| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
This document is an email chain from August 1, 2019, between attorney Martin Weinberg (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted government official (likely DOJ). Weinberg is coordinating the preservation of documents, specifically inquiring about notifying AUSAs in the Southern District of Florida (SD Fla) and other districts. He attaches a 'Supplemental Discovery Letter' and seeks confirmation on whether the recipient will handle the preservation requests or if Weinberg needs to contact the agents/AUSAs directly.
This document is a travel authorization email dated February 21, 2020, approving a trip for a redacted individual from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The purpose of the trip, scheduled for February 26-29, 2020, in Los Angeles, CA, is explicitly listed as a 'Witness interview' for the 'Epstein Investigation' (Case ID R20NYS13402).
This document is an email thread between USANYS/DOJ officials dated November 6-7, 2020, discussing the forensic review of Jeffrey Epstein's iPhone ('JE iPhone'). The emails detail the division of the phone's data into 'chunks' for review, specifically mentioning chats, audio files, documents, voicemails, and videos. A specific network path is provided for the data location related to case 'USvEpstein-2018R01618'.
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 regarding the technical processing of evidence for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case #2018R01618). An Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) requests the uploading of subpoena returns from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity review platform. The technical staff discusses issues with DVD-formatted video files (VIDEO_TS folders) and specific interviews/walkthrough videos that require conversion or exclusion from the database.
An email dated March 25, 2019, from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York requesting the upload of subpoena response documents from the law firm Boies Schiller (BSF) into the Relativity database for the case US v. Epstein (2018R01618). The email specifies a network file path on the DOJ cloud server containing the documents and outlines the desired folder structure for the upload relative to the 'FBI Case File'.
An email chain from July 22, 2020, involving DOJ and USAEO staff discussing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for Ghislaine Maxwell's mugshot. The correspondence clarifies that the Southern District of New York (SDNY) does not possess the mugshot and discusses the procedure for handling such inquiries. The initial sender from the FOIA/PA staff in D.C. notes that the photo is not circulating on the internet and seeks verification of its existence and releasability.
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Offices for the Southern (USANYS) and Eastern (USANYE) Districts of New York regarding inmate Johnny (Jhonny) Contreras. Contreras's attorney, Andrew Patel, informed the government that Contreras was housed across the hall from Jeffrey Epstein in the MCC SHU at the time of Epstein's death and was willing to speak to investigators about his observations, though he did not witness the hanging itself. USANYS agents interviewed Contreras on September 3, 2019, and noted that an FBI form 302 report would be generated.
This document is a heavily redacted email thread from January 5, 2021, between US Attorney's Office (USANYS) employees. The subject of the email is a link to a NY Daily News article reporting that former Attorney General Bill Barr questioned Jeffrey Epstein's cellmate. The email appears to be an internal circulation of press coverage regarding the Epstein case.
This document is an email chain from February 2020 between USANYS employees regarding a 'Criminal Division update.' There was initial confusion about the deadline, with one email stating it was moved to August 14th to stop 'panic mode,' but subsequent emails clarifying that a report was indeed due that Friday (Feb 14). The final email attaches a document titled 'PC_Unit__Short_Form_Update.2.14.20v2.docx'.
This document is an email thread from August 5-6, 2019, within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). An Assistant U.S. Attorney requests a contractor to burn a disc containing 'Fourth Production and Fifth Production' materials, specifically Deutsche Bank subpoena returns, for an FBI Special Agent and a Detective working on the Epstein investigation. The email provides the specific network file path for the data and the password 'USAO_sdny2018!' for the encrypted disc.
This document is an automated email notification from CWTSatoTravel regarding a Department of Justice (DOJ) travel authorization (Trip ID 10893150). The authorization is for a trip to Santa Monica, CA, scheduled for December 15-17, 2019. The explicitly stated purpose of the trip is 'U.S. v. Epstein - Witness Interviews,' indicating post-mortem investigation activities.
This document is an email chain from November 15, 2019, among likely DOJ/SDNY officials discussing a voicemail received from an attorney named David Hall (phone number 2022466629). The sender notes that the message 'relates to the Epstein case' and explains that Hall obtained their number through a mutual friend, a former AUSA in Cleveland, because Hall was seeking an SDNY contact. The recipient agrees to call Hall back.
An email chain from November 30, 2018, discussing various legal actions involving Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents clarify the nature of a specific lawsuit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, identifying it as a malicious prosecution suit filed against Epstein by an attorney who represented Epstein's victims. The discussion distinguishes this case from the victims' suit against the government regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). An attachment 'Plaintiff's_Motion_08_Civ_80736.pdf' is provided as an example of motion practice.
This document is a 'Fact Witness Travel Request' dated July 19, 2021, submitted to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The form requests travel arrangements and hotel accommodations for a domestic fact witness (whose identity is redacted) to appear in the SDNY for trial or grand jury preparation at 1 p.m. on a redacted date. The document confirms the individual is a fact witness, not a victim-witness, and resides within the continental United States.
An automated email notification from CWTSatoTravel to a redacted recipient at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The email confirms final approval for Travel Authorization 10892303-1. The trip took place from December 15-18, 2019, in Santa Monica, California, for the specific purpose of a 'Witness Interview' related to the case 'U.S. v. Epstein' (Case ID R20NYS13197).
This document is an internal Department of Justice email chain from March 2019 between an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and technical support staff. The correspondence concerns the uploading of digital evidence into the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform for the case 'US v. Epstein' (Case # 2018R01618). Specifically, the attorney requests the creation of a folder structure to house the 'first subpoena response' received from the law firm Boies Schiller, dated March 4, 2019.
This document is an email thread from March 2019 between redacted government officials (likely DOJ) discussing a draft status memo. The attachment filename '2019-03-06_JE_status_memo_to_ODAG.docx' indicates the memo concerns 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and is intended for the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. The discussion focuses on the length of the document and the inclusion of legal analysis.
Administrative travel request form dated November 20, 2021, submitted by an AUSA to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit for a fact witness in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The witness, whose identity is redacted, was scheduled to arrive in New York on November 27, 2021, and depart on December 2, 2021, for trial preparation. The document explicitly notes that this individual is a fact witness and not a victim-witness.
This document is a 'Fact Witness Travel Request' submitted to the SDNY Victim/Witness Unit on November 19, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It requests travel arrangements for a domestic witness who is explicitly identified as a 'Victim-Witness' to appear for trial and trial preparation. The witness's identity and specific travel dates are redacted, but the form confirms they reside within the continental United States and require a hotel.
This document is an automated email notification dated March 24, 2020, confirming the final approval of a travel voucher (ID 11061409-1). The travel occurred between February 26 and February 29, 2020, within the United States for the specific purpose of 'Epstein Investigation Witness interviews' (Case/Code R20NYS13400). The traveler's name is redacted, but the voucher indicates expenses totaling $1,196.11 are awaiting payment.
This document is an email header dated December 18, 2020, originating from a US Department of Justice address regarding the subject 'Jeffrey Epstein Estate Must Share Private Videos Recorded At His Properties.' The email appears to be internal correspondence involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
An email thread from March 30, 2021, among DOJ officials discussing a Westlaw alert for a 'supposedly sealed order' related to Jeffrey Epstein and Boies Schiller. The thread clarifies that the document is actually a 2019 order recently unsealed in which Judge Netburn denied an application to modify a protective order in a civil case. The participants express confusion initially about why a sealed order appeared public.
Internal email correspondence within the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated May 6, 2020. Staff members are circulating news articles from the New York Law Journal ('The Prince and the Proffer') and NY Daily News regarding Judge Berman's critical comments on DOJ policies and investigations 'post-Epstein'.
An email chain from December 30, 2020, in which a DOJ Attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Paris forwards a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) request from French authorities. The request relates to the investigation of an individual (name redacted) who was recently arrested in Paris. The sender notes they are already in contact with the recipients regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings.
This document is an automated email notification dated March 11, 2021, confirming the acceptance of a scheduled call regarding 'Epstein FOIA' (Freedom of Information Act). The email is from an individual at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) to an unidentified recipient.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity