MR. LEOPOLD
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Saige
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
24 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed female witness
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial opposing counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Unnamed Client/Witness
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Client |
10
Very Strong
|
18 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
Witness (unnamed)
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial in deposition |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Unknown |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
[REDACTED] Deponent
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Correspondents |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed female witness
|
Protective representative |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Deponent
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversarial |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Unknown |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Unnamed Witness
|
Witness counsel presumed |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. GOLDBERGER
|
Allies |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Adversaries in a deposition |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions witness Saige, who is represented by attorne... | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or hearing where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness defended by Mr. ... | A room with a table. | View |
| N/A | N/A | A tense exchange during a legal deposition where one attorney (Mr. Leopold) objects to the questi... | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A three-day evidentiary hearing where Mr. Leopold observed Mr. Tein from the back of the courtroom. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition was held where an unnamed witness was questioned by Mr. Tein. The questioning focuse... | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness listened to a prior statement. | here | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious deposition where attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold argue over the nature and form ... | A legal proceeding, possibl... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition involving a contentious argument between attorneys over questioning procedure ... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about a MySpace message (Exhibit 31-001)... | Unspecified deposition loca... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition is taking place where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with their at... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is conducted where a witness is questioned about using a racial slur in a written me... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where Mr. Tein questioned a witness, with Mr. Leopold present as counsel. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or court hearing is being conducted, as evidenced by the Q&A format and presence of ... | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A heated argument occurs during a legal deposition among the attorneys present. The dispute cente... | Deposition Room (unspecified) | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where a witness is questioned by Mr. Tein, with her attorney Mr. Leopold prese... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition of an unnamed witness was conducted. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The witness is questioned by Mr. Tein in a legal proceeding. | Not specified (likely a dep... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony where an unidentified witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where an unnamed witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold also pres... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition or testimony where a witness is questioned by Mr. Tein with Mr. Leopold present. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A legal deposition where attorneys are engaged in a heated procedural dispute. Mr. Tein attempts ... | Undisclosed deposition room | View |
| N/A | N/A | A contentious exchange during a legal deposition. Attorney Leopold accused Attorney Tein of unpro... | Deposition Room | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of a witness named Saige, during which a procedural argument between attorneys Mr. Tei... | Implied to be in or under t... | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition where a witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about their negative characterizatio... | Deposition | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012474.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unnamed witness, questioned by attorney Mr. Tein, discusses their extensive contact with the Palm Beach Police Department regarding Epstein. The witness states they spoke with police 'more than I like can count' over a four-year period, with the last contact being about a year to a year and a half prior, and confirms remembering Detective Michelle Pagan but not Detective Recarey.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012473.jpg
This document is a transcript from a deposition where attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning focuses on a scheduling conflict where the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, was unable to start the deposition that morning due to a court appearance. The witness is also asked if they have listened to a prior tape-recorded statement they gave to the police.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012472.jpg
This document is page 77 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2004. An unidentified witness states that they were prepared for the deposition by Mr. Leopold that same morning. The witness also confirms reading their prior statement to the police, clarifying it was a narrative-style police report, which they reviewed a few days before the deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012471.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned. The witness denies knowing Detective Recarey or speaking with anyone else who had been to Epstein's house. The witness also denies that they or their parents consulted with any law firms other than that of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold, and confirms they did speak with someone in preparation for the deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012470.jpg
This document is page 75 of a deposition transcript, identified as 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012470'. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about whether their family members (mother and mother's husband, Paul) or another redacted individual have spoken to or received money from reporters, which the witness denies. Mr. Tein then attempts to refresh the witness's memory by mentioning a past event where 'she' was arrested for drugs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012469.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript showing a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Mr. Leopold is objecting to the line of questioning, arguing for professionalism and accusing Mr. Tein of harassing the witness. Mr. Tein urges Mr. Leopold to conclude his objection so that he can continue asking questions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012468.jpg
This document is a single page from a contentious deposition transcript, identified by a House Oversight control number. Attorney Mr. Tein aggressively questions a female witness (possibly named Saige) about her family speaking to reporters, leading to a heated argument with the witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, who threatens to end the deposition over Mr. Tein's unprofessional conduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012464.jpg
This document is page 69 of a deposition transcript, likely dated September 29, 2004. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness who denies knowing an individual named Tony, even when presented with details of his alleged criminal past. The witness also denies remembering making a statement to a Detective Pagan but confirms they have read the police reports online and were surprised by their release.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012462.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript from approximately September 29, 2004, identified by a House Oversight bates stamp. An unidentified witness, represented by attorney Mr. Leopold, is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about a person named Steven. The witness states she visited Steven's apartment once 'this past weekend' but does not know the address and that they 'no longer speak'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012460.jpg
This document is page 65 of a legal transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about the identity of a woman they were in a car with. The witness claims not to know the woman's name but had previously described her as "dark like a Spanish girl." Mr. Tein accuses the witness of lying to the police about the woman's identity, which the witness denies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012459.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about Jeffrey Epstein. The witness denies that Epstein or his staff ever harmed their father or his property, and is then questioned about a potentially false statement made to police regarding a trip with a person named Hayley to Epstein's house.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012458.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal deposition where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The focus is on a prior tape-recorded statement the witness allegedly gave to police 'three years ago', accusing Jeffrey Epstein of attempting to murder her father by tampering with his car tires. The witness denies making such a statement, while the attorney confronts her with a direct quote from her alleged police report.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012457.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or testimony where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The witness clarifies that their dad, not Detective Recarey, likely drove them to a Grand Jury testimony when they were 14 or 15. The witness also admits to lying on their MySpace page about their income, claiming 'as a joke' to have made a quarter-million dollars a year.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012455.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition where a witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on inconsistencies on the witness's MySpace profiles, specifically their stated age (18 vs. 19) and the timing of an age change made just four days before a scheduled Grand Jury testimony. The witness admits to lying about their age to use the platform but claims not to know what the questioner is talking about regarding the suspicious timing.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012454.jpg
This document is page 59 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a MySpace page. The witness confirms the page is theirs and admits to having lied about their age, stating they were 18, because of a rule on the platform that required users to be that age to post.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012453.jpg
This document is a transcript from page 58 of a deposition where an unnamed witness is questioned by an attorney, Mr. Tein, about lying about their age. The witness denies lying to buy beer or on their MySpace pages in general but admits to lying about being 18 in reference to 'Exhibit 26-01' and denies lying about being 19 in reference to 'Exhibit 33'. Other attorneys, Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold, are also present and interject.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012451.jpg
This document is page 56 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about deleting their MySpace page after receiving a subpoena. The witness confirms the deletion but claims it was a regular habit, not an attempt to hide information. Mr. Tein then accuses the witness of frequently lying about their age, which the witness denies, while their attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the questions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012450.jpg
This document is page 55 of a deposition transcript where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness. The questioning covers an altercation at a restaurant involving Mr. Epstein's process servers and the police, as well as the witness's decision to delete their MySpace page just days before the deposition. The witness denies the attorney's allegations about the restaurant incident but confirms the timing of the MySpace deletion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012449.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript excerpt, likely from September 29, 2004, where an attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about evading service of process from Mr. Epstein's process servers. The witness is accused of having an associate named Justin lie on their behalf and of requiring police intervention to be served at a restaurant. The transcript captures the witness's denials, legal objections by their counsel, Mr. Leopold, and sparring between the two attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012448.jpg
This document is a page from a contentious legal deposition transcript. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about an incident where they allegedly evaded process servers with the help of a manager named Justin. The witness confirms that Justin lied for them by stating they were not present.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012447.jpg
This document is a transcript of a contentious legal proceeding, likely a deposition. It captures a heated exchange between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, who appear to be opposing attorneys, regarding the questioning of an unnamed female witness. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's conduct, accusing him of berating the witness, leading to a personal argument where names are mistaken and prior court encounters are mentioned.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446.jpg
This document is page 51 of a legal transcript, identified as HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012446. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and Mr. Tein regarding the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold objects to a question, stating it has been asked multiple times and is harassing the witness, while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein defend their line of questioning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012445.jpg
This document is a page from a contentious deposition transcript where an unnamed female witness is questioned by attorney Mr. Tein about evading people by switching name tags at work. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects forcefully, calling the question 'harassment' and refusing to let his client answer, leading to a heated exchange between the lawyers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012444.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned by two attorneys, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The questioning focuses on an incident where the witness wore someone else's name tag, which they claim was a coincidence, on the same day they were to be served with a subpoena. The witness denies having prior knowledge that process servers were looking for them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443.jpg
This document is a two-page excerpt from a deposition transcript, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443'. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about a photograph (marked 18-001) showing the witness and a redacted friend, connecting the friend's presence to the day the witness was served a subpoena. The transcript also records a tense procedural discussion between the attorneys, Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger, regarding the marking of evidence.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a deposition.
No Subject
A contentious exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein questions the deponent about a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Herman, and Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege.
No Subject
A contentious argument between attorneys during a legal deposition. Mr. Tein attempts to ask questions, while Mr. Leopold interrupts and objects. Mr. Goldberger tries to clarify procedural rules.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange between opposing counsel during a deposition regarding the manner of questioning and professional conduct.
No Subject
A contentious dialogue during a legal deposition concerning the conduct of the attorneys. Mr. Tein attempts to ask questions, while Mr. Leopold objects strongly to his behavior, and Mr. Goldberger tries to clarify procedure.
No Subject
A heated argument between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's repetitive questioning and demeanor towards the witness, threatening to end the deposition and accusing Mr. Tein of harassment.
No Subject
Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold have a contentious exchange about procedural rules. Mr. Leopold insists Mr. Tein must show the witness a document to refresh her memory, while Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where attorneys question a witness under oath about events surrounding the service of a subpoena.
No Subject
A question-and-answer session where attorneys question a witness under oath about events surrounding the service of a subpoena.
No Subject
Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold have a contentious exchange about procedural rules. Mr. Leopold insists Mr. Tein must show the witness a document to refresh her memory, while Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction.
No Subject
A meeting to prepare for the deposition, which lasted from the start of the meeting until the deposition began.
No Subject
A contentious dialogue during a legal proceeding where Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female client, leading to a personal argument between the two attorneys.
No Subject
A heated argument between the two attorneys regarding the propriety of Mr. Tein's questions to a female witness. Mr. Leopold accuses Mr. Tein of trying to make the witness appear dishonest.
No Subject
A contentious argument between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein during a legal proceeding. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's line of questioning towards a female witness. The exchange becomes personal, involving accusations of yelling and a dispute over Mr. Tein's name.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
No Subject
A heated argument between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's repetitive questioning and demeanor towards the witness, threatening to end the deposition and accusing Mr. Tein of harassment.
No Subject
A meeting to prepare for the deposition, which lasted from the start of the meeting until the deposition began.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A heated exchange between the two attorneys. Mr. Tein questions a witness about their family speaking to reporters. Mr. Leopold objects and threatens to leave. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'grandstanding for your client' and tells him to 'be quiet'.
No Subject
A heated verbal exchange during a deposition where Mr. Tein instructs Mr. Leopold to stop making 'speaking objections'. Mr. Leopold defends his right to protect his client on the record, and Mr. Goldberger suggests a simpler way to object.
No Subject
A contentious legal deposition where Mr. Tein questions a witness, and Mr. Leopold objects.
No Subject
The entire document is a transcript of a contentious deposition dialogue.
No Subject
A heated argument between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold objects to Mr. Tein's repetitive questioning and demeanor towards the witness, threatening to end the deposition and accusing Mr. Tein of harassment.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
No Subject
Mr. Tein asks the witness about a lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein. Mr. Leopold objects, citing attorney-client privilege, and instructs the witness not to answer if the information is solely from their private discussions. A tense exchange occurs where Mr. Leopold misidentifies Mr. Tein as 'Lewis'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity