DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004643.jpg
This document is an exhibit separator page from a court filing dated May 25, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It identifies the following section as 'Exhibit 5' titled 'State Information' and bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00004619.jpg
This document is a cover sheet for Exhibit 2 in court case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It identifies the attached exhibit as a 'Draft Non-Prosecution Agreement' dated September 6, 2007. The page bears a Department of Justice bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00004619).
DOJ-OGR-00004605.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a DOJ OPR report analyzing the conduct of federal prosecutors (Villafaña, Acosta, Sloman, Menchel, Lourie) regarding the Jeffrey Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The report concludes that while there was no evidence prosecutors intentionally hid the NPA to protect Epstein, they failed to consult victims, leaving victims like Wild feeling misled and mistreated. The text details how Villafaña wished to consult victims but was constrained by management and concerns over creating impeachment evidence, a decision OPR criticizes as lacking consideration for the victims' rights and the fairness of the process.
DOJ-OGR-00002664.jpg
This page from a legal filing in the case US v. Ghislaine Maxwell argues against the retroactive application of extended statutes of limitations in criminal cases, citing the Ex Post Facto Clause and cases like Landgraf and Stogner. A crucial footnote asserts that the government is barred from prosecuting Maxwell for offenses against Minor Victim-3 because the statute of limitations had already expired when the victim turned 25 (year redacted) prior to the 2003 Amendment.
DOJ-OGR-00002663.jpg
This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, argues against the retroactive application of a 2003 Amendment to the alleged offenses of Ms. Maxwell. The author contends that Congressional intent was clear in rejecting retroactivity and that applying the amendment would have impermissible effects. The argument is supported by legal precedents, including Landgraf, Toussie, and Gentile, which favor interpreting criminal statutes of limitation in a way that provides 'repose' for the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00033091.jpg
This document is page 103 of a deposition transcript (processed 07/26/17) involving questioning by Mr. Tein. The witness is asked about communications regarding 'the case' with individuals named Roman, Vince, Tiffany Rich, Justin, and Cara. The witness confirms speaking briefly with Tiffany Rich but denies speaking to Vince or knowing a friend named Justin.
DOJ-OGR-00033090.jpg
This document is page 102 of a deposition transcript (Bates DOJ-OGR-00033090) recorded by Consor & Associates. An unnamed witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein regarding the identification of several men in a photograph or video, including John Brown, Steven Lavelle, Robbie Shergan, and Brandon Salnal. The witness also identifies a woman named Courtney Sailor and a man named Vince as friends of their sister.
DOJ-OGR-00033089.jpg
This is a page from a deposition transcript (page 101) processed on July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about a photograph involving Steven Lavelle and a man identified phonetically as Robbie Shergan. The opposing counsel, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects to Mr. Tein interrupting the witness.
DOJ-OGR-00033085.jpg
This document is page 97 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about whether she has text messaged FBI agents or federal prosecutors, or if they have shared information with her regarding what 'other girls' have said; she denies both. She also discusses her parents' knowledge of how to contact the FBI, noting that her mother 'doesn't care to know any of this stuff' and mentioning an individual named Paul associated with her mother.
DOJ-OGR-00033075.jpg
This is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 87) involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The text captures a contentious exchange between the lawyers regarding objections and procedure. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they or their mother have spoken to or received money from reporters; the witness answers 'No' to the questions regarding themselves.
DOJ-OGR-00033073.jpg
This page is a transcript of a deposition involving a female witness being questioned by Mr. Tein while being defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness testifies that her mother and sister have not spoken to reporters ('zero'), but she cannot speak for her father and stepmother as she does not contact them. The exchange becomes heated when the attorneys argue over the line of questioning, with Mr. Tein telling Mr. Leopold to 'Be quiet' and Mr. Leopold threatening to leave if professional conduct is not maintained.
DOJ-OGR-00033065.jpg
This page is a deposition transcript where a witness is questioned about family members (mother, sister, and mother's husband Paul) living in Georgia. The questioning shifts to whether the witness discussed 'Epstein's case' with Paul, and specifically if they discussed 'what happened in Mr. Epstein's house' with an individual named Brett Albritton, to which the witness confirms Brett knows the basics.
DOJ-OGR-00033064.jpg
This document is page 76 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Mr. Tein questions a witness regarding a car ride with an individual named Hayley and another unidentified person described as 'dark like a Spanish girl.' The witness denies knowing a specific redacted individual (alleged to be a good friend) and denies lying to the police. The witness acknowledges speaking about the case with their twin sister (name redacted) but claims the sister does not have an email address.
DOJ-OGR-00033059.jpg
This document is page 71 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness about lying about their age on a MySpace page (claiming to be 18) and subsequently changing it to their true age four days before testifying before a Grand Jury. The witness admits to lying about the age initially but claims not to remember changing it back, citing that they had a 'bazillion' MySpace accounts. The page concludes with Mr. Tein asking if the witness remembers Detective Recarey.
DOJ-OGR-00033054.jpg
Page 66 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, attorney Mr. Tein, and attorney Mr. Leopold. The questioning focuses on the witness's alleged habit of lying about their age, specifically in relation to MySpace and obtaining body piercings. The witness denies lying to get piercings but clarifies they have one body piercing (excluding ears) after initially stating five.
DOJ-OGR-00033050.jpg
This is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Tein questions a redacted witness about an incident at the 'Quarterdeck Tavern' where the witness's manager, Justin, allegedly lied to process servers to hide the witness. The page opens with a contentious exchange between the lawyers before a recess is taken.
DOJ-OGR-00025481.jpg
This document is an internal DOJ/BOP email dated December 6, 2019, discussing a media inquiry from the NY Daily News regarding poor morale and facility conditions at MCC New York following Jeffrey Epstein's suicide. The reporter notes that morale has plummeted due to 'falsification of documents charges' and staffing issues, asking specific questions about funding, hiring, and policy changes since Epstein's death. The proposed government responses to these questions are fully redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00025433.jpg
An email chain between DOJ/BOP staff dated August 11-12, 2019, immediately following Jeffrey Epstein's death. Staff are coordinating a 'time critical' reconstruction of Epstein's '292 data' (likely movement or activity logs) for the week leading up to his death (August 5-9), noting that he was found dead in his SHU cell at NYM on Saturday morning. One staff member notes an inability to access the 'J3P1' system to research history records.
DOJ-OGR-00025411.jpg
This document is a Suicide Watch Observation Log for inmate Epstein (Reg #76318-054) on July 24, 2019. It records observations in 15-minute intervals from 0300 am to 0615 am. For most of the period, Epstein was observed sleeping, though he woke up several times to use the bathroom, drink water, and ask the observer questions about the time, breakfast, and medical services.
DOJ-OGR-00025410.jpg
This is a Suicide Watch Observation Log for inmate Epstein (Reg #76318-054) for the night of July 23, 2019. The log documents observations in Cell #4 from 10:45 PM to 2:45 AM, noting that Epstein was sleeping for most of the period. The document also records the transfer of responsibility between observing staff at the beginning and end of the logged period.
DOJ-OGR-00025367.jpg
This document is an email dated August 1, 2019, from Associate Warden Charisma Edge to Lamine N'Diaye providing a synopsis of Jeffrey Epstein's recent activities and psychological status. It details that Epstein was taken off 'psych ops' on July 30, attended court on July 31, and had a Suicide Risk Assessment on August 1 which deemed him 'psychologically stable.' Crucially, the email notes the assessment was initiated because Epstein returned from court with a note indicating suicidal tendencies.
DOJ-OGR-00025325.jpg
This document is a cover page for a mail attachment. The attachment is a Microsoft Word document (.docx) file named in reference to Jeffrey Edward Epstein and his registration number, 73618-054. The page also contains a document control number from the Department of Justice (DOJ).
DOJ-OGR-00025308.jpg
This document is the cover sheet for a 'Suicide Watch Chronological Log' (specifically an Inmate Companions Log) for inmate Epstein at the MCC. It documents a watch period from July 23, 2019, to July 24, 2019, identifying his register number as 76318-054 and listing strict restrictions on allowed items such as suicide smocks and blankets.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity