DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014665.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a dispute between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding a response to a jury note. The jury requested an 'FBI deposition 3505-005' referenced during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The defense attempted to include testimony from Special Agent Jason Richards in the response, but the Court overruled the request, deeming it unresponsive to the jury's specific ask.
DOJ-OGR-00014664.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the judge and attorneys (Comey, Pagliuca, Sternheim) regarding a jury note and testimony related to Exhibit 3505-005 given by witnesses 'Carolyn' and Special Agent Jason Richards. The judge notes that copies of the notes provided to counsel must be redacted because the jury foreperson signed them.
DOJ-OGR-00014663.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Ms. Comey, and Mr. Pagliuca regarding how to respond to a jury question about an item labeled '3505-005'. The parties agree to send a note clarifying that 3505-005 is not an admitted exhibit but referring the jury to 'Carolyn's testimony' regarding it.
DOJ-OGR-00014653.jpg
This document is page 253 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The text records the court instructing the jury to begin deliberations and identifying five alternate jurors (numbers 125, 149, 151, 152, and 170). The Judge provides strict instructions to the alternates to refrain from discussing the case or consuming media until they are either recalled by Ms. Williams or released.
DOJ-OGR-00014651.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) recording a sidebar conference between the Judge and legal counsel (Moe, Menninger, Sternheim, Pagliuca). The discussion focuses on instructions for alternate jurors (specifically identifying jurors 125, 149, 151, 152, and 170), confirming they should remain 'on call' rather than stay in the building due to pandemic concerns, and setting parameters for evening deliberations.
DOJ-OGR-00014643.jpg
This document is page 243 (transcript page 3077) of the jury charge filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 53 regarding the lawful use and consideration of seized electronic communications as evidence, and the beginning of Instruction No. 54 regarding 'Persons Not on Trial'.
DOJ-OGR-00014637.jpg
This document is page 237 of a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions delivered by the judge, specifically addressing the use of pseudonyms for witness privacy due to media attention, and 'Instruction No. 45' regarding the credibility of witnesses and impeachment by prior inconsistent statements. The judge instructs the jury that prior inconsistent statements should be used to evaluate credibility, not as affirmative evidence of Maxwell's guilt.
DOJ-OGR-00014634.jpg
This document is page 234 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the burden of proof, specifically noting that guilt cannot be inferred solely from association with wrongdoers. It also begins 'Instruction No. 44,' detailing how jurors should evaluate the credibility, demeanor, and honesty of witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00014627.jpg
This document is page 227 of the jury instructions (Charge) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on August 10, 2022. The text outlines legal standards for considering co-conspirator statements made in the defendant's absence and introduces Instruction No. 39 regarding 'Conscious Avoidance.' The judge explains that the jury may consider whether the defendant 'deliberately closed her eyes to what otherwise would have been obvious' when determining if she acted knowingly.
DOJ-OGR-00014619.jpg
This document is page 219 of a court transcript (Document 767, Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains the judge's charge to the jury regarding the legal standards for conspiracy as applied to the defendant, Ms. Maxwell. The text explains that the government must prove knowledge and intent, but clarifies that Maxwell did not need to know every detail or member of the conspiracy, nor did she need to be involved from the beginning to be held responsible for the conspiracy's activities.
DOJ-OGR-00014617.jpg
This document is page 217 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Court is providing jury instructions regarding Count Five, charging Ghislaine Maxwell with conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors between 2001 and 2004. It details Instruction No. 35, which explains the burden of proof required to establish Maxwell's membership in the conspiracy.
DOJ-OGR-00014616.jpg
This document is page 216 of a court transcript (Document 767) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains the judge's charge to the jury regarding 'Count Three,' specifically outlining the requirements to prove a conspiracy to transport minors for illegal sexual activity between 1994 and 2004. The text explains that the jury must find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant agreed with another person to commit these acts.
DOJ-OGR-00014614.jpg
This document is page 214 of a court transcript (Document 767) from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains the judge's charge to the jury regarding the legal definition of a 'conspiracy.' The text explains that a conspiracy consists of a mutual understanding, express or implied, to violate the law, and notes that direct evidence of an explicit agreement is not required, as circumstantial evidence and conduct can prove the existence of such an agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00014613.jpg
This document is page 213 of 257 from the court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains Jury Instruction No. 33 regarding Counts One, Three, and Five, specifically defining the legal elements of 'Conspiracy to violate federal law.' The text explains that a conspiracy requires an agreement between two or more persons to commit an unlawful act and at least one overt act, regardless of the conspiracy's ultimate success.
DOJ-OGR-00014607.jpg
This document is page 207 of a court transcript (Jury Charge) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details 'Instruction No. 29' regarding 'Count Six: Sex trafficking of an individual under the age of 18.' The judge instructs the jury that the consent or willingness of the victim, identified specifically as 'Carolyn,' is not a valid defense if she was under 18. The text also outlines the 'Fourth element' of the charge, defining 'interstate commerce' and the government's burden of proof regarding Maxwell's conduct affecting it.
DOJ-OGR-00014600.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) containing jury instructions regarding Count Two of the indictment. The judge instructs the jury on New York Penal Law Section 130.55 (sexual abuse in the third degree) relevant to acts alleged between 1994 and 1997. The text defines 'sexual contact' and explicitly states that individuals under the age of 17 are legally incapable of consenting to such contact.
DOJ-OGR-00014594.jpg
This document is page 194 of a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) containing jury instructions for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details Counts Three through Six of the indictment, specifying charges of conspiracy, transportation of minors for illegal sexual activity, and sex trafficking. Specific victims 'Jane' (1994-1997) and 'Carolyn' (2001-2004) are named in relation to specific counts.
DOJ-OGR-00014593.jpg
This document is page 193 of a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) containing jury instructions for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The judge instructs the jury on the presumption of innocence and summarizes the first two counts of the indictment: Count One regarding conspiracy to entice minors (1994-2004) and Count Two regarding the enticement of a specific individual named 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00014589.jpg
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, containing jury instructions (Instruction No. 5: Improper considerations) for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The text instructs the jury to base their verdict solely on evidence and explicitly prohibits discrimination or bias based on race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, or economic circumstances regarding Ms. Maxwell or any witnesses. It also defines and warns against the influence of unconscious bias and public opinion.
DOJ-OGR-00014587.jpg
This document is page 187 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It contains the judge's charge to the jury, specifically instructing them not to research the case externally or communicate about it outside the jury room. It also details Instruction No. 4, explaining that statements made by attorneys are arguments, not evidence, and that the jury's own recollection of the evidence must control their decision.
DOJ-OGR-00014584.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures the final sentences of prosecutor Ms. Comey's closing argument, urging the jury to find the defendant guilty of sexual abuse of underage girls. Following this, the Court (Judge Nathan) begins reading the jury instructions (The Charge), specifically starting with Instruction No. 1 regarding the Role of the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00014580.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Rebuttal by Ms. Comey) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that the testimonies of victims Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie are credible specifically because they did not exaggerate Maxwell's involvement (e.g., admitting she wasn't always in the room or only touched them in specific ways), contrasting this with 'better lies' they could have told if fabricating the story. The text details specific sexual acts and interactions attributed to Maxwell and Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00014577.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring a rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey. Comey refutes the defense's suggestion (attributed to Ms. Menninger) that the FBI manipulated witnesses or asked leading questions, citing the ethical testimony of Special Agent Young. She argues that the victims (Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie) did not misremember the defendant's role in their abuse and that the defense's argument relies on the jury believing all witnesses are liars.
DOJ-OGR-00014529.jpg
This document is a page from the closing arguments (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed August 10, 2022. Menninger argues that a witness named Carolyn did not mention Maxwell in sworn testimony or depositions 12 years prior (2009), nor did message pads show calls to Maxwell from Carolyn, only to Epstein. The defense uses this inconsistency to attack the credibility of the witness's current testimony connecting Maxwell to the abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00011772.jpg
This document is a Notice of Filing of Official Transcript filed on August 10, 2022, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case No. 20-cr-330) in the Southern District of New York. The notice confirms that a transcript for a conference held on November 29, 2021, has been filed by court reporter 'speer'. It outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers from the transcript.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity