DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004782.jpg
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 25, 2021. Judge Alison J. Nathan granted the defendant's request that the Government is only required to file updates if there are material changes to Maxwell's conditions of confinement. The court noted it would take no further action absent other specific applications for relief.
DOJ-OGR-00004778.jpg
This document is page 2 of a court filing from June 16, 2021, regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It details the conditions of the defendant's confinement at the MDC, specifically highlighting her access to attorney communications (25 hours of VTC per week and weekend in-person visits) and the security measures in place, including soundless camera monitoring and mandatory searches (pat-downs, mouth checks, and strip searches).
DOJ-OGR-00004765.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ms. Days (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on June 15, 2021. Ms. Days speaks about her rehabilitation efforts, including the RDAP program, and expresses remorse, after which the Judge states that he is legally bound to impose a mandatory five-year (60-month) sentence despite finding her eloquent and educated. The document mentions Ms. Days' time spent in the SHU (Special Housing Unit).
DOJ-OGR-00004758.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on June 15, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). An attorney is arguing that the conditions at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) over the prior 14 months have been 'inhumane, cruel and harsh,' comparing them unfavorably to prisons in Mexico or El Salvador. The attorney references a client named Ms. Days and cites Judge Oetken's ruling in U.S. v. Gonzalez to argue for sentencing credit based on these harsh conditions.
DOJ-OGR-00004757.jpg
This document is page 14 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on June 15, 2021. The speaker, likely a defense attorney, argues that the defendant is engaging in positive intellectual growth by reading books by Coates and Baldwin, and highlights her strong family support system. The speaker also strongly condemns the conditions at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) during the Covid-19 lockdowns, describing the last 18-19 months of detention as 'inhumane'.
DOJ-OGR-00004752.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a sentencing hearing for a defendant named Ms. Days, dated June 15, 2021. The defendant confirms waiving her right to be physically present in the courtroom, opting to appear via CourtCall, while the government prosecutor, Mr. Chiuchiolo, states they will rely on their written sentencing submission. The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp, indicating it was released via a Department of Justice records request.
DOJ-OGR-00004751.jpg
This document is page 8 of a court transcript filed on June 15, 2021, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It records a dialogue between the Court, defense attorney Mr. Donaldson, and the defendant, Ms. Days. The discussion centers on Ms. Days waiving her right to be physically present in the courtroom for her sentencing, opting instead to proceed via video or telephone conference under the CARES Act.
DOJ-OGR-00004750.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a sentencing hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) held on June 15, 2021. The Court reviews sentencing parameters, including a 40-year statutory maximum and $5 million fine, and lists reviewed documents such as a presentence report by Officer Sandra Vella Garcia, a plea agreement, and sentencing memos from both the government and defense attorney Mr. Donaldson. Attorneys Mr. Chiuchiolo (Government) and Mr. Donaldson (Defense) confirm there are no other written submissions to review.
DOJ-OGR-00004747.jpg
This page serves as a divider or cover sheet for 'Exhibit A' within a larger legal filing. It is associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on June 15, 2021, and bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00004745.jpg
This document is a legal filing from the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim dated June 15, 2021, detailing complaints regarding the confinement conditions of Ghislaine Maxwell at the MDC. It outlines specific incidents of alleged harassment and obstruction by prison guards, including the reading of privileged legal materials, denial of water, excessive monitoring during legal visits, and technical interference with video conferencing that compromises attorney-client privilege.
DOJ-OGR-00004719.jpg
This document is page 12 (internal page 8) of a legal filing (Document 295) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on May 25, 2021. The text presents legal arguments regarding 'Double Jeopardy' and 'jeopardy attachment,' specifically analyzing when a defendant is considered to be at risk of conviction during pretrial dispositions and plea agreements. It heavily cites Second Circuit case law (Dionisio, Vanhoesen, Morris v. Reynolds) to argue that jeopardy does not attach to counts dismissed merely due to an agreement between parties without fact-based resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00004710.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, Document 295), filed on May 25, 2021. It lists numerous legal cases, primarily involving the United States as a party, which are cited as legal precedent within the main document. The table provides the case names, citations, and the page numbers where they are referenced in the brief.
DOJ-OGR-00004704.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for "Exhibit G," which was filed under seal on May 25, 2021, as part of the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Bates number in the footer, DOJ-OGR-00004704, indicates it is a document produced by the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00004693.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned about eight previously discussed victims, specifically regarding whether they had histories of illicit drug use or mental health issues. The witness confirms knowledge of these issues, but the specific details provided in the answer are fully redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00004690.jpg
This document is a page from a grand jury testimony transcript (filed 05/25/21) where Ms. Villafana questions a witness regarding evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's residence. The witness affirms that Epstein paid a female associate $100 to recruit other girls. The witness then introduces a specific carbon copy message pad recovered during a state search warrant execution, dated March 11, 2003, which documents a call from a redacted individual.
DOJ-OGR-00004687.jpg
This document is a page from a grand jury testimony transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed in May 2021. The testimony describes a witness stating that a redacted individual was paid $500 to take naked photographs of a girl (redacted name) at Jeffrey Epstein's residence. The testimony confirms the girl was 16 during the photos and 14 when she started seeing Epstein, despite being instructed by a handler to say she was 17. Epstein explicitly acknowledged her age of 14 and agreed to keep it a secret.
DOJ-OGR-00004677.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury testimony transcript where a Special Agent is being questioned about evidence supporting 'Overt Acts 191 through 225' in a proposed indictment. The agent testifies that they obtained flight manifests via subpoena from Epstein's pilot, showing Epstein's travel during 2004 and 2005 on his Boeing 727 and Gulfstream aircraft. The document explains the layout of a chart entitled 'Merged Flight Manifests' presented as evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00004676.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential Grand Jury testimony transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A Special Agent is testifying about 'Jane Does' who attended high schools in Palm Beach County during their contact with Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony confirms some victims left school before beginning their relationship with Epstein, and a document titled 'Merged Flight Manifests' is introduced into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00004671.jpg
This document is a page from a Grand Jury transcript filed in May 2021. A Grand Juror points out a discrepancy in a date of birth and activity range for a redacted individual, noting the activity range listed as 1988-2003 seemed problematic given the birth date. The witness clarifies it was a typo and the start date should be 1998. The witness mentions they have prepared a summary chart regarding various 'Jane Does' and will be discussing them.
DOJ-OGR-00004666.jpg
This document is a transcript page from a Grand Jury proceeding filed on May 25, 2021. It depicts the swearing-in of an FBI Special Agent (name redacted) based in West Palm Beach. The agent confirms involvement as a case agent in 'Operation Leap Year' and testifies that additional subpoenas have been issued and documents received in response.
DOJ-OGR-00004665.jpg
This document is the introductory page of a transcript regarding the sworn testimony of a Special Agent before a Federal Grand Jury in West Palm Beach, Florida, on March 18, 2008. The document identifies the location, date, and court reporting service involved, though the names of the agent and the reporter are redacted. It is marked confidential and appears to be part of a larger filing from 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00004646.jpg
This document is the final page (349 of 349) of a legal filing, Document 293-1, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on May 25, 2021. The page itself is intentionally blank but includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) production number at the bottom.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity