| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
This document is an automated email notification from the E2 Solutions travel system regarding a travel voucher for a DOJ employee. The voucher (ID 11061344-1) details expenses of $1,059.52 for a trip to Beverly Hills, CA, from February 26-29, 2020. The explicitly stated purpose of the trip is 'R20NYS13402 - Epstein Investigation - Witness interview'.
This document is a Fact Witness Travel Request form dated August 31, 2021, submitted by an AUSA to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for a redacted witness to travel to the Southern District of New York for trial or grand jury preparation scheduled for September 17, 2021. The witness is expected to arrive on September 16 and depart on September 17 or 18.
This document is an email dated October 13, 2020, from Nicholas Biase of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject line is 'Re: Epstein and SDNY in 2016'. The recipient list includes redacted USANYS staff and a contractor. The body of the email is completely redacted, followed by a Department of Justice Message-ID.
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated October 2020, discussing a press inquiry from the NY Daily News. The reporter, Stephen Rex Brown, provides details of a story alleging that in 2016, SDNY prosecutors (specifically an AUSA named Kramer) met with victims' lawyers but declined to pursue new charges against Jeffrey Epstein or perjury charges against Ghislaine Maxwell. The internal SDNY response suggests they have no record of the second meeting mentioned and decide not to push back against the story.
This document is an email chain from April 8, 2021, initiated by Reuters correspondent Jonathan Stempel seeking comment from the government (likely SDNY/DOJ) regarding a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers. Stempel asks about the DOJ's response to claims that disclosing prison condition details at MDC might poison the jury pool. Internal government emails show officials flagging the inquiry, noting it relates to a 'HIPAA issue,' and stating they declined to comment.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between the FBI (New York Field Office), USANYS, and an external party regarding financial records. The correspondence focuses on securing account statements, opening documents, and KYC records for Epstein accounts where Ghislaine Maxwell was a designated signer, specifically referencing a June 2007 statement.
This document is an email chain from October 2021 involving an FBI Forensic Accountant and USANYS personnel. They discuss the compilation and upload of financial documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on accounts where Ghislaine Maxwell was a signer (Hyperion Air, JEGE, NES LLC) and memos requesting her removal from these accounts.
This document is a list of file paths and names, likely referencing image files (.tif) within a structured directory related to a TD-DOJ collection. It appears to serve as an index or manifest for digital files, with each line indicating a unique document ID, a sub-identifier, a directory path, and the filename, along with a page number or similar numerical indicator. The list spans multiple pages with sequential EFTA document numbers.
This document is an automated email notification dated October 23, 2019, regarding a travel authorization within the Department of Justice (DOJ). The travel is for a redacted individual to go to West Palm Beach, FL, on November 4, 2019, for the purpose of 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews.' The specific identities of the traveler and approvers are redacted.
This document is an email thread from July 3, 2020, involving a US DOJ Attaché in London. The emails discuss the UK media reaction to the arrest of Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on the implications for Prince Andrew. The sender notes it is 'weird' that a redacted individual reached out to them right before the arrest occurred.
This document is an email chain from May 21, 2021, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The correspondence coordinates the language for a public letter announcing a deferred prosecution agreement with the two prison guards on duty the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide, who were charged with falsifying records. The USANYS sought OIG's approval to state that the guards agreed to interviews as part of an ongoing OIG investigation expected to lead to a report.
This document is an email from July 27, 2019, notifying the recipient that a final travel voucher for Trip ID 10416822-1 has been approved and is awaiting further approval. The purpose of the trip, from July 11-12, 2019, was for victim interviews in West Palm Beach, FL, related to the U.S. v. Epstein case (2018R01618), with total expenses of $779.97 and an estimated cost of $1050.66.
This document is an email chain from June 2020 regarding discovery requests for the Jeffrey Epstein suicide investigation. A Special Investigative Agent at MCC New York responds to legal counsel (likely for Defendant Noel) regarding the production of SHU logs, policy statements, and training materials. The agent notes that physical logs and Epstein's central file were likely seized by the FBI or OIG shortly after Epstein's death, complicating the retrieval of certain documents.
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York regarding a draft opposition to a bail motion. The file path included in the email explicitly links the work to the 'USvEpstein' case and 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell), specifically referencing a 'government opposition to fourth motion for bail' due on November 8, 2021. The thread involves a Deputy Chief of the Public Corruption Unit submitting a draft for review.
An internal email from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY dated January 29, 2019, providing network file paths to materials related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation (case ID USvEpstein-2018R01618). The paths reference Grand Jury transcripts, a statement by Juan Alessi, victim interviews, FBI 302 reports, and an 'Epstein universe spreadsheet'.
This document is an email thread from November 2019 discussing a travel voucher (ID 10810414) for a DOJ employee. The trip took place from November 13-15, 2019, in Santa Monica, CA, for the specific purpose of a 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interview'. The traveler disputes the voucher details, noting that hotel expenses and taxes were paid via personal credit card rather than the government travel card.
This document is a printout of an email chain from August 2021 involving personnel at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). An Assistant United States Attorney (name redacted) sent an email on August 23, 2021, which was subsequently forwarded on August 26, 2021. The email includes an attachment labeled 'USGME00444198_native.pdf'. The document appears to be related to legal proceedings, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial given the timeframe and agency involved, though specific content is redacted.
This document is an automated email notification from the DOJ's E2 Solutions travel system dated February 10, 2020. It concerns a final travel voucher for a trip to Stockholm, Sweden, that took place from February 3-6, 2020. The stated purpose of the trip is explicitly for 'Epstein investigation (2018R01618) - Witness Interviews,' with the traveler's name redacted.
This document is an email chain from January 31, 2020, between an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) and other DOJ officials regarding a travel approval form related to the Epstein case. The correspondence discusses the urgent submission of a 'Sweden travel memo' which had been delayed pending OIA approval, and the need to forward the signed memo to the EOUSA. The document highlights the bureaucratic process involving the SDNY, OIA, DOJ, and EOUSA in post-2019 Epstein-related investigations.
This document is an automated email notification from the DOJ's E2Solutions travel system dated January 28, 2020. It confirms that a travel authorization for a redacted traveler to go to Stockholm, Sweden, from February 3-8, 2020, has been approved by one party and is pending further approval. The stated purpose of the trip is 'Witness Interviews' for the Epstein investigation (case ID 2018R01618).
This document is an automated email notification from CWT SatoTravel regarding the approval of a final travel voucher for a DOJ employee. The trip, dated February 19-20, 2020, was to Pensacola, Florida, for the specific purpose of a witness interview related to the 'Epstein Investigation' (Case ID R20NYS13403). The traveler's identity is redacted.
This document is an automated email notification dated February 25, 2020, regarding the final approval of a travel voucher (Trip ID 11062816). The voucher relates to a trip taken by a redacted individual from the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Pensacola, FL, on February 19-20, 2020. The explicit purpose of the trip was listed as 'R20NYS13401 - Epstein Investigation - Witness interview,' with total expenses amounting to $1,040.52.
This document is an email chain dated November 10-11, 2021, among staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) regarding the discovery process for the US v. Epstein/Maxwell case (indicated by file paths 'USvEpstein-2018R01618' and attachment 'Maxwell_Discovery_Letter'). The discussion focuses on processing 'Amazon returns' (subpoenaed data), deciding whether to mark them as confidential, and preparing them for a 'Rule 16 production.' The emails reference specific network file paths where the evidence and stamped returns are stored.
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019 (two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death), involving high-level officials from the ODAG, OIG, FBI, and USANYS. The correspondence concerns the urgent review of a draft letter intended for Congressional leaders regarding Epstein. The Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General asks for a quick turnaround on the review, incorporating comments from the previous night.
This document contains a chain of emails from October 15, 2020, discussing the technical details of document production and e-discovery for the case 'US v. Epstein'. The participants discuss refining search terms to identify 'junk' versus 'responsive' documents, specifically troubleshooting a keyword search that inadvertently captured responsive material. The conversation involves two distinct databases or search sets: 'US v. Epstein database' and 'US v. Epstein (SW)'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity