witness (Ms. [Redacted]) being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold raising objections. The questioning focuses on confirming that an attorney named Mr. Herman filed a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein on the witness's behalf and subsequently held a press conference. The document includes a DOJ Bates stamp and a processing date of 07/26/17.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019229.jpg
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, detailing complaints about the conduct of federal prosecutors in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text alleges that prosecutors made unprecedented financial demands, including a requirement for Epstein to pay $150,000 to alleged victims (most of whom were later found to be adults, not minors) and to fund a specific civil attorney chosen by the prosecution. It further alleges a conflict of interest where an Assistant U.S. Attorney recommended a civil lawyer connected to their boyfriend, and notes that First Assistant Sloman's former law partner, Mr. Herman, began filing civil suits against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025358.jpg
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, likely from Jeffrey Epstein's legal defense team. It outlines complaints against federal prosecutors, alleging they made unprecedented financial demands ($150,000 per alleged victim), attempted to control the selection of civil attorneys for the victims, and engaged in conflicts of interest involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The text also highlights a connection between a civil attorney suing Epstein (Mr. Herman) and a First Assistant prosecutor (Sloman), noting they were former law partners.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012471.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned. The witness denies knowing Detective Recarey or speaking with anyone else who had been to Epstein's house. The witness also denies that they or their parents consulted with any law firms other than that of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold, and confirms they did speak with someone in preparation for the deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012463.jpg
This document is a transcript of a deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned about their knowledge of another alleged victim of Epstein. The witness, represented by a lawyer named Mr. Herman, denies knowing or ever meeting this other person, who is also represented by Mr. Herman and is suing Epstein for $50 million. The witness states they are 'not allowed to know each other' and can only identify individuals by pictures, not names.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012438.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal testimony where an unidentified witness is questioned about their knowledge of matters related to Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies meeting several named agents, including FBI agent Nesbit Kirkendall, and denies ever discussing being reimbursed by Epstein. They also deny any knowledge of an alleged promise by the government to provide money to girls at the end of a criminal prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012437.jpg
This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a meeting with 'Mr. Herman'. The witness confirms the meeting occurred at her aunt's house, where a lawsuit was discussed, but claims her aunt's only involvement was opening the door. The witness's attorneys, Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Leopold, are also present, with Mr. Leopold objecting to a question about 'privileged matters'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012436.jpg
This document is page 41 of a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is questioned about their lawyer, Mr. Herman. The witness clarifies that their father, not them, selected Mr. Herman, and they met him once at a friend's house with their aunt present. An attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to further questions about the meeting, successfully invoking attorney-client privilege.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012435.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an unidentified witness, a plaintiff in a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Epstein, is being questioned. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to questions regarding financial arrangements with their first lawyer, Jeff Herman, citing attorney-client privilege. The witness repeatedly denies knowing Jeff Sloman, despite being told he is a high-ranking prosecutor and the ex-partner of their lawyer, Jeff Herman.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012407.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from a legal proceeding, possibly related to a U.S. House Oversight investigation. A witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a press conference held by their father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman regarding the witness's lawsuit. The deposition becomes contentious as the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects and threatens to leave, prompting a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger.
No Subject
A conversation took place between the witness and Mr. Herman at the aunt's house. The witness states her aunt was present but did not converse, only opening the door. The 'lawsuit' was discussed.
No Subject
A conversation took place between the witness and Mr. Herman at the aunt's house. The witness states her aunt was present but did not converse, only opening the door. The 'lawsuit' was discussed.
Unknown
Question asked if FBI agents told witness these two had spoken. Witness answered 'No'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity